About Pete Dinelli

Pete Dinelli was born and raised in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is of Italian and Hispanic descent. He is a 1970 graduate of Del Norte High School, a 1974 graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with a Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration and a 1977 graduate of St. Mary's School of Law, San Antonio, Texas. Pete has a 40 year history of community involvement and service as an elected and appointed official and as a practicing attorney in Albuquerque. Pete and his wife Betty Case Dinelli have been married since 1984 and they have two adult sons, Mark, who is an attorney and George, who is an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT). Pete has been a licensed New Mexico attorney since 1978. Pete has over 27 years of municipal and state government service. Pete’s service to Albuquerque has been extensive. He has been an elected Albuquerque City Councilor, serving as Vice President. He has served as a Worker’s Compensation Judge with Statewide jurisdiction. Pete has been a prosecutor for 15 years and has served as a Bernalillo County Chief Deputy District Attorney, as an Assistant Attorney General and Assistant District Attorney and as a Deputy City Attorney. For eight years, Pete was employed with the City of Albuquerque both as a Deputy City Attorney and Chief Public Safety Officer overseeing the city departments of police, fire, 911 emergency call center and the emergency operations center. While with the City of Albuquerque Legal Department, Pete served as Director of the Safe City Strike Force and Interim Director of the 911 Emergency Operations Center. Pete’s community involvement includes being a past President of the Albuquerque Kiwanis Club, past President of the Our Lady of Fatima School Board, and Board of Directors of the Albuquerque Museum Foundation.

Führer Trump Attempts Coup d’é·tat; Actions Of Trump And His Supporters Nothing Short Of Insurrection; Biden Certified New President By Congress

On the Morning of January 6, Führer Donald Trump spoke to thousands of his upset and angry supporters in Washington, DC in front of the White House before the Congress was to schedule to accept the electoral college vote as mandated by the United States Constitution.

As usual, Trump’s speech was inflammatory and full of lies. Trump told the crowd that the election had been “rigged” by “radical democrats” and the “fake news media” and he said in part:

“We will never give up. We will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved. … Our country has had enough. We’re not going to take it anymore.”

Not at all surprising, Trump stoked his followers to take action and head to capitol hill to protest and said:

“And after this, we’re going to walk down there, and I’ll be there with you, we’re going to walk down … to the Capitol and we are going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women. … And we’re probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them. Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength and you have to be strong.”

“You’re the real people. You’re the people that built this nation. You’re not the people that tore down this nation.”

“Now it is up to Congress to confront this egregious assault on our democracy.”

NOVEMBER 3RD ELECTION WAS THE MOST SECURE IN AMERICAN HISTORY

On November 12, The Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a statement regarding the 2020 Presidential election and said:

“… The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. … There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised. … While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections …”

The link to the full statement is here:

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election

The actions and demands of all the Republican lawmakers who objected to the electoral college votes are tied directly to President Donald Trump’s claims that the 2020 election was rigged and the election was stolen from him in the key battleground states that voted for Biden.

Over 60 federal lawsuits file by the Trump campaign challenging the state election have been dismissed and thrown out of court because there was virtually no evidence of election fraud. Election officials from all the battleground states, the Electoral College, the Justice Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and the US Supreme Court have found virtually no evidence of election fraud.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/gop-senators-threaten-object-electoral-college-results-if-commission-not-n1252667

STORMING THE CAPITOL

Soon after Trump spoke, supporters believing all Trumps lies that the election was rigged went to the United States Capitol to protest. The Congress had already begun the process of counting and certifying the electoral college vote. A mob was able to breach security and successfully enter the building, where one person was shot and later died.

Hundreds of pro-Trump protesters pushed through barriers set up along the perimeter of the Capitol, where they engaged with officers in full riot gear, some calling the officers “traitors” for doing their jobs. About 90 minutes later, police said demonstrators got into the building and the doors to the House and Senate were being locked. Shortly after, the House floor was evacuated by police. Vice President Mike Pence was also evacuated from the chamber, he was to perform his role in the counting of electoral votes.

An armed standoff took place at the House Chamber front door. Capitol police officers had guns drawn pointing at someone who looking through the chamber’s broken glass window and who was trying to breach the door of the chamber. Afte gaining access to the Chamber, a Trump supporter sat in the chair of the Senate President located on the Senate dais. Other protesters gained access to house offices. One insurgent was photo graphed stealing the podium from the House of Representatives chamber floor.

Smoke grenades were used on the Senate side of the Capitol as police worked to clear the building of rioters. Windows on the west side of the Senate were broken, and hundreds of officers amassed on the first floor of the building.

The protesters first breached exterior security barriers, and video footage showed protesters gathering and some clashing with police near the Capitol building. A number of protesters climbed up the side of the Capitol building to gain access. Windows were broken to gain access. Protesters roamed the interior of the building and went to the House Chamber.

Protesters pushed against metal fences and police using the fences to push protesters back, while other officers reached over the top to club people trying to cross their lines.

After the building was breached, the Capitol police officer in the House chamber told lawmakers that they may need to duck under their chairs and informed lawmakers that protesters were in the building’s Rotunda. House members were seen wearing gas masks as they move between Capitol buildings.

Congressional leaders were evacuated from the Capitol complex and taken to Fort McNair, a nearby Army base in Washington.

A woman is dead after being shot in the chest on the Capitol grounds, DC police confirmed to CNN. More information on the shooting was not immediately available and a police spokesperson said additional details will come later.

https://www.cnn.com/2021/01/06/politics/us-capitol-lockdown/index.html

The display of insurrection was the first time the US Capitol had been overrun since the British attacked and burned the US Capital building during the War of 1812.

CONGRESS RETURNS TO WORK AND CERTIFIES BIDEN 46 PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES

Within 7 hours after protestors took over the Capitol building and after they were evacuated from the building, the Congress returned to work to certify the election of Joe Biden. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the congressional leadership wanted to continue by saying:

“Today, a shameful assault was made on our democracy. It was anointed at the highest level of government. It cannot, however, deter us from our responsibility to validate the election of Joe Biden. … To that end, in consultation with Leader Hoyer and Whip Clyburn and after calls to the Pentagon, the Justice Department and the Vice President, we have decided we should proceed tonight at the Capitol once it is cleared for use. Leader Hoyer will be sending out more guidance later today.”

Senate Republicans who planned to object to the election in multiple states Biden won withdraw their objections. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell said on the Senate floor:

“United States Senate will not be intimidated. We will not be kept out of this chamber by thugs, mobs or threats. … We will certify the winner of the 2020 presidential election.

After Congress finally certified President Biden’s election in the early morning hours of February 7, Führer Trump said:

“Even though I totally disagree with the outcome of the election, and the facts bear me out, nevertheless there will be an orderly transition on January 20th.”

Führer Trump’s statement was posted to Twitter by aides after his personal account was locked by TWITTER for posting messages that appeared to justify the assault on the seat of the nation’s democracy.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

It is clear that Trump is the first fascist ever elected President of the United States who put himself above the law and his own country and who has no respect for our constitution nor free elections.

Trumps strongest and closest allies and supporters need to come to their senses and the realization that Trump is a traitor to his own country, to them, to all of us and to our democracy. Attempting to set aside the vote of the American people was an attempt to undermine our very democracy. It was a coup d’é·tat that failed. The same goes for the clown car full of the Republican House and Senate members who initially sought to seek to set aside the 2020 victory of Joe Biden by voting not to certify the electoral college vote. Their conduct likewise is nothing less than in insurrection or rebellion against the United States and are democratic form of government. They too should be removed from office.

What happened in Washington, DC on January 6, 2021, and the images of what happened are indeed another “day of infamy”, such as Pearl Harbor, that will no doubt be remembered for decades to come. Pearl Harbor was an attack on our country by a foreign enemy that started World War II.

What is shameful and disgusting is that what unfolded on January 6 was an attack on our country, our very democracy, by an elected President of the United States who lost his election for a second term and then attempted a COUP D’É·TAT of his successor who won not only the electoral college vote but the popular vote.

Fascist Trump needs to be immediately removed from office by his cabinet as allowed by the 25th Amendment to the United States Constitution. If not, the United States House of Representatives need to Impeach him one again and the United States Senate need to vote to convict so that Trump can be removed from office, lose his lifetime pension of $200,000, his $1 Million in yearly travel expenses, and with a covicton he would be unable to run for any office again in the United States.

Best wishes to President Joe Biden and Vice President Kamala Harris.

POSTSCRIPT

A quick review of the law is in order:

The 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution provides in part:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, … to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same … .”

The federal law against seditious conspiracy can be found in Title 18, U.S.C. § 2384. The federal law includes treason, rebellion, and similar offenses. According to the statutory definition of sedition, it is a crime for two or more people within the jurisdiction of the United States:

• To conspire to overthrow or destroy by force the government of the United States or to level war against them;
• To oppose by force the authority of the United States government; to prevent, hinder, or delay by force the execution of any law of the United States;
… . “

https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/sedition.html#:~:text=Sedition%20is%20a%20serious%20felony,of%20destroying%20or%20overthrowing%20it.

Under the federal criminal law, rebellion or insurrection is also a felony and the federal law provides:

“Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;  and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-2383.html

18 U.S. Code § 2384 entitled Seditious Conspiracy provides:

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

Mayor Keller Seeks To Hire New APD Chief And Chief Public Safety Officer; One Applicant Has History Of Use of Deadly Force Killings Involving Mentally-ILL; Chief Public Safety Officer Position Not Enough

On September 10, Mayor Tim Keller and APD Chief Michael Geier held a press conference to announce that Chief Geier was retiring after 2 years and 9 months as APD Chief. Keller announced a national search would be conducted to find a new chief. During the September 10 press conference, Mayor Tim Keller announced he was appointing First Deputy Harold Medina as Interim APD Chief.

During the September 10 press conference Mayor Keller said in part:

“ … We know reform efforts have hit some snags, and we know there have been back office challenges and distractions. Chief Geier’s retirement comes at the right time for a new phase of leadership to address the old embedded challenges that continue to hamper the department. … .”

https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/chief-geier-forced-out-of-his-position-with-apd/5858023/?cat=500

It was on September 5 Labor Day Holiday weekend that Mayor Tim Keller and CAO Sarita Nair summoned Chief Geier to a city park where Keller, according to Geier, showed up “incognito”, wearing a cap and sunglasses to met with Geier. Keller told Geier he had decided to let Geier go, that his services were no longer needed and it was time for Geier to leave APD. Keller gave Geier the choice of retiring or being fired and he chose retirement.

Within days after being forced out, Geier made the rounds to all local news outlets and gave exclusive interviews. Geier unloaded on Mayor Keller proclaiming that Keller and his Chief Administrative Officer Sarita Nair micro managed the department. Geier also said that First Deputy Chief Harold Medina circumvented all he did to the point of insubordination.

Keller’s removal of Geier as APD Chief was viewed by city hall insiders and political observers as Keller’s first major step to his bid for a second term. Keller saying that the “reform efforts have hit some snags” was a gross understatement if not a downright lie by Keller. City hall confidential sources have confirmed that Mayor Keller was given an advanced briefing that the 12th Federal Monitor’s report on APD’s compliance with the 271 reforms was going to be the most scathing of all 12 reports as to APD’s leadership. It was.

On Friday, October 6, in a hearing on the 12th Federal Monitors Report, the Federal Monitor Ginger told the court:

“We are on the brink of a catastrophic failure at APD. … [The department] has failed miserably in its ability to police itself. … If this were simply a question of leadership, I would be less concerned. But it’s not. It’s a question of leadership. It’s a question of command. It’s a question of supervision. And it’s a question of performance on the street. So as a monitor with significant amount of experience – I’ve been doing this since the ’90s – I would have to be candid with the Court and say we’re in more trouble here right now today than I’ve ever seen.”

PUBLIC INPUT GIVEN ON WHAT DESIRED IN CHIEF

Within days after the departure of Chief Geier, the city posted and advertised the position nationally. The Keller Administration hired a consultant to help search for the City’s next APD Police Chief. The result was 39 applicants who submitted their resumes.

The City conducted more than 40 virtual meetings with community groups and interested parties. According to a city spokesperson, the city received more than 2,200 responses to an online survey seeking feedback on the Chief’s position. City spokeswoman Alicia Manzano said 5 themes emerged from those meetings expressing a desire for a chief to have an understanding:

1. Behavioral health issues.

COMMENTARY: This should come as no surprise. The 2014 Department of Justice of investigation of APD found a “culture of aggression” with APD’s interactions and responses to suspects that were mentally ill and that were having psychotic episodes. APD used deadly force against people who posed a minimal threat, including individuals who posed a threat only to themselves. Two cases in particular highlight the problem: the shooting of homeless camper and mentally ill James Boyd by APD SWAT in the Sandia Mountain foothills and the shooting of military army veteran Ken Ellis, III who was suffering with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The Boyd case resulted in a $5 million dollar settlement to the Boyd family, the Ellis case resulted in a $10 million settlement to the Elis family, both lawsuits file for wrongful death and police misconduct. The two SWAT Officers that killed Boyd were charged with murder but the charges were dismissed after a jury could not reach a verdict and deadlocked.

2. A commitment to de-escalation use by police.

COMMENTARY: The DOJ found APD failed to use deescalating tactics when encountering the mentally ill. The DOJ found APD police officers too often used deadly force in an unconstitutional manner in their use of firearms against the mentally ill. The DOJ consent decree mandates significant training of officers in de-escalation tactics to deal with the mentally ill and mandated behavioral health policies and procedures.

3. Transparency.

COMMENTARY: APD has an extensive history of withholding and delaying damaging information and even going to great lengths to withhold informatikon, especially when it comes to police misconduct cases, releasing lapel camera footage, and has repeatedly delayed the releasing of information within APD Internal Affairs. Repeatedly, the city has been fined over the years for Inspection of Public Records (IPRA) request violations. At one time, the Federal Court Monitor charged APD command staff of delay, diversion and obstruction tactics in the release of information and cooperation.

4. Community policing.

COMMENTARY: The 2014 Department of Justice investigation found that APD was severely shorthanded and was having difficulty in handling the severe spike in calls for service and criminal investigations. In 2017, Tim Keller campaigned to be elected mayor on the platform of increasing the size of the Albuquerque Police Department (APD), returning to community-based policing and promising to bring down skyrocketing crime rates. To that end, the Keller Administration began implementing an $88 million-dollar APD police expansion program increasing the number of sworn police officers from 898 positions filled to 1,200, or by 302 sworn police officers, over a four-year period. Keller promised to increase the number of sworn police in the department to 1,200 by the end of his first term. According to city records and reports, APD has 974 officers at last count. APD is short by upwards of 200 sworn police of what was promised by candidate Tim Keller.

5. Racial equity

COMMENTARY: APD, just like all law enforcement agencies over the country, is under more and more public scrutiny regarding its interactions with minorities. The killings of so many unarmed African Americans has brought forth that scrutiny. It was many organizations involved with minority issues that were instrumental in bringing the Department of Justice to Albuquerque to investigate APD’s use of force and deadly force. Six years ago, APD was sued in Federal Court for “racial profiling” and targeting African Americans and Hispanics involved in Federal narcotics investigations and prosecutions in the South East Heights area, but those civil rights cases were dismissed by the courts with a finding of no racial profiling

https://www.abqjournal.com/1532419/a-tumultuous-year-at-apd-comes-to-a-close.html

PUBLIC CONCERNS MIRROR THE DOJ INVESTGATION FINDINGS

It is not at all surprising that virtually all 5 of the themes the public survey found as to what the public wants in its next Chief hit squarely on the issues identified and involved with the Department of Justice (DOJ) investigation and the Federal Court Approved Settlement Agreement.

On April 10, 2014, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ), Civil Rights Division, submitted a scathing 46-page investigation report on an 18-month civil rights investigation of the Albuquerque Police Department (APD). The investigation was conducted jointly by the DOJ’s Washington Office Civil Rights Division and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of New Mexico.

The link to the DOJ investigation 46-page report is here:

https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/crt/legacy/2014/04/10/apd_findings_4-10-14.pdf

The DOJ reviewed all fatal shootings by officers between 2009 and 2012, and found that officers were not justified under federal law in using deadly force in the majority of those incidents. The investigation found APD’s policies, training, and supervision were insufficient to ensure that officers encountering people with mental illness or in distress do so in a manner that respected their rights and in a manner that was safe for all involved.

A significant number of the use of force cases reviewed by the DOJ involved persons suffering from acute mental illness and who were having a mental health crisis. The DOJ found APD failed to use deescalating tactics when encountering the mentally ill. The DOJ found APD police officers too often used deadly force in an unconstitutional manner in their use of firearms. Officers used deadly force against people who posed a minimal threat, including individuals who posed a threat only to themselves or who were unarmed. Officers were found to have used deadly force in situations where the conduct of the officers heightened the danger and contributed to the need to use force.

What differentiates the DOJ’s investigation of APD from the other federal investigations of police departments and consent decrees is that the other consent decrees involve in one form or another the finding of “racial profiling” and use of excessive force or deadly force against minorities. The DOJ’s finding of a “culture of aggression” within APD dealt with APD’s interactions and responses to suspects that were mentally ill and that were having psychotic episodes.

On November 10, 2014, the City and the Department of Justice entered into a Court Approved Settlement Agreement (CASA) that mandates 271 sweeping reforms of the APD. The CASA was negotiated to be completed within 4 years and after 2 years of consecutive compliance, the case was to be dismissed in November of 2020. Six years have now expired and APD has failed to fully implement the reforms and is not in compliance.

CHIEF APPLICANTS FROM ACROSS THE COUNTRY

On January 1, 2021, the Albuquerque Journal published a front-page story entitled “39 Apply to be Albuquerque’s Top Cop”. The Journal made an Inspection of Public Records Request (IPRA) and the city provided the paper with the resume’s that had been turned in by the applicants on or before December 4. On Wednesday, December 30, the city released the names of 39 applicants.

According to a city spokesperson, a screening process was undertaken. The candidates and their résumés were sorted into 25 “qualified” candidates and 9 “unqualified” candidates. The city gave no specific explanation as to why an applicant was disqualified. The 9 applicants found not to be qualified. Two of those disqualified were identified as David Bibb, the recently ousted chief of the Las Vegas Police Department in New Mexico, and Emil Radosevich, who recently resigned as chief of the Pueblo of Jemez Police Department.

There were 5 applicants who had applied after the Journal’s records request and are identified as : Al Fear, Philip Holmes, Robert Jones, Kenneth McCoy Jr. and Daniel Neill.

The link to the full Journal story is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/1531748/39-apply-to-be-albuquerques-top-cop.html
The story divided the qualifying applicants into 3 categories:

1. Police chiefs of small cities
2. Higher ranking officials within large police departments,
3. Those who have left law enforcement for other professions and who are seeking to return.

In response to an Inspection of Public Records Act (IPRA) request, the Journal received the following list of identified applicants:

SMALL CITY POLICE CHIEFS

1. George Austin, chief of police of the Milton Police Department in Georgia.

2. Roland Camacho, chief of police of the Chambersburg Police Department in Pennsylvania.

3. Joel Fitzgerald Sr., chief of police of the Waterloo Police Department in Iowa. Fitzgerald was police chief in Fort Worth, Texas, but was fired in 2019.

4. Clinton Nichols, chief of police of the Commerce City Police Department in Colorado.

5. Edward Reynolds, chief of police of the Southern University of Shreveport Police Department in Louisiana.

6. Todd Richardson, who was the sheriff of Davis County, Utah, until 2019. He’s now a deputy with the Beaver County Sheriff’s Office.

LARGE POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS:

7. Harold Medina, APD’s interim chief while the search unfolds. Medina previously served as deputy chief of APD and, before that, was Chief of Police for the Pueblo of Laguna.

8. Jason Lando, a commander with the Pittsburgh Bureau of Police.

9. Mark Molinari, a commanding officer at the New York City Police Department.

10. James Rhoden, a commander with the Baltimore Police Department.

11. Michael Rigoli, who recently retired as a lieutenant with the Chicago Police Department.

12. Joseph Sullivan, who recently retired as a deputy commissioner of patrol operations for the Philadelphia Police Department.

13. William Taylor, chief deputy of the DeKalb County Marshal’s Office in Decatur, Georgia.

14. Michele Williams, who retired from the Santa Fe Police Department as a lieutenant. She is suing the city of Santa Fe, alleging her rights as a whistleblower were violated when she was removed from her position for reporting time card fraud and other improprieties.

15. Joseph Lestrange, a division chief of the Homeland Security Investigations transnational organized crime division in Washington, D.C.

16. Albert Pleasant IV, a special agent with the Air Force Office of Special Investigations in Texas.

THOSE WHO HAVE LEFT LAW ENFORCEMENT AND SEEKING TO RETURN

17. Jesus Eduardo Campa, CEO of Americas Best Strategic Security Group in El Paso and executive director for the Council on Law Enforcement Education and Training, a regulatory law enforcement agency for the State of Oklahoma. He served previously as chief of police for the Marshall Police Department and applied to be the chief of police in Santa Fe in 2015.

18.Thomas Cassella, director of security and valet at Caesars Entertainment Horseshoe Casino in Baltimore, Maryland. He worked previously for the Baltimore Police Department for 23 years.

19. Brian Childress, an instructor at the Law Enforcement Command College at Columbus State University in Georgia and an assessor for the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies in Virginia. He served as chief of police for the Valdosta Police Department from 2013 to 2018.

20. Jonathan Lewin, senior public safety adviser for the First Responder Network Authority in Virginia. He spent 15 years with the Chicago Police Department.

21. John Pate, the city manager and director of public safety for city of Opa-locka, Florida. He worked previously for the Cook County Sheriff’s Office and the Village of Phoenix Police Department, both in Illinois.

22. Anthony Schembri, who quotes Rudy Giuliani as saying he’s a “pioneer” and has been appointed to various posts by three governors, two mayors of New York, and more. He was a county administrator and director of public safety for Citrus County, Florida, from 2008 to 2009.

23. George Smith, vice president of Corporate Security Life Safety for the Bank of America in Delaware. He previously spent 27 years with the Radnor Township Police Department.

24. David Williams, a mission assurances division chief for the U.S. Air Force in Nebraska.

KELLERS SEEKS TO APPOINT CHIEF PUBLIC SAFETY OFFICER

On December 11, it was reported that the city is looking to hire a Chief of Public Safety who would oversee the chiefs of the Albuquerque Police Department, the Fire and Rescue Department and the Office of Emergency management. The Chief Public Safety Officer would be a civilian post and report to the city’s Chief Administrative Officer.

According to the job posting on the city’s website, in addition to overseeing the three department heads, the new hire “must coordinate with the Chief of Police to provide strong reform-minded leadership as the department works to achieve and maintain compliance” with the Court Approved Settlement Agreement dictating the police reform effort.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1526078/city-seeking-to-hire-chief-of-public-safety.html

Mayor Keller has said hopes to have the police chief position filled by March but has said he doesn’t have a time frame for when a Chief of Public Safety will be in place. Keller acknowledges that both potions will be hard to recruit because of the city’s out of control crime rates, the reform efforts and the fact that both positions are “at will” positions. Whoever is hired will be at risk of losing their job if Keller does not win a second term.

On May 1, 2018, just a few months after Keller took office, an article on this blog was posted and sent to Keller proposing the exact same thing that Keller is proposing, except with the title “Public Safety Commissioner” and including the creation of an entire Public Safety Department.

Below is the link to the May 1, 2018 blog article:

“Create Department Of Public Safety; Abolish APD Internal Affairs; Create Salary Structure”

https://www.petedinelli.com/2020/12/12/political-plagiarism-is-one-of-the-highest-forms-of-flattery-tim-keller-should-just-listen-from-the-get-go-instead-of-not-being-upfront/

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Historically, when a Mayor appoints a Chief of Police, it generates a significant amount of interest and competition amongst the ambitious command staff, usually with Commanders, now called Captains, and even Lieutenants applying for the job. Further, it is also common that former APD command staff also apply and try to return as Chief, such as Chief Ray Schultz and Chief Michael Geier who both retired from APD to go work for another department only to return a few years later to be Chief. This is not happening now.

HAROLD MEDINA

It is very concerning that Interim APD Chief Harold Medina is the only named applicant for Chief from within the ranks of APD who has applied for the position. Interim Chief Harold Medina has a very troubled past of police officer involved shootings with reactive decision-making and failed leadership resulting in the killing of two mentally ill people having psychotic episodes. Medina was never disciplined for his conduct relating to 2 high profile shootings proclaiming he did nothing wrong.

First, in 2004, then APD Field Officer Harold Medina killed a 14-year-old Cibola High School student in a church who was brandishing a BB Gun. The boy was reported as having a psychotic episode saying he was possessed by demons and went to church for help.

Second, on January 13, 2010, Kenneth Ellis, III, a 25-year-old veteran who was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder and threatening to kill himself holding a gun to his head. Elis was shot and killed by APD police officers and it was then Lieutenant Harold Medina that authorized the use of deadly force against Elis as a tactic to take him into custody. A $10.5 Million dollar judgment was awarded to the Elis family for the shooting. At the time of the Ellis shooting, former APD Chief Michael Geier was on the Force Review Board and he has stated that then Lt. Harold Medina failed in his command conduct and that he should have been disciplined.

Interim Chief Harold Medina spins the two tragedies as a positive credential to run the APD saying because of the shootings he now understands the DOJ reforms, their need and can implement them. Good luck with that! If anything, the two killing should have resulted in Medina being disqualified as an applicant. Truth is, Medina is part of the problem with APD that brought the DOJ here in the first place. Medina has no business being interim Chief let alone being made permanent. Medina helped create, did not stop and he participated the “culture of aggression” and the use of deadly force that resulted in a DOJ investigation.

Medina was never disciplined for his conduct relating to the high-profile shootings. When asked if the mayor’s office was aware of the cases, Keller’s Chief of staff Mike Puelle wrote in a statement:

“Acting Chief Medina has been very open about these lessons learned and how he applies them to the ongoing reform efforts at the department.”

HEAVY HANDED MANAGEMENT STYLE DEMANDING LOYALTY

It is no coincidence that Medina is the only named applicant for Chief that currently works for APD or who has worked for APD in the past. APD Command staff, who wish to remain anonymous, have said that Medina is highly aggressive, demands 100% loyalty, feels he is entitled to the job of Chief. It is said Medina does not tolerate anyone who remotely questions his directives and that he manages with intimidation and coercion. Working for such a Chief no doubt eliminates any potential challengers for APD Chief from within the department.

Interim Chief Harold Medina is part of the very problem that brought the Department of Justice (DOJ) here in the first place. It was the past APD management practices that resulted in the “culture of aggression” found by the Department of Justice that lead to the federal consent decree after 18 police officer involved shootings and the findings of excessive use of force and deadly force by APD. The litany of cases includes 4 Cases where $21.7 Million was paid for APD’s excessive use of force and deadly force and $64 Million for 42 police officer shootings in 10 years.

Any one in APD command staff who assisted, contributed or who did not stop the “culture of aggression” found by the Department of Justice and who has resisted the reform process has no business being APD Chief or Deputy for that matter. Interim Chief Harold Medina was and still is part of the problem with APD. It is not at all likely, despite whatever public comments he makes, that Interim APD Chief Medina will ever get behind the Federal mandated reforms which should disqualify him from being the interim APD Chief and for that matter the new permanent Chief.

OTHER APPLCIANTS OSTENSIBLY HAVE NO POLICE REFORM BACKGROUND

The number one priority of the next full time APD Chief, and in a real sense, the biggest crisis that Chief faces from day one will be implementation of the DOJ mandated reforms. The crisis is very real when the Federal Monitor told the court on October 6, 2020:

“We are on the brink of a catastrophic failure at APD. … [The department] has failed miserably in its ability to police itself. … If this were simply a question of leadership, I would be less concerned. But it’s not. It’s a question of leadership. It’s a question of command. It’s a question of supervision. And it’s a question of performance on the street.”

Based on the listing of the other 38 applicants, it appears none of the applicants has any prior experience or working knowledge dealing with implementation of any federal consent decree and the requirement of constitutional policing training and practices.

If Mayor Tim Keller is indeed sincere in conducting a national search to find someone else other than Interim APD Chief Harold Medina, he should order the national employment search company the city has retained to find qualified law enforcement professionals who have the experience to manage a department in crisis. Experience with a law enforcement department under a DOJ consent decree should be an absolute requirement.

Further, Keller should notify Medina that he has been disqualified from applying for the potion because of his troubling history of excessive use of force and deadly force. Otherwise, it sure does look like Keller is engaged in another sham national search only to appoint and make Harold Medina the permanent chief.

CREATE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY

Creating the position of Chief Public Safety is nearly not enough. There is a need for a complete overhaul and restructuring of APD with the appointment of a new APD Chief, Deputy Chief’s, new Commanders, Lieutenants, a new Academy Director and a 911 manager. The Public Safety Department needs to consist of four civilian staffed divisions and managed by the Public Safety Commissioner:

1. Personnel and training, for recruiting, hiring, internal affairs investigations and police academy;
2. Budget and finance;
3. Information technology support and crime lab; and
4. 911 emergency operations center with a civilian manager.

Every single APD felony unit needs to be increased in personnel by anywhere between 40% and 60%, including the units of Armed Robbery, Auto Theft, Burglary, Homicide, Gang Unit, Narcotics, Property Crimes and Sex Crimes Units.

APD has consistently shown over many years it cannot police itself which contributed to the “culture of aggression” found by the Department of Justice. The APD Internal Affairs Unit needs to be abolished and its functions absorbed by the Office of Inspector General. “Deadly use of force” cases need to continue to be investigated by the Critical Incident Review Team and the final reports with finding and recommendations.

CONCLUSION

Mayor Tim Keller squandered a considerable amount of his political capital given to him with his landslide win in 2017 when he failed to seize immediately after his election the opportunity to make sweeping changes by hiring a new generation of police management , hiring Chief Public Safety Officer and with the creation of a Department of Public Safety. Now Keller’s back is against the wall time wise with only 11 months left of his term as he seeks another term. Anyone who accepts either job will have to take one big leap of faith and hope Keller wins a second term, otherwise they could be out of a job within a few months or weeks after taking it.

Mayor Tim Keller and his Administration need to pay special attention to the survey and the input they have received from the public as to what they want in the next police chief. Keller has now appointed as Interim Chief the one person who embodies what the Department of Justice Reforms are all about when it comes to police misconduct.
Mayor Keller has made it known he is running for a second term. He can not afford to make another mistake with APD management appointments and just give his usual smile and lip service and public relations to the process he has put in place.

In 2020, Dinelli Blog Had 105,793 Total Reader Views, 70,208 Total Blog Visitors; Thanks For Viewing And Visiting; Onto A Better 2021 New Year! PLEASE WEAR THE DAMN MASK!

Führer Trump Commits Acts Of Rebellion And Sedition By Pressuring Georgia Secretary Of State To “Find” 11,780 Votes For Him; Trump’s Republican House And Senate Actions Also Amount To Rebellion And Sedition

The 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution provides in part:

“No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, … to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same … .”

The federal law against seditious conspiracy can be found in Title 18, U.S.C. § 2384. The federal law includes treason, rebellion, and similar offenses. According to the statutory definition of sedition, it is a crime for two or more people within the jurisdiction of the United States:

• To conspire to overthrow or destroy by force the government of the United States or to level war against them;

• To oppose by force the authority of the United States government; to prevent, hinder, or delay by force the execution of any law of the United States;

… . “

https://criminal.findlaw.com/criminal-charges/sedition.html#:~:text=Sedition%20is%20a%20serious%20felony,of%20destroying%20or%20overthrowing%20it.

Under the federal criminal law, rebellion or insurrection is also a felony and the federal law provides:

“Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both;  and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

https://codes.findlaw.com/us/title-18-crimes-and-criminal-procedure/18-usc-sect-2383.html

FEDERAL VOTER FRAUD LAWS

There are 2 separate federal laws that deal with voter fraud as follows:

18 U.S. Code § 594 – Intimidation of voters

Whoever intimidates, threatens, coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any other person for the purpose of interfering with the right of such other person to vote or to vote as he may choose, or of causing such other person to vote for, or not to vote for, any candidate for the office of President, Vice President, Presidential elector, Member of the Senate, Member of the House of Representatives, Delegate from the District of Columbia, or Resident Commissioner, at any election held solely or in part for the purpose of electing such candidate, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

52 U.S. Code § 20511 – Criminal penalties

A person, including an election official, who in any election for Federal office—

(1)knowingly and willfully intimidates, threatens, or coerces, or attempts to intimidate, threaten, or coerce, any person for—

(A) registering to vote, or voting, or attempting to register or vote;
(B) urging or aiding any person to register to vote, to vote, or to attempt to register or vote; or
(C)exercising any right under this chapter; or

(2)knowingly and willfully deprives, defrauds, or attempts to deprive or defraud the residents of a State of a fair and impartially conducted election process, by—

(A) the procurement or submission of voter registration applications that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held; or
(B) the procurement, casting, or tabulation of ballots that are known by the person to be materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent under the laws of the State in which the election is held

FÜHRER TRUMP COMMITS ACTS OF REBELLION AND SEDITION OR VOTER FRAUD

The Washington Post reported that on Saturday, January 2, 2020, President Trump held an hour-long phone call with Georgia’s Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. Trump was joined on the call by White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and several lawyers, including longtime conservative operative attorneys Cleta Mitchell and Georgia attorney Kurt Hilbert. Raffensperger was joined by his office’s general counsel, Ryan Germany, and Deputy Secretary of State Jordan Fuchs. The call was recorded.

On the call, Trump urges Raffensperger to alter the outcome of the presidential vote in Georgia. The Washington Post report on the recording states in part:

“Trump alternately berated Raffensperger, tried to flatter him, begged him to act and threatened him with vague criminal consequences if the secretary of state refused to pursue his false claims, and at one-point warning that Raffensperger was taking “a big risk.” Throughout the call, Raffensperger and his office’s general counsel rejected Trump’s assertions, explaining that Trump was is relying on debunked conspiracy theories and that President-elect Joe Biden’s 11,779-vote victory in Georgia was fair and accurate.

On the call, Trump details an exhaustive list of disinformation and conspiracy theories to support his position. He claims without evidence that he had won Georgia by at least a half-million votes. He floated a barrage of assertions that have been investigated and disproved: that thousands of dead people voted; that an Atlanta election worker scanned 18,000 forged ballots three times each and “100 percent” were for Biden; that thousands more voters living out of state came back to Georgia illegally just to vote in the election.

The secretary of state repeatedly sought to correct Trump, saying at one point, “Mr. President, the problem you have with social media, they — people can say anything.”

“Oh this isn’t social media,” Trump retorted. “This is Trump media. It’s not social media. It’s really not. It’s not social media. I don’t care about social media. I couldn’t care less.”

At another point, Trump claimed that votes were scanned three times:

“Brad, why did they put the votes in three times? You know, they put ’em in three times.”

Raffensperger responded: “Mr. President, they did not. We did an audit of that and we proved conclusively that they were not scanned three times.”

The link to the entire Washington Post article is here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-transcript-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/2768e0cc-4ddd-11eb-83e3-322644d82356_story.html

Georgia has already conducted 3 recounts, and the results were the same: Joe Biden won the state’s popular vote with 49.5% (2,473,633 votes) to Trumps 49.3% (2,461,854) thereby winning all 16 of Georgia’s electoral votes.

EGREGIOUS COMMENTS

Some of the most egregious comments and requests made by Trump during the January 2 telephone call with the Georgia Secretary of Sates that amount to sedition or rebellion to set aside a lawful election are:

“So, look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have. Because we won the state”

“Fellas, I need 11,000 votes … Give me a break. We have that in spades already.”

“The ballots are corrupt, and they’re brand new, and they don’t have seals, and there’s a whole thing with the ballots. But the ballots are corrupt. And you are going to find that they are — which is totally illegal — it is more illegal for you than it is for them because, you know, what they did and you’re not reporting it. That’s a criminal, that’s a criminal offense. And you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer. And that’s a big risk.

… I’m notifying you that you’re letting it happen. So look. All I want to do is this. I just want to find 11,780 votes, which is one more than we have because we won the state.

And flipping the state is a great testament to our country because, you know, this is — it’s a testament that they can admit to a mistake or whatever you want to call it. If it was a mistake, I don’t know. A lot of people think it wasn’t a mistake. It was much more criminal than that. But it’s a big problem in Georgia, and it’s not a problem that’s going away. I mean, you know, it’s not a problem that’s going away.

“So what are we going to do here, folks? I only need 11,000 votes. Fellas, I need 11,000 votes. Give me a break. You know, we have that in spades already. Or we can keep it going, but that’s not fair to the voters of Georgia because they’re going to see what happened, and they’re going to see what happened.”

“So tell me, Brad, what are we going to do? We won the election, and it’s not fair to take it away from us like this. And it’s going to be very costly in many ways. And I think you have to say that you’re going to reexamine it, and you can reexamine it, but reexamine it with people that want to find answers, not people that don’t want to find answers.”

“. .. we can play this game with the courts, but why do you say that? First of all, they don’t even assign us a judge. They don’t even assign us a judge. But why wouldn’t you . . . Hey Brad, why wouldn’t you want to check out [name redacted] ? And why wouldn’t you want to say, hey, if in fact, President Trump is right about that, then he wins the state of Georgia, just that one incident alone without going through hundreds of thousands of dropped ballots.”

“You just say, you stick by, I mean I’ve been watching you, you know, you don’t care about anything. “Your numbers are right.” But your numbers aren’t right. They’re really wrong, and they’re really wrong, Brad. And I know this phone call is going nowhere other than, other than ultimately, you know — Look, ultimately, I win, okay? Because you guys are so wrong. And you treated this. You treated the population of Georgia so badly. You, between you and your governor, who is down at 21, he was down 21 points. And like a schmuck, I endorsed him, and he got elected, but I will tell you, he is a disaster.”

“Well, under law, you’re not allowed to give faulty election results, okay? You’re not allowed to do that. And that’s what you done. This is a faulty election result. And honestly, this should go very fast. You should meet tomorrow because you have a big election coming up, and because of what you’ve done to the president — you know, the people of Georgia know that this was a scam — and because of what you’ve done to the president, a lot of people aren’t going out to vote. And a lot of Republicans are going to vote negative because they hate what you did to the president. Okay? They hate it. And they’re going to vote. And you would be respected. Really respected, if this thing could be straightened out before the election. You have a big election coming up on Tuesday. And I think that it is really is important that you meet tomorrow and work out on these numbers. Because I know, Brad, that if you think we’re right, I think you’re going to say, and I’m not looking to blame anybody, I’m just saying, you know, and, you know, under new counts, and under new views, of the election results, we won the election. You know? It’s very simple. We won the election.”

“So tell me, Brad, what are we going to do? We won the election, and it’s not fair to take it away from us like this. … And it’s going to be very costly in many ways. And I think you have to say that you’re going to reexamine it, and you can reexamine it, but reexamine it with people that want to find answers, not people who don’t want to find answers.”

“You should want to have an accurate election. And you’re a Republican … You know what they did, and you’re not reporting it. That’s a criminal offense, and you can’t let that happen. … And you can’t let that happen. That’s a big risk to you and to Ryan, your lawyer.”

“The people of Georgia are angry, the people in the country are angry,” Trump said. “And there’s nothing wrong with saying, you know, um, that you’ve recalculated.”

“We won the election, and it’s not fair to take it away from us like this.”

“You have a big election coming up and because of what you’ve done to the president — you know, the people of Georgia know that this was a scam. … Because of what you’ve done to the president, a lot of people aren’t going out to vote, and a lot of Republicans are going to vote negative, because they hate what you did to the president. Okay? They hate it. And they’re going to vote. And you would be respected, really respected, if this can be straightened out before the election.”

The link to the Washington Post transcript is here:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-raffensperger-call-georgia-vote/2021/01/03/d45acb92-4dc4-11eb-bda4-615aaefd0555_story.html

TRUMP THREATENS LAWSUITS

Within hours after the Washington Post published its story on the recorded one-hour discussion between President Donald Trump and Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger it was announced that Trump intends to sue Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger for recording their phone call.

Trump intends to filed a state law suite and a federal lawsuit against the Georgia Secretary of State to block the release of the recording where Trump is heard pressuring the state election head to “recalculate” the votes and demanded he commit a crime and “find” votes. It is being alleged that the telephone conference call was secretly recorded and was a “confidential settlement discussion” of litigation that is still pending. At this point, no one really knows who released the audio or for that matter who recorded it.

Democrat Jon Ossoff who is running against Senator David Perdue in one of the Georgia Senate runoffs that will determine what party will control the Senate had this to say:

“At this moment, when the President of the United States calls on Georgia’s election officials and tries to intimidate them to change the result of the election to disenfranchise Georgia voters, to disenfranchise Black voters in Georgia who delivered this state for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, that is a direct attack on our democracy.”

Ossoff also called on Senator David Perdue, who he is running against, and the other Georgia Senator Kelly Loeffler to defend voters from those types of actions.

https://www.11alive.com/article/news/politics/elections/trump-phone-call-brad-raffersperger-lawsuit/85-a0c1c287-b69f-470e-a8b6-d1cdf9df1b11

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-sues-georgia-official-recording/

NOVEMBER 3RD ELECTION WAS THE MOST SECURE IN AMERICAN HISTORY

On November 12, The Election Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council (GCC) Executive Committee – Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency issued a statement regarding the 2020 Presidential election and said:

“… The November 3rd election was the most secure in American history. … There is no evidence that any voting system deleted or lost votes, changed votes, or was in any way compromised. … While we know there are many unfounded claims and opportunities for misinformation about the process of our elections, we can assure you we have the utmost confidence in the security and integrity of our elections …”

The link to the full statement is here:

https://www.cisa.gov/news/2020/11/12/joint-statement-elections-infrastructure-government-coordinating-council-election

JOINT SESSION OF CONGRESS TO CERTIFY ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE

On Wednesday, January 6, a joint session of the United State House of Representatives and United State Senate will met to formally count the electoral votes to certify President-elect Joe Biden’s victory over President Trump. Vice President Pence, as president of the Senate, will preside over the proceeding.

Upwards of 140 of the 196 Republican members of the House of Representatives will object and will vote against counting the electoral votes to certify President-elect Joe Biden’s victory. New Mexico’s newly sworn in Republican right wing flake of a Congresswoman Yvette Harrel from New Mexico’s Southern Mew Mexico District has announced she will be one of the 140 Republican members of congress to vote against certifying President Joe Biden’s victory. Yvett Harrel told Fox News in an interview in December that her 2018 defeat by Democrat Xochitl Torres Small was without question the result of fraud, a baseless charge that is a total lie, just like the one Harell has bought into about Trump’s loss.

On Saturday, January 2, 2021, 11 Republican senators demanded that a commission to audit the results of the 2020 election be convened, otherwise they will object to the Electoral College votes that declared President-elect Joe Biden the winner. The Senators want Congress to create a commission with “full investigatory and fact-finding authority, to conduct an emergency 10-day audit of the election returns in the disputed states.” This is after all states have certified their votes, recounts have occurred in many and over 50 lawsuits have been dismissed and thrown out of court for failure to present any evidence of fraud.

If such a panel is not established, the Republican Senators threatened “to reject the electors from disputed states as not ‘regularly given’ and ‘lawfully certified’ the statutory requisite, unless and until that emergency 10-day audit is completed.”

Only 1 house member and 1 US Senator are required to mount an objection when Congress counts the votes.

The actions and demands of all the Republican lawmakers are tied directly to President Donald Trump’s claims that the 2020 election was rigged and the election was stolen from him in the key battleground states that voted for Biden. Over 50 federal lawsuits file by the Trump campaign challenging the state election have been dismissed and thrown out of court because there was virtually no evidence of election fraud. Election officials from all the battleground states, the Electoral College, the Justice Department, the Department of Homeland Security, and the US Supreme Court have found virtually no evidence of election fraud.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/gop-senators-threaten-object-electoral-college-results-if-commission-not-n1252667

CONGRESSIONAL PROCESS TO CERTIFY ELECTORAL COLLEGE VOTE EXPLAINED

“On January 6 of each year following a presidential election, Congress convenes a joint session to count electoral votes and confirm the result of the presidential election. Congress has the discretion to move the date of the session by law, as it did in 2013 when the joint session was held on January 4. In these sessions, according to the Electoral Count Act of 1887, members of Congress may object to statewide election results or specific electoral votes in a particular state or the District of Columbia.

Specifically, during the session one member of the U.S. House and one member of the U.S. Senate must submit a written objection after the body reads the vote count from a particular state or D.C.

Once a House member and Senator submit an objection, the two chambers of Congress separate to debate for two hours and to vote on whether to continue counting the votes in light of the objection. Both chambers must vote by a simple majority to concur with the objection for it to stand, otherwise the objection fails.

The newly elected Congress conducts this process. On January 3, all the newly elected members of Congress were sworn in. Following the 2020 elections, Democrats retained a majority in the House of Representatives. Republicans would control the Senate during this joint session, regardless of the results of the January 5 Georgia runoff elections since Vice President Mike Pence (R) would still be in office to act as a potential tie-breaking vote

If both chambers of Congress affirm the objection and the objection results in no one candidate receiving the necessary 270-vote Electoral College majority, the 12th Amendment dictates a congressional process for selecting a president and vice president.”

The link to the quoted source material is here:

https://ballotpedia.org/Can_members_of_Congress_object_to_Electoral_College_results%3F_(2020)

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

There is little to no doubt that Trump’s one hour conversation with Georgia RepublicaN Secretary of State Raffensperger has placed him in serious criminal jeopardy. It clear from the recorded conversation that Trump made a threat of criminal consequences if the Raffensperger did not act. The conversation was also a clear attempt at extortion when Trump threatened to deploy the Justice Department to launch an investigation. The entire one hour recorded conversation taken as a whole is evidence that Trump knowingly and intentionally attempted to corrupt the integrity of a federal election in a state that the results have been recounted 3 time and already been certified.

If there were any doubts that Trump is a fascist, those doubts should be clearly laid to rest with his act of sedition and rebellion in trying to coerce and force the Republican Georgia Secretary of State to “find 11,780 votes” that would allow him to win the State’s electoral college votes. The January 2 phone call recording of Trump is clear and undisputed evidence that Trump will say anything, do anything, lie about anything and coerce anyone, in a desperate attempt to hold on to and cling to power. Trump’s conduct and pressure to set aside the 2020 election results to remain in office is nothing less than insurrection or rebellion against the United States, the Constitution and our right to vote. Trump wants to disenfranchise any one who did not vote for him, much like what Putin does in Russia to hold on to power.

President Donald Trump’s Republican allies in the House and Senate have zero chance of changing the results of the Presidential election. Simply put, Joe Biden is the next President of the United States. The antics of the Republicans can only delay by a few hours, perhaps a day, the inevitable affirmation of Biden as the Electoral College winner and thus the next President of the United States. President elect Biden not only won the electoral college but the national vote as well by over 7 million votes.

Trumps strongest and closest allies and supporters need to come to their senses and the realization that Trump is a traitor to his own country, to them, to all of us and to our democracy. Attempting to set aside the vote of the American people is undermining our very democracy. The same goes for the clown car full of the Republican House and Senate members who are seeking to set aside the 2020 victory of Joe Biden by voting not to certify the electoral college vote. Their conduct likewise is nothing less than in insurrection or rebellion against the United States and are democratic form of government.

Führer Trump has really stepped into one big pile of excrement with his call to the Georgia Secretary of State to pressure him to change the outcome of already certified election results. At this point, do not be surprised if Führer Trump issues a pardon not only for himself but also all those who were on the the phone call with him.

In 2020, Dinelli Blog Had 105,793 Total Reader Views, 70,208 Total Blog Visitors; Thanks For Viewing And Visiting; Onto A Better 2021 New Year! PLEASE WEAR THE DAMN MASK!

County Commissioner Charlene Pyskoty Guest Column: Bernalillo County’s Response to Covid-19

Since January 1, 2019 Charlene Pyskoty has been the Bernalillo County Commissioner for District 5. On Jan. 14, 2020, Commissioner Pyskoty was elected Bernalillo County Board Vice Chair. Charlene Pyskoty is a licensed mental health therapist in private practice. Commissioner Pyskoty has spent nearly 20 years as a licensed mental health therapist. She holds a Master’s degrees in Public Health and Sociology. She has been successfully self-employed for most of her career, as well as working in such diverse industries as academic and market research, advertising and publishing, and education. Pyskoty loves research and data, and she loves helping her community thrive. Her office is in Albuquerque, and her home is in Tijeras where she lives with her husband. Charlene is on both sides of her district every day and appreciates the geographic and demographic diversity of District 5.

Bernalillo County Vice Chair Charlene Pyskoty submitted the below guest column for publication on this blog:

(EDITOR’S NOTE: The opinions expressed in this article are those of County Commissioner Pyskoty and do not necessarily reflect those of the political blog www.petedinelli.com. Commissioner Pyskoty has not been compensated for her column).

“On March 17, 2020, I convened an Emergency Meeting of the Bernalillo County Board of Commissioners for the purpose of declaring Bernalillo County an emergency area due to the Covid-19 pandemic and allowing the County Manager, Julie Morgas Baca, emergency powers to act swiftly in a crisis situation. On that date, there were 14 cases of Covid-19 in Bernalillo County.

A news reporter asked me after the meeting if I had acted too quickly in calling the meeting, if I was overreacting to something that would turn out to be nothing. I responded that I hoped that would prove to be the case. I would have been happy to be wrong, but, as a public health professional, the numbers were trending upward and community spread seemed inevitable.

As I write this, on December 29, 2020, Bernalillo County has reported 40,038 total cases, and New Mexico has experienced 2,403 deaths attributed to Covid-19, with 139,875 cases statewide.

Since that day in March when a public health emergency was declared, Bernalillo County has worked tirelessly to stop the spread of Covid-19, as well as keeping life as normal as possible for our residents.

Bernalillo County took the lead in distributing PPE and creating safe environments for our essential workers. We worked continuously to protect MDC inmates and staff from infection. We worked with APS to provide food, childcare, and meaningful learning experiences for students.

Staff from our Fire Department were deployed throughout the state of New Mexico to train assisted-living facilities on Covid-safe practices. Bernalillo County worked with the State of New Mexico to distribute meals to senior citizens and to provide Covid testing to the public. We worked with other teams and agencies to get clean water and food to the people of To’Hajiilee, which culminated in the agreement to build a pipeline for plentiful, potable water to this part of the Navajo Nation in far-western Bernalillo County.

With our CARES Grant allocation of nearly $32 million, we supported small businesses with grants for basic expenses and for materials to expand outdoor dining and other resources to continue Covid-safe operations. Grants were given to mental health providers, non-profits, employees, and people who just needed to make ends meet.

We kept the county running with the provision of essential services, collected property taxes, and ran safe and secure elections that have withstood lawsuits, challenges, and audits.

Our first responders continued to work, day in and day out, keeping residents safe. Building permits got issued, trash services continued, and marriage licenses brought couples together for better or worse during the most unprecedented time of our lives.

Under the direction of our County Manager, all employees who were able to work remotely, worked from home. Our IT department made sure we were all equipped with internet access, and our media gurus and administrative staff made sure our Zoom meetings complied with laws regarding public access and input to open meetings.

During the past year, our County employees have been busy. There have been no layoffs, and each employee has earned their paycheck performing their usual duties, or temporarily working in a Covid-related position, like managing our wellness hotels for homeless families. I think we have worked harder this year than ever before, maintaining our usual jobs, plus the added duties related to Covid.

For my part, my assistants and I helped hand out grab-n-go lunches and masks at community centers and strip malls in my district. We helped sanitize voting booths on election day. I spearheaded communications on safety tips for grocery stores. I initiated the placement of APS Wi-Fi buses at the community centers in the East Mountains to help provide reliable internet access.

I’ve been working on developing housing assistance for those in need and I’ve supported many initiatives for putting CARES money into the physical, mental, and economic health of our communities and our small businesses.

We at the County look forward to facilitating the Covid vaccine to our residents. We look forward to gathering once again as a community. We look forward to a renewed economy, with a new appreciation for our small businesses, restaurants, and entertainment.

Next year, our new facilities at Alvarado Square will open, our lovely Tiny Home Village will be a thriving community, and new businesses like Amazon and NM Fresh Foods will be contributing jobs and money to our economy. Who knows? Kirtland might even have a Space Force!

Please do your part to make 2021 a year that we can truly celebrate. Wear your mask, keep your distance, wash your hands, stay home if you can, and take the vaccine when it is available. I wish you and yours a very happy, healthy, safe, and prosperous new year. Cheers!”

Charlene Pyskoty, MPH, LPCC
Bernalillo County Commissioner, District 5

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The Covid 19 pandemic is not the only major health crisis that the County Commission is dealing with and where Commissioner Pyskoty back ground will come in handy.

Studies suggest that nearly 50% of Bernalillo County residents needing mental health or addiction treatment services are not getting the help they need because of gaps in New Mexico’s behavioral health care. Untreated behavioral health conditions have led to increased and sometimes tragic interactions with law enforcement, over incarceration, overuse of hospital emergency and inpatient services, and unnecessary suffering on the part of patients and their families.

On February 26, 2015, the Bernalillo County Commission approved a 1/8% gross receipts tax increase on a 3-2 vote to fund new behavioral and mental health services to improve access to mental and behavioral health care services in the county. The tax generates approximately $20 million annually.

The 1/8th% gross receipts tax was enacted to be used for the purpose of providing more mental and behavioral health services for adults and children in the Albuquerque and Bernalillo County area. The intent is to provide a safety net system for those in need of mental health not otherwise funded in New Mexico.

Bernalillo County Commissioner Charlene Pyskoty’s experience in public health no doubt comes at a critical time as the county decides how to deal with the Covid Pandemic but the mental health and addiction treatment services.

In 2020, Dinelli Blog Had 105,793 Total Reader Views, 70,208 Total Blog Visitors; Thanks For Viewing And Visiting; Onto A Better 2021 New Year! PLEASE WEAR THE DAMN MASK!

HAPPY 2021 NEW YEAR TO ALL!

On November 16, 2016 www.Pete Dinelli.com was launched as political blog. The blog was launched because of the belief the local news outlets gloss over way too much without getting into the real substance of stories. The local media all too often ignore analysis of what is being reported and do not have the time nor space to report details and gloss over information out of sure laziness.

The blog does not generate income, there is no advertising, no subscription fees and it is absolutely free to anyone who wants to read it and for that matter wants to share the articles. The blog is maintained by a professional site manager that charges a monthly fee.

The year 2020 proved to be a wild and wonderful year that saw a huge spike in blog article readership and visitors at www.PeteDinelli.com. The most common question is how many people actually read the articles or go to the blog site?

The blog has a tabulator that has been installed by the internet web manager that tabulates and reports to subscribers. The tabulator reports on days, weeks, months and years of views and shares of articles and by visitors. The tabulator breaks the numbers down into two major categories of VIEWS and VISITORS.

A VIEW is counted when a visitor to the blog loads or reloads an article to be read.

A VISITOR is counted when a user or browser for the first time makes a visit in a given period.

The tabulator counts by day, week, month, or full year.

The articles are first posted on the internet blog and then posted on FACEBOOK which is separate from the blog.

MAJOR SPIKE IN READERSHIP IN 2020

In a little over 4 full years of the blog, the number of VIEWS, or article “reads”, more than tripled from 30,411 in 21017 to 105,793 in 2020. The number of VISITORS, or first-time visitors to the blog, more than doubled from 15,807 in 2017 to 70,208 in 2020.

Following are the tabulator numbers for the 4 full calendar years:

2017: 30,411 TOTAL VIEWS, 15,807 TOTAL VISITORS

2018: 42,397 TOTAL VIEWS, 26,092 TOTAL VISITORS

2019: 68,622 TOTAL VIEWS, 43,227 TOTAL VISITORS

2020: 105,793 TOTAL VIEWS, 70,208 TOTAL VISITORS

The blog does have a “CONTACT” link on the web page at www.PeteDinelli.com where anyone can send a message and make comments on articles that allows further contact and messaging. Suggestion on articles or information for articles is always appreciated.

2020 was the first year that a number of readers submitted “guest columns” on varying topics of interest to them, some in opposition to blog articles published. The guest columns have turn out to be very successful. The guest columns are not paid for and what is submitted is only edited as to format and not content.

TIMELY NEWS TOPICS GOAL OF ARTICLES

Since the blog started on November 16, 2016, there have been written and published 1,096 blog articles. Many news reporters and politicos have said the articles are way too long for “news” articles and no one will read them. At first, that was very true, but no longer if the statistics for the las 4 years are to be believed. The purpose and intent of the blog which is to inform, share research and institutional knowledge and lessons learned as a public figure for 28 years and a licensed attorney for 44 years.

The goal from day one of the blog has been to be informative and to give insightful political analysis relying on institutional knowledge after 28 years in government, and knowledge as former elected official, public servant and a 44-year career as a licensed attorney. It is to be informative than just a political gossip column.

The approach taken with the articles is to first report on current events with research and then followed by “ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY”. The commentary is used to suggest solutions to problems identified. One elected official said, “I read another blogger for the political gossip and your blog for the facts and research.” I take that as a compliment.

The single most common remark I get from people is that they read the blog articles, they do not always agree with what I have to say or my opinions, but enjoy reading it. I have never hidden the fact that I am a progressive Democrat especially on social issues and civil rights issues, which explains those that disagree with what I may say, especially conservative Republicans. The blog is not a Democrat, Republican or Independent blog, but my blog.

The blog articles are always posted on my FACEBOOK page to 5,000 FACEBOOK friends to see and other FACEBOOK pages. The blog reaches thousands more on the internet. I email the articles to those whose names are actually mentioned and include government officials and elected officials who I think may be interested in the topic and who may want to take issue.

The blog articles are not written to please all the people who read them all the time. The articles are an effort to promote civil discussion. In addition to “guest opinion columns” from others, I also submit Guest Opinion Columns to the Albuquerque Journal. The Journal has been very accommodating over the last 4 years, has published them and I then publish them again on the blog.

Our First Amendment Freedom of Speech is the most important right we have as citizens. Being fully retired, I enjoy my freedom of speech to say what I want, when I want and how I want without any fear of reprisal, something I had never experienced as a public or elected official and especially when I was a judge.

I do get very frustrated finding clerical and spelling errors after I publish the article and try to correct them as soon as I can. The mistakes are the hazard of doing your own editing and kicking out articles on an almost daily basis. All the articles are posted and can still be read at www.PeteDinelli.com The blog does have a search engine block in the upright hand corner.

The blog has some detractors, but that is to be expected whenever political opinions are expressed . I always tell people who “unload” on me about an article, there is no need to get upset and if you do not like what I write, then don’t read the blog articles and unfriend me on FACEBOOK. I do want to tell readers I am not a communist, I am not a socialist, I am not a fascist and being called a “libitard” is just plain stupid. I am an American who deeply loves my country, this great democracy of ours and very proud that it survived the last 4 years.

TOPICS REPORTED

Over the last 4 years, the blog has covered all sorts of topics including:

The 2020 Presidential Election
The President
The Governor
The Legislative sessions
The City Council
The Mayor
The Albuquerque Police Department
The District Attorney’s Office
The criminal justice system
The Judicial System
The Pandemic
APD Overtime abuse
New Mexico politics
National news and the press
City budgets and finance
Albuquerque Public Schools
The University of New Mexico
Reports on the Court hearings on the Department of Justice consent decree
The 12 Federal Court monitor’s reports
The ART Bus project
Freedom of Speech
Freedom of Religion
The homeless crisis
The Railyards Development
Downtown Redevelopment
City history
The minimum wage
Mandatory sick leave
Public financed campaigns
City election code reform
City and state economic development
Gun control legislation
Sanctuary city
Immigration reform
Mass shootings
Legalization of marijuana
The war on drugs
City crime rates
City zoning issues
Nuisance abatement laws and actions
The city and state economy
Economic development proposals and projects
The file industry in New Mexico
The public education system
UNM athletics
Mental and behavioral health care services,
Taxation
State elections and issues
PERA reform and solvency issues
Liquor License Reform
Bail bond reform
The Department of Justice Consent decree
Tributes to family and friends

CONCLUSION

I am truly humbled by the sure number of views and shares that I have had over the last 4 years. I am also very proud of the steady increase for each year. To all those who read the blog, THANK YOU for reading. To my FACEBOOK friends, please follow me on FACEBOOK and share the blog articles whenever you can!

A special thanks goes to Wayne Scheiner and his advertising firm for helping set up the blog over 4 years ago!

PLEASE WEAR THE DAMN MASK AND GET THE VACCINE SO THAT I CAN GET OUT OF THE HOUSE AND START TRAVELING AGAIN!

HAPPY NEW YEAR!

A Bi Partisan Approach To Working Together To Better Criminal Justice System

On Monday, December 14, the Albuquerque Journal publish a guest column on its editorial page making suggestions to improve our criminal justice system. The guest column was written by Democrat New Mexico State Representative Damon Ely and Republican Brenda Boatman, the Community Engagement Director for the Americans for Prosperity, New Mexico. Following is the guest column:

“Working Together To Better Criminal Justice System”

In 2018, we ran against each other for a seat in the New Mexico State House – Democrat vs. Republican. It goes without saying that we have disagreements on a number of issues. But there are areas where we believe people from across the political spectrum can work together to solve problems facing New Mexico. One of those is criminal justice reform.

Let’s start with the broad goals. Both sides should want swift and certain justice, improvements to public safety and efficient use of taxpayer money.

Due to the economic impact of COVID-19, New Mexico is anticipating revenue shortfalls. Corrections and the criminal justice system are a significant portion of the state budget, and squarely in the crosshairs of potential cuts. Now is the time to revisit our goals and priorities.

Here is what we would propose to make our criminal justice system smarter on crime and softer on taxpayers:

• Expand citations in lieu of arrest authority for law enforcement. Give law enforcement officers more freedom to cite and release individuals suspected of lower-level crimes, rather than book them into jail. This will allow law enforcement to focus on criminal activity that harms public safety and reduce the number of negative interactions between officers and their community.

• Modify how certain crimes are defined and charged. Many states have right-sized the punishment associated with certain lower-level offenses, such as drug and property crimes. This can include increasing the property theft threshold for what dollar amount of theft classifies as a felony. More than 35 states have increased their property theft threshold, while property crime continues to decrease. Making simple drug possession a misdemeanor can save our state millions of dollars without threatening public safety, while equipping people to more effectively overcome a substance-use disorder.

• Invest and expand alternatives to prison and then carefully and independently monitor outcomes. Incarceration is expensive and, by itself, not likely to reduce recidivism. Rather than locking people up, we should invest in diversion programs such as drug courts, mental health courts, and juvenile diversion courts that help people contribute to their communities. These programs are significantly less expensive over the long run and have been shown to reduce recidivism compared to prison. Moreover, we should ensure lawmakers have access to real-time data that will tell us what programs are effective, what can be done to improve programs, and what programs are not working.

• Remove sentencing enhancements for nonviolent offenses. Give judges the discretion to deviate from sentencing enhancements when it is in the best interest of justice. Forcing individuals to serve sentences that don’t match the severity of their crime benefits no one. We can preserve public safety and allow for more proportional sentences that don’t strain taxpayer resources.

• Strengthen community supervision. Finally, we should reduce revocations to prison from community supervision. Revocations for technical violations are a main driver of many state prison populations. Imprisoning large numbers of individuals based on non-criminal actions does not increase public safety. Lawmakers can also push for probation reform for good behavior and preventing people from going back to jail for technical violations while on probation, giving courts needed flexibility to release people who’ve shown themselves to be adequately reformed.

The point of these reforms is to get us out of the ineffective war of words about who is “tougher on crime,” which is both expensive and ineffective. We are wasting limited taxpayer money and unintentionally creating career criminals.

We need to be smarter about crime. Lawmakers have an opportunity to make our state safer and give thousands of New Mexicans the tools to successfully reintegrate into their communities and return to their families.

While we may not agree on everything, we are committed to bringing people together to make our criminal justice system more just.

The link to the Alb. Journal guest column is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/1526480/working-together-to-better-criminal-justice-system.html

ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

Democrat New Mexico State Representative Damon Ely and Republican Brenda Boatman are commended for the bi-partisan attitude and approach to working together to better our criminal justice system. They should not stop with the guest column.

Virtually all of the suggestion made in the Ely – Boatman guest column have real merit and are worthy of consideration. With that said, New Mexico State Representative Damon Ely can show real leadership and introduce legislation that embodies the proposals for the upcoming 2021 session that begins on January 21, 2021. Asking Brenda Boatman to testify before legislative committees would further their bi partisan effort. Securing Governor Michell Lujan’s support she also be a top priority.