About Pete Dinelli

Pete Dinelli was born and raised in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is of Italian and Hispanic descent. He is a 1970 graduate of Del Norte High School, a 1974 graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with a Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration and a 1977 graduate of St. Mary's School of Law, San Antonio, Texas. Pete has a 40 year history of community involvement and service as an elected and appointed official and as a practicing attorney in Albuquerque. Pete and his wife Betty Case Dinelli have been married since 1984 and they have two adult sons, Mark, who is an attorney and George, who is an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT). Pete has been a licensed New Mexico attorney since 1978. Pete has over 27 years of municipal and state government service. Pete’s service to Albuquerque has been extensive. He has been an elected Albuquerque City Councilor, serving as Vice President. He has served as a Worker’s Compensation Judge with Statewide jurisdiction. Pete has been a prosecutor for 15 years and has served as a Bernalillo County Chief Deputy District Attorney, as an Assistant Attorney General and Assistant District Attorney and as a Deputy City Attorney. For eight years, Pete was employed with the City of Albuquerque both as a Deputy City Attorney and Chief Public Safety Officer overseeing the city departments of police, fire, 911 emergency call center and the emergency operations center. While with the City of Albuquerque Legal Department, Pete served as Director of the Safe City Strike Force and Interim Director of the 911 Emergency Operations Center. Pete’s community involvement includes being a past President of the Albuquerque Kiwanis Club, past President of the Our Lady of Fatima School Board, and Board of Directors of the Albuquerque Museum Foundation.

Deb Haaland Endorses Stephanie Garcia Richard As Her Running Mate For Lt. Governor; Democratic Party State Central Committee To Met July 25; COMMENTARY: Remaining Candidates Should Withdraw From Race For Sake Of Democratic Party Unity

NM Democratic Party nominee for Governor Deb Haaland Deb has notified the New Mexico Democratic Party State Central Committee (SCC) that she has picked State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard as her running mate in her campaign for New Mexico Governor. The endorsement of Garcia Richard came one day after Haaland released a list of five potential running mates to join her on the November 4 general election ballot. Haaland interviewed all five of the candidates after a preliminary vetting process.

On  Wednesday June 24, Deb Haaland emailed all Democratic State Central Committee Members notifying them that her campaign had received thirteen applicants requesting that they be considered for Lt. Governor and the 13  requested the candidate questionnaire. Nine questionnaires were completed and submitted. Haaland notified the State Central Committee that she planned to  meet and interview the following 5:

  • Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard
  • State Senator Leo Jaramillo
  • State Senator Harold Pope
  • Antonia Roybal-Mack, J.D.
  • Sonya Smith, Ret. US Air Force

HAALAND ENDORSES STATE LAND COMMISSIONER STEPHANIE GARCIA RICHARD

On Friday, June 25, Deb Haaland sent the Democratic Party State Central Committee the following email notifying them that she endorsed Stephanie Garcia Richard For Lt. Governor. Following is the email:

“Dear Distinguished Democratic State Central Committee Member: 

I thank each person who put their name forward and who participated in this endorsement process of the Democratic nominee for Lieutenant Governor. Each candidate I spoke with has a deep love and commitment to moving New Mexico forward. This was a difficult decision to make and I’m grateful for your patience and respect. 

I am proud to endorse Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard. I’ve made the decision based on a thorough process and who I believe will be the best running mate and leader to lower costs, increase access to healthcare, build safe communities, and improve our schools. Stephanie brings the energy, compassion, leadership, and proven ability to bring people together that I believe will strengthen our campaign and our ability to deliver for New Mexicans. I respect the role the SCC plays in this selection and I hope I can count on the support of Committee members for Stephanie.

The stakes of this race couldn’t be higher because of who is in the White House. New Mexico needs leadership that can deliver, but we can’t deliver on our promises unless we win in November. 

Stephanie has won two statewide elections, even when the odds were stacked against her. She is a proven leader – in the classroom as a teacher, as a member of the New Mexico House helping carve the path for universal childcare, and now as the Land Commissioner she has delivered real results for working families. While I was advancing our clean energy economy across the country, Stephanie was leading the same fight here at home. She has grown critical state funding for education, overseen job creation in our energy economy, and implemented policies that protect our air, land, and water. 

Her roots stretch across New Mexico, from growing up in Southern New Mexico to raising her family in Northern New Mexico, giving her a deep understanding of the people, communities, and diversity that define our state. Like me, she’ll always stand with our rural communities, from Silver City to Jal to Las Vegas and everywhere in between, because she knows that our people make New Mexico strong.

New Mexicans deserve a government that works just as hard as they do. They deserve leaders who will stop at nothing to fight for lower costs, provide a quality public education, expand access to healthcare, and make our communities safer.

Stephanie is that leader and is the best prepared to serve. In our conversations, what impressed me most was her vision for this role. She sees the Lieutenant Governor’s office as an opportunity to build partnerships, solve problems, and help deliver on the promises we’ve made to New Mexicans. I know she’ll be an engaged, collaborative partner from day one, and that’s why I am endorsing her as my running mate.

Onward,

Deb Haaland”

Links to quoted or relied upon news sources are here:

https://www.koat.com/article/deb-haaland-endorses-stephanie-garcia-richard-for-lieutenant-governor/71748657

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/deb-haaland-endorses-stephanie-garcia-richard-for-new-mexico-lieutenant-governor/

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/deb-haaland-endorses-stephanie-garcia-richard-as-running-mate-but-selection-not-a-done-deal-yet/3070697

BIOGRAPHY OF STEPHANIE GARCIA RICHARD

State Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard ran for the Democratic nomination for lieutenant governor last year, but she suspended her campaign when her husband was diagnosed with cancer. Garcia Richard now says that her husband is in remission and that she is  ready to continue with her campaign. Haaland and Garcia Richard have a  history of working together and friendship. It was Garcia Richard who nominated Deb Haaland for Governor before Democratic Party nominating convention.

Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard is the first woman, the first Latina, and the first educator to serve in the position as New Mexico’s Commissioner of Public Lands.  Born in Tucumcari and raised in Silver City, Garcia Richard learned at a young age the importance of serving others. Her father, a WWII veteran, was a teacher; her mother was active in their church and community.

Garcia Richard grew up in a family that operated ranches on the eastern plans and northern mountains of New Mexico, sparking the strong connection to our land that she holds today. After graduating from Silver High School, Garcia Richard went on to receive her undergraduate degree from Barnard College at Columbia University in New York.

Stephanie Garcia Richard was elected to the New Mexico House of Representatives in 2012. During her six years as a State Representative, she championed laws to increase access to a quality education, transparency, and investments in renewable energy, job training, and economic development. She served as Chair of the House Education Committee for two years before being elected Land Commissioner in 2018.

As Land Commissioner, Garcia Richard has been focused on raising as much money as possible for the state in administering public lands while always keeping an eye toward stewardship and preserving the land for generations to come. She believes that the state can diversify the revenue that comes into the Land Office by tripling the number of renewable energy projects, promoting outdoor recreation, and encouraging new and innovative commercial development on state trust land.

With the largest continuous oil and gas resources potential ever assessed in the world sitting in Southeast New Mexico, and land that is prime for wind and solar development, Commissioner Garcia Richard has been  committed to working to make more money for New Mexico while protecting the health of our land.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Under New Mexico’s election code, candidates for governor and lieutenant governor run independently in the primary election. The winners of those races who share the same party affiliation are then paired on a ticket for the general election. When a candidate is elected in a Democratic Party primary election, and then drops out, it is the Democratic Party State Central Committee that has the exclusive authority to nominate and select candidates to fill the vacancy. This  is  the case with Maggie Toulouse Oliver announcing she would suspend her campaign and withdraw  as the Democratic Party nominee for Lt. Governor.

The fact that Deb Haaland has endorsed Stephanie Garcia Richard to be her Lt. Governor running mate to replace Maggie Toulouse Oliver does not make it a done deal. Far from it. The New Mexico Democratic Party State Central Committee (SCC)  is scheduled to meet  on Saturday, July 25th,  to officially vote to fill the Lt. Governor vacancy. The meeting will be held remotely by zoom conference call. Theoretically, other candidates can be nominated at the meeting and run.

It is understood that that this is the very first time for a New Mexico gubernatorial nominee to get actively involved with selection of a new running mate after a candidate has dropped out. More than a few “political purists” within the Democratic Party severely criticized Deb Haaland arguing  she  overstepped  her authority as the Democratic Party nominee for Governor by getting involved with the vetting process and interviewing candidates for Lt. Governor and then endorsing a candidate.

The New Mexico Republican Party is extremely critical of the process used for replacing Toulouse Oliver on this fall’s ballot. The New Mexico Republican Party likened it to the process the Democratic National Committee Party (DNC) used in 2024 to have Vice President Kamala Harris run for president as its nominee replacing President Joe Biden. The simple truth is the process used for filling the vacancy is in compliance with New Mexico law. It is a process that has been used to fill ballot vacancies in past election cycles, including within the Republican Party. Political self-righteous efforts to exclude Haaland from the vetting process and excluding her in expressing her view and endorsing someone is pure political garbage, especially when  expressed by the New Mexico Republican Party as being anti-democratic.

Deb Haaland won the Democratic nomination for Governor in the largest landslide in State Democratic Party history securing 72.3% of the vote (156,861 votes) to Sam Bregman’s 27.7% of the vote (60,189). Deb Haaland won every single county in the state by varying percentages. In Santa Fe County she won with 80% of the Democratic vote. In Bernalillo County Haaland won with 69%. In Dona Ana County, she won with 79%. In conservative Chavez County, thought to lean moderate Bregman, she won with 73%. The 2026 New Mexico primary for Governor was the most expensive primary in the state’s history. According to finance reports filed with the Secretary of State, Democrat Deb Haaland raised over $12 Million while Sam Bregman raised upwards of $4 Million.

Simply put, Deb Haaland in reality is now head of the Democratic Party by virtue of her landslide victory and her fundraising prowess. It is  her political career and agenda that is ultimately at stake and that is on the ballot. It was for these reasons that it was totally appropriate for her to endorse a preferred candidate. The political purist argued  that Haaland should have left  the vetting for a new Lt. Governor exclusively to the NM Democratic Party State Central Committee and that would have been a major mistake ultimately contributing to a divided party.

The Democratic Party State Central Committee (SCC) will make the ultimate decision as to who will be the party’s Lt. Governor nominee and for that reason there was  risk to Deb Haaland getting involved and endorsing Stephanie Garcia Richard. Ostensibly, Stephanie Garcia Richard is a person that Deb Haaland feels she can  trust and  someone who will not undercut her agenda but rather someone who will campaign and promote her and the Democratic party agenda. More importantly, Stephanie Garcia Richard is qualified and can assume the office of Governor should Haaland for some reason leave office before her term ends.

The other candidates who did not get the Haaland endorsement should seriously consider setting aside their disappointment, and perhaps their differences with Deb Haaland, and drop out of the race and throw their support to Stephanie Garcia Richard for Lt. Governor. This will allow Deb Haaland to go forth with a unified party and with a candidate for Lt. Governor that she feels she can work with now and after they are elected.

Links to related Dinelli News and Commentary articles are here:

Democratic Party Nominee For Governor Deb Haaland Will Take Active Role In “Vetting” Lieutenant Governor Candidates; Haaland Will Endorse After She Interviews; State Democratic State Central Committee Announces Process To Apply; Candidates Begin To Emerge To Replace Toulouse Oliver

 

State Democratic Party Chair Sara Attleson Sends Out Official Call To Democratic Party State Central Committee To Fill Lieutenant Governor Vacancy; Haaland Identifies Five Lt. Governor Applicants She Will Interview; COMMENTARY: Appropriate For Haaland To Vet Applicants

 

 

State Democratic Party Chair Sara Attleson Sends Out Official Call To Democratic Party State Central Committee To Fill Lieutenant Governor Vacancy; Haaland Identifies Five Lt. Governor Applicants She Will Interview; COMMENTARY: Appropriate For Haaland To Vet Applicants

On June 23, less than a week after Democratic Party Lieutenant Governor nominee Maggie Toulouse Oliver announced she would suspend her campaign due to health issues, it was widely reported by news agencies that Democratic Party nominee for Governor Deb Haaland told all members of the New Mexico Democratic Party State Central Committee (SCC) that she would be  interviewing  potential replacements for Lt. Governor. Haaland also said she planned to send candidates for the post a questionnaire and issue an endorsement before party insiders make a final selection.

Links to quoted or relied upon news sources are here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/maggie-toulouse-oliver-to-suspend-campaign-for-lieutenant-governor-citing-health-issues/3065914

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/elections/toulouse-oliver-suspends-campaign-as-haalands-running-mate-pope-jaramillo-in-the-running/article_f5856294-3a91-468b-9134-6a7ad934ecf9.html

https://sourcenm.com/briefs/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-maggie-toulouse-oliver-suspends-dem-lt-gov-campaign-citing-health/

HAALAND SAYS WILL INTERVIEW CANDIDATES

On Monday, June 22, 2026 Democratic Party nominee for Governor Deb Haaland sent the following email to all members for the Democratic Party State Central Committee. The subject was entitled “A personal note from Deb Haaland regarding an endorsement process”:

“Dear Distinguished Democratic State Central Committee Member: 

First, thank you to Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver for her exceptional, longstanding and ongoing work for New Mexico. I also value her friendship, and her courage. 

I have received a number of inquiries in the past few days on my perspective to help ensure that a hardworking and unifying lieutenant governor candidate fills Secretary Toulouse Oliver’s shoes. I am writing to you today to share my intention to meet with these candidates as the State Central Committee begins to consider their options to fill this significant vacancy on the ballot. 

As a former State Party Chair, I respect each of you and the important role you will play in helping choose the best person for the job. In my role as the Democratic nominee for Governor and with a deep concern for the direction of New Mexico, I also carry a responsibility to ensure we have the best candidate, who will help accomplish our shared vision to lower costs for families, increase access to healthcare, improve education, and make communities safer.

Out of respect for your duty to our party and state, and with the firm belief that this process should be open and transparent, I wish to share how I plan to consider the candidate who I plan to support in this race. I approach this process with a focus on what we stand to gain as a state when we are successful at winning the November election.

  • For any candidate who wishes to participate, we will send a questionnaire that will be available to all lieutenant governor candidates. Candidates can request this questionnaire by sending an email to info@debhaaland.com.
  • Second, my team and I will hold interviews ahead of the SCC election with the goal of understanding their ideas about how they will share in the campaign work ahead as well as their vision for our state. 
  • When all of the interviews are complete, I plan to announce an endorsement. 

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration in this process of nominee selection, and I look forward to working alongside you as we seek the best candidate to stand up for New Mexico’s working families.

In service,

Deb Haaland”

 

HAALAND REVEALS APPLICANTS

On Wednesday June 24, Deb Haaland emailed all Democratic State Central Committee Members the following:

“Dear Distinguished Democratic State Central Committee Member: 

On Monday, I shared that as the State Central Committee considers their options to fill the vacancy on the ballot for Lieutenant Governor, my campaign and I will conduct a thorough endorsement process. 

We received thirteen requests for our questionnaire and nine questionnaires were completed and submitted. I am deeply appreciative of the hard work and commitment to public service every person demonstrated.

In the interest of transparency, I am sharing the five who I plan to meet with in the coming days:

  • Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard
  • State Senator Leo Jaramillo
  • State Senator Harold Pope
  • Antonia Roybal-Mack, J.D.
  • Sonya Smith, Ret. US Air Force

Again, I am looking to support the most qualified New Mexican who will be equipped to move forward our shared vision for a better New Mexico. In these interviews, I plan to assess candidates on a number of qualities including leadership style, collaboration, vision, accomplishments, and background.  

Thank you again for your consideration. I look forward to working alongside you as we seek the best candidate to stand up for New Mexico’s working families.

In service,

Deb Haaland”

 

STATE DEMOCRATIC PARTY CHAIR SENDS OUT CALL TO STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE TO  FILL LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR VACANCY

On June 25, Sara Attleson, Chair of the Democratic Party of New Mexico sent out the official call to fill the Lieutenant Governor vacancy caused Maggie Toulouse Oliver. Following is the call sent to all State Central Committee members:

Dear SCC Member,  

On today, June 25, 2026, we received notice from the Secretary of State’s office that the Democratic Party nominee for Lieutenant Governor is withdrawing from the race.

According to 2025 New Mexico Statute 1-8-8, if after a primary election, but ninety or more days before the general election, a vacancy occurs, for any cause, in the list of the nominees of a qualified political party for any public office to be filled in the general election, the central committee of the state political party of the nominee fills the vacancy. State Statute states that committee members must reside within the boundaries of the area to be represented by the public office.

Per DPNM Rules Article I, Section 4.3, I am writing to provide you with the official CALL to the Democratic Party of New Mexico (DPNM) State Central Committee (SCC) Meeting to fill the position of Lieutenant Governor on the general election ballot.

The Spring 2026 SCC Meeting will be held as a virtual meeting on Saturday July 25th, 2026. The meeting will be called to order at 12:00PM.

All SCC voting conducted pursuant to this SCC Meeting will be conducted via Absentee Voting by non-secret ballots per DPNM Rules, Article I, Rule 5.5.

All 2025–2027 SCC members are invited to participate in the SCC Meeting on July 25th, 2026. We look forward to seeing you.

We will issue further information on the process as soon as possible.

Sincerely,  

Sara Attleson

Chair, Democratic Party of New Mexico

   

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

It is interesting  that the July 25th, 2026 meeting of the Democratic Party State Central Committee to select a new nominee for Lt. Governor will not be an in-person meeting but  be held remotely by zoom conference call. Such an effort will reduce to a great extend the political drama of the event on the day the selection is made  by the party as the candidates will likely engaged in extensive lobbying efforts over the next few weeks and as Haaland goes through her vetting process.

It is believed that that this is the first time for a New Mexico gubernatorial nominee to get actively involved with selection of a new running mate after a candidate has dropped out. More than a few political purists within the Democratic Party  are arguing that Haaland is overstepping her authority as the Democratic Party Nominee for Governor by getting involved with the vetting process for a new Lt. Governor nominee. Some are arguing that Senator Harold Pope should fill the vacancy because he ran and that there is a need for a balance ticket to include a male.

Political self-righteous efforts  to exclude Haaland from the vetting process and excluding her in expressing her view and endorsing someone is pure political garbage, especially as  it is being  expressed as being anti-democratic and by the New Mexico Republican Party.  Deb Haaland won the Democratic nomination for Governor in the largest landslide in State Democratic Party history securing 72.3% of the vote (156,861 votes) to Sam Bregman’s 27.7% of the vote (60,189). Deb Haaland won every single county in the state by varying percentages. In Santa Fe County she won with 80% of the Democratic vote. In Bernalillo County Haaland won with 69%. In Dona Ana County, she won with 79%. In conservative Chavez County, thought to lean moderate Bregman, she won with 73%. The 2026 New Mexico primary for Governor was the most expensive primary in the state’s history. According to finance reports filed with the Secretary of State, Democrat Deb Haaland raised over $12 Million while Sam Bregman raised upwards of $4 Million.

The political purist argue that Haaland should leave the vetting for a new Lt. Governor exclusively to  the State Central Committee. That would be a mistake. Simply put, Deb Haaland is head of the Democratic Party by virtue of her landslide victory and her fundraising. She needs to call the shots for the Democratic Party because it will be her political career that is ultimately at stake and on the ballot.  Leaving the vetting for a new Lt. Governor candidate exclusively to the State Central Committee would be a major mistake and Haaland  needs to make her thoughts known as who she wants to replace Toulouse Oliver.

Haaland heads the Democratic Party ticket for state government elective offices and she needs to help with the selection of  a new  Lt. Governor candidate she believes she will be able to work with once they are elected as a ticket. Haaland must make sure that the Lt. Governor  vacancy is filled by someone she can fully trust and  someone who will not undercut her agenda but rather someone who will campaign and promote her and the Democratic party  agenda.  More importantly, the person selected must be fully qualified and who can assume the office of Governor should she leave office before her term ends. She is showing real leadership in getting involved with the vetting process.

There is some risk to Haaland getting involved and endorsing a candidate in that  the state central committee may not agree with her and go with another candidate, but there is too much at stake at this point in time. The bottom line is, it will be the State Central Committee that will make the ultimate decision as to who will be the party’s Lt. Governor nominee, but the State Central Committee  should respect the recommendation made by its nominee for Governor Deb Haaland to allow her to go forth with a unified party and with a candidate for Lt. Governor that she can work with now and after they are elected.

The link to a related article is here:

Democratic Party Nominee For Governor Deb Haaland Will Take Active Role In “Vetting” Lieutenant Governor Candidates; Haaland Will Endorse After She Interviews; State Democratic State Central Committee Announces Process To Apply; Candidates Begin To Emerge To Replace Toulouse Oliver

Democratic Party Nominee For Governor Deb Haaland Will Take Active Role In “Vetting” Lieutenant Governor Candidates; Haaland Will Endorse After She Interviews; State Democratic State Central Committee Announces Process To Apply; Candidates Begin To Emerge To Replace Toulouse Oliver

On June 2, two term Democrat Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver won the Democratic Party nomination to be New Mexico’s next Lieutenant Governor in a landslide primary election victory over her opponent State Senator Harold Pope (D-Albuquerque). Toulouse Oliver secured 80% (168,109) of the vote to Pope’s 20% (42,127).

On June 18, Maggie Toulouse Oliver  announced she was suspending her campaign thereby dropping out of the race.  Toulouse Oliver wrote  in part in her Facebook announcement:

“This has been an incredibly difficult decision, but a necessary one. Recent changes to my health have caused my family and I to reflect on my commitments at home and to the people of our state — both of which I take extraordinarily seriously. Suspending my campaign will allow me to focus on my family while ensuring I can continue to fulfill my duties as secretary of state.”

Toulouse Oliver concluded her statement thanking all  the New Mexicans who cast ballots in the June 2 primary election for her.

Former U.S. Interior Secretary Deb Haaland, who secured the Democratic nomination in the governor’s race also in a landslide victory over Sam Bregman, would have shared the ticket with Toulouse Oliver. Haaland issued a statement and wished Toulouse Oliver well and wrote this:

“It is a courageous decision to run for office and it’s a decision all New Mexicans understand when you must step back to prioritize your family and health. Thank you to Maggie for your exceptional, longstanding work for New Mexico, your friendship and your courage.”

In a statement, State Senator Harold Pope, who ran against Toulouse Oliver in the June primary said  he is thinking of her and her family and wished them well. Pope also made it known he intends to seek the nomination from the Democratic Party State Central Committee when it meets to fill the vacancy and he said this:

“I want to fill that position if she, indeed, is going to suspend her campaign. … The results didn’t happen the way I wanted them to in the primary…but with my experience in the Senate and what I stand for, I think I would be a great addition to the ticket.”

In a statement, Democratic Party of New Mexico Communications Director Daniel Garcia said the party’s State Central Committee will select a replacement. Garcia said this:

“The timeline for that process is being finalized … “New Mexicans should know that this is a secure, well-established process that has been used successfully for many years, including to fill the CD-1 vacancy in 2021 and nominees for HD-53 and SD-28 in 2024.

Links to quoted or relied upon news sources are hereL

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/maggie-toulouse-oliver-to-suspend-campaign-for-lieutenant-governor-citing-health-issues/3065914

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/elections/toulouse-oliver-suspends-campaign-as-haalands-running-mate-pope-jaramillo-in-the-running/article_f5856294-3a91-468b-9134-6a7ad934ecf9.html

https://sourcenm.com/briefs/new-mexico-secretary-of-state-maggie-toulouse-oliver-suspends-dem-lt-gov-campaign-citing-health/

BERRNALILLO COUMTY DEMOCRATIC PARTY ANNOUNCES MEETING

On June 23, the Bernalillo County Democratic Party announced that it  would be hosting its June General Meeting,  Saturday, June 27, from 2:30 to 4:00 p.m. at Botts Hall in the Special Collections Library (423 Central Ave NE). Doors open at 2:00. This is an external monthly meeting focused on electoral work, and it’s open to the general public not just party members. DPNM Co Executive Director Isaiah Baca will attend the meeting to discuss how the selection process for Lt. Governor will work, how it’s worked in the past, and what the timeline will be.

DEMOCRATIC PARTY ANNOUNCES PROCESS TO FILL LT. GOVERNOR NOMINEE VACACNCY

On June 22, Co-Executive Directors Isaiah Baca and Clayton Cate for the New Mexico State Democratic Party sent out an email to all State Central Committee Members outlining the process that will be used to fill the Lt.Governor vacancy. Following is the full email sent:

Last week, we were notified that there will be a vacancy on the ballot for Lieutenant Governor. We want to thank you for your patience as we determined what the process will look like for filling the vacancy. 

 We are sending this out to members of the State Central Committee and will have this posted on our website to ensure transparency and fairness. We are dedicated to holding fair and democratic elections. 

QUALIFICATIONS FOR LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR POSITIONS

According to the Constitution of New Mexico, Article V, Section 3, a candidate must be a U.S. citizen, at least 30 years old, and must have resided continuously in New Mexico for five years immediately preceding the election.

In order to be the party’s nominee for the positions, the nominee to fill the vacancy must be a qualified New Mexico voter and must also be a registered Democrat.

STATE STATUTE ON FILLING A VACANCY

The process that governs filling a vacancy on the ballot is governed by the 2025 New Mexico Statutes, Chapter 1 – Elections, Article 8 – Nominations and Primary Elections

Section 1-8-8 – Vacancy on general election ballot. 

Here are the applicable components of the statute:

  • If after a primary election, but ninety or more days before the general election, a vacancy occurs, for any cause, in the list of the nominees of a qualified political party for any public office to be filled in the general election [shall be compiled],
  • The central committee of the state political party filing the name of its nominee for the office with the proper filing officer when the office is a federal office, state office, district office or multicounty legislative district office; and
  • The county or state central committee members making the appointment pursuant to Subsection A of this section shall be as provided for in the rules of the respective party; provided that, at a minimum, the committee shall include those members residing within the boundaries of the area to be represented by the public office.

DPNM RULES ON FILLING A VACANCY

Step 1. The Chair issues a call to an SCC meeting to fill the vacancy

The State Chair issues a CALL for the SCC meeting and election. Under DPNM Rules, Article I, Rule 4.3, only the State Chair can call a meeting of the SCC to fill the ballot vacancy. This process starts with the Chair’s CALL.

Step 2. The CALL goes out, minimum 30 days before the SCC meeting/election.

 Per Article II, Rule 1.3, the CALL must be sent to every SCC member at least 30 days before the meeting, by mail or email (whichever method they chose). The CALL must state the date, time, and location of the meeting (plus login info if the meeting is virtual), and that the purpose of the SCC election is to fill the vacancy in the Dem. Lt. Governor position on the General Election ballot. 

 Step 3. The qualified electors 

 Article I, Rule 4.1 states that the nominee is chosen by the SCC members “from the geographical area corresponding to the jurisdiction of the office.” Lt. Gov. is a statewide office, so the jurisdiction is the whole state and the entire SCC is eligible to vote.

 Step 4. Establishing quorum

 In accordance with Article II, Rule 1.3, SCC meetings/elections must meet two quorum requirements:

      • Committee quorum: 25% of SCC members 
      • County quorum: A majority of the counties must be represented (at least one member voting from 17 of the 33 counties)

With absentee voting, quorum is met when the specified minimum of SCC members vote (at least 25% of members vote, with at least 17 county parties represented).

 Step 5. Voting by non-secret ballot

 One candidate will be elected as the DPNM nominee for the General election ballot. 

Voting Procedures:

  • If only one candidate runs, the SCC members vote for that candidate, or a write-in, or abstain. 
  • If two candidates run, the SCC members vote for one of the two candidates; the candidate who receives a majority of votes is declared the winner 
  • If three or more candidates run, the SCC members vote on a ranked-choice ballot for their preferred candidates. See Article I, Rule 5.4.4.2 for the number of choices available. 
  • On a ranked-choice ballot, if one candidate receives a majority of first-choice votes, they are declared the winner. 
  • If no candidate receives a majority of first-choice votes, the ranked score (Borda Count) is calculated for each candidate (see Article I, Rule 5.4.4). The candidate who receives the highest ranked score is declared the winner. 
  • Ties are broken by lot. See Article I, Rule 5.3.6.

 Because SCC members are voting on behalf of their constituents, this is a non-secret ballot and cannot be made a secret ballot (Article I, Rule 5.2.2).

 Voting will be done absentee via election buddy. Since the vote is going to be done absentee, we will not have proxy voting.

Per DPNM’s policy for internal elections, the voting period will be open for four days to ensure all eligible voters are able to cast their ballot.

Step 6: State Chair files the nominee with the Secretary of State

After the results are announced, the DPNM Chair files the elected nominee’s name with the Secretary of State, on the SOS form, along with the new nominee’s sworn declaration of candidacy and Campaign Reporting Act paperwork.

 FILING TO BE A CANDIDATE

Candidates interested in filling the vacancy on the ballot must register their interest with the party. Click here to fill out the DPNM form. Per party rules, DPNM must send out a list of the candidates 20 days prior to voting. Write-in candidates will be accepted. 

OBTAINING THE STATE CENTRAL COMMITTEE LIST

 Candidates who are interested in obtaining the SCC list for the purpose of campaigning must fill out the list privacy agreement. Click here to view. Submit the signed agreement to Isaiah@nmdemocrats.org

MEETING DATE

DPNM cannot send the call until we have received official notice of the ballot vacancy. We are expecting that announcement to come this week and are currently planning on holding the meeting 30 days after that notice. The expected date of the meeting is July 25, 2026. The meeting will be held virtually. 

FORUMS 

According to the DPNM Candidate Forum Policy for Internal Party Elections, the state party must hold a forum within a time window between 14 to 7 days prior to the election. 

Per the policy, equal time will be given to candidates. Questions may be submitted prior to the forum. We will set up a form before the forum to collect questions. 

TIMELINE 

All of this is subject to change based on when we receive information from the Secretary of State. We will update the SCC if any changes occur. 

  • June 25, 2026: Call to the SCC to hold an election to fill the vacancy goes out
  • July 5, 2026: List of declared candidates sent to the SCC
  • July 18, 2026: Candidate forum will be held on Saturday, July 18, 2026
  • July 25, 2026: SCC meeting will be held on Saturday, July 25, 2026. The meeting will be brief. We will explain the voting procedures. Voting will open after the meeting concludes.
  • July 28, 2026: voting closes at 5:00 p.m. on July 28, 2026 per the Policy for Internal elections
  • July 29, 2026: voting results will be released. A letter with the nominee to fill the vacancy will be sent to the Secretary of State. 

Isaiah Baca and Clayton Cate

Co-Executive Directors

DEB HAALAND ANNOUNCES SHE WILL INTERVIEW INTERESTED LT. GOVERNOR  CANDIDATES AND MAKE ENDORSEMENT

Democratic gubernatorial nominee Deb Haaland  made it known she intends to get involved in the vetting of a new running mate. Less than a week after lieutenant governor nominee Maggie Toulouse Oliver announced she would suspend her campaign due to health issues, Haaland told all members of the New Mexico Democratic Party State Central Committee (SCC)she will interview potential replacements for Lt. Governor for the November general election. Haaland also said she plans to send candidates for the post a questionnaire and issue an endorsement before party insiders make a final selection.

On Monday, June 22, 2026 Democratic Party nominee for Governor Deb Haaland sent the following email to all members for the Democratic Party State Central Committee. The Subject was entitled “A personal note from Deb Haaland regarding an endorsement process”:

“Dear Distinguished Democratic State Central Committee Member: 

First, thank you to Secretary of State Maggie Toulouse Oliver for her exceptional, longstanding and ongoing work for New Mexico. I also value her friendship, and her courage. 

I have received a number of inquiries in the past few days on my perspective to help ensure that a hardworking and unifying lieutenant governor candidate fills Secretary Toulouse Oliver’s shoes. I am writing to you today to share my intention to meet with these candidates as the State Central Committee begins to consider their options to fill this significant vacancy on the ballot. 

As a former State Party Chair, I respect each of you and the important role you will play in helping choose the best person for the job. In my role as the Democratic nominee for Governor and with a deep concern for the direction of New Mexico, I also carry a responsibility to ensure we have the best candidate, who will help accomplish our shared vision to lower costs for families, increase access to healthcare, improve education, and make communities safer.

Out of respect for your duty to our party and state, and with the firm belief that this process should be open and transparent, I wish to share how I plan to consider the candidate who I plan to support in this race. I approach this process with a focus on what we stand to gain as a state when we are successful at winning the November election.

  • For any candidate who wishes to participate, we will send a questionnaire that will be available to all lieutenant governor candidates. Candidates can request this questionnaire by sending an email to info@debhaaland.com.
  • Second, my team and I will hold interviews ahead of the SCC election with the goal of understanding their ideas about how they will share in the campaign work ahead as well as their vision for our state. 
  • When all of the interviews are complete, I plan to announce an endorsement. 

Thank you for your thoughtful consideration in this process of nominee selection, and I look forward to working alongside you as we seek the best candidate to stand up for New Mexico’s working families.

In service,

Deb Haaland

CANDIDATES EXPRESSING  INTEREST

Several Democrats have expressed interest in filling the Lieutenant Governor vacancy since Toulouse Oliver’s abrupt withdrawal from the race. The list of potential candidates includes state Senator Harold Pope Jr. of Albuquerque, State Senator Leo Jaramillo of Española and outgoing state Land Commissioner Stephanie Garcia Richard.

Garcia Richard had previously planned to run for lieutenant governor but suspended her campaign last October due to her husband’s cancer battle. After Toulouse Oliver announced she planned to bow out of the race, Garcia Richard said her husband’s health has improved in recent months and indicated she would be “ready to serve” if called upon.

On June 23,  another potential candidate, state Auditor Joseph Maestas, announced he was removing his name from consideration due to logistical challenges that would be created if he were to step down as State Auditor.

Four other names that have been mentioned as possible candidates include:

  • Former State Auditor Brian Colón
  • Los Ranchos de Albuquerque Mayor Lawrence Rael
  • Former House Speaker Brian Egolf (D-Santa Fe)
  • Former Senate Majority Leader Michael Sanchez (D-Belen)

Haaland campaign spokeswoman Hannah Menchhoff  did not answer directly when asked by the Albuquerque Journal whether Haaland would consider candidates’ ethnicity and gender in her endorsement process. Menchhoff said this:

“Deb is looking to support the most qualified candidate who will be equipped to help lower costs, increase access to health care, strengthen education, and keep communities safe. …Lieutenant governor candidates will have access to the questionnaire, which focuses on leadership style, collaboration, vision, accomplishments, and background.” 

State Democratic Party spokesman Daniel Garcia did not say committee members would automatically select whoever Haaland endorses but acknowledged her wishes could carry political weight. Garcia said this to the Albuquerque Journal in an interview:

“State Central Committee members may be interested to know who Deb thinks could most effectively help run the state and be the best complement to our party’s statewide ticket as they evaluate the candidates and make their individual decisions on how they rank the candidates. ”

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/deb-haaland-plans-to-vet-potential-running-mates-as-democrats-ready-to-fill-ballot-vacancy/3068555

https://www.krqe.com/news/politics-government/multiple-democrats-declare-interest-in-becoming-nominee-for-new-mexico-lt-governor/

https://www.santafenewmexican.com/news/elections/toulouse-oliver-suspends-campaign-as-haalands-running-mate-pope-jaramillo-in-the-running/article_f5856294-3a91-468b-9134-6a7ad934ecf9.html

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The Democratic ticket was set to be all-female ticket with Haaland and Toulouse Oliver, a historical  first for a major political party in New Mexico before Toulouse Oliver announced her withdrawal from the race. Under New Mexico primary election law, governor and lieutenant governor candidates run independently in the primary and the winners of these races who share the same party affiliation are then paired on a ticket for the general election. New Mexico history is replete with New Mexico Governors and Lt. Governors, who ran independently in the primary who are then elected as a ticket, but who simply do not get along, or who did  not like each other and where relations were strained.

It is believed that that this is the first time for a New Mexico gubernatorial nominee to get actively involved with selection of a new running mate after a candidate has dropped out. More than a few political purists within the Democratic Party  are arguing that Haaland is overstepping her authority as the Democratic Party Nominee for Governor by getting involved with the vetting process for a new Lt. Governor nominee. Some are arguing that Senator Harold Pope should fill the vacancy because he ran and that there is a need for a balance ticket to include a male.  The political purist argue that Haaland should leave the vetting for a new Lt. Governor exclusively to  the State Central Committee which would be a mistake.

Deb Haaland won the Democratic nomination for Governor in the largest landslide in State Democratic Party history securing 72.3% of the vote (156,861 votes) to Sam Bregman’s 27.7% of the vote (60,189). Deb Haaland won every single county in the state by varying percentages. In Santa Fe County she won with 80% of the Democratic vote. In Bernalillo County Haaland won with 69%. In Dona Ana County, she won with 79%. In conservative Chavez County, thought to lean moderate Bregman, she won with 73%. The 2026 New Mexico primary for Governor was the most expensive primary in the state’s history. According to finance reports filed with the Secretary of State, Democrat Deb Haaland raised over $12 Million while Sam Bregman raised upwards of $4 Million.

Simply put, Deb Haaland is head of the Democratic Party by virtue of her landslide victory and her fundraising. She needs to call the shots for the Democratic Party because it will be her political career that is ultimately at stake and on the ballot.  Leaving the vetting for a new Lt. Governor candidate exclusively to the State Central Committee would be a major mistake on Haaland’s part and she needs to make her thoughts known as who she wants to replace Toulouse Oliver.

Haaland heads the Democratic Party  ticket  for state government elective offices and she needs to help with the selection of  a new  Lt. Governor candidate she believes she will be able to work with once they are elected as a ticket. Haaland must make sure that the Lt. Governor  vacancy is filled by someone she can fully trust and  someone who will not undercut her agenda but rather someone who will campaign and promote her agenda.  More importantly,  the person selected must be fully qualified and who can assume the office of Governor should she leave office before her term ends. She is showing real leadership in getting involved with the vetting process.

There is some risk to Haaland getting involved and endorsing a candidate in that  the state central committee may not agree with her and go with another candidate, but there is too much at stake at this point in time. The bottom line is, it will be the State Central Committee that will make the ultimate decision as to who will be the party’s Lt. Governor nominee, but the State Central Committee  should respect the recommendation made by its nominee for Governor Deb Haaland to allow her to go forth with a unified party and with a candidate for Lt. Governor that she can work with now and after they are elected.

 

NM Supreme Court Uphold’s Gov. MLG’s Policy Of Protecting Drug-Exposed Newborns; Lawsuit Reflection Of “Damned If You Do, Damn If You Don’t” Litigation Against State; Recalling NM Department of Justice Report Of New Mexico Children Youth and Family’s Department; Abolish CYFD And Create New, Independent Agency With A Legislative Appointed Commission  

On June 8, the New Mexico  Supreme Court unanimously rejected an American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) emergency petition to immediately halt Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s Executive Order  placing drug-exposed newborns in state protective custody.  The New Mexico  Supreme Court refused  to halt the Governor’s  specific policy designed to prevent drug-exposed newborns in New Mexico from being discharged to unsafe home environments.

Without comment, the New Mexico Supreme Court Justices unanimously denied a petition from the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico and State  Rep. Micaela Cadena, D-Mesilla, and State Sen. Linda Lopez, D-Albuquerque seeking an emergency order on the grounds that the practice is unlawful and causing irreparable harm to family’s and their newborn children.   The petition sought to prohibit the state Children, Youth and Families Department from taking custody of such infants at hospitals and immediately filing abuse and neglect petitions against their parents in court.

More than 130 infants have entered foster care or other suitable placements since Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham instituted the directive on July 7, 2025. Governor Lujan Grisham  said this in a statement:

“The drugs devastating our families today demand a different response from state government. …  My Executive Order is part of that response  and it has already saved lives. The order is designed as a temporary structure to protect our most vulnerable children, not as a punishment of their parents.”

According to court documents filed by Lujan Grisham’s office in the case,  the Governor’s Office asserts that the policy has improved the lives of children who are “recovering today because CYFD was able to investigate substance-exposure reports promptly and uncover the serious risks that lay beneath the surface.”

The ACLU contended  that parents whose newborns were taken into state custody were denied due process and argued the practice is unconstitutional. Before July 2025, CYFD did not automatically take custody of and investigate newborns identified by hospital workers as drug exposed. Instead, infants could go home under “safety plans” and CYFD would investigate only if it received a separate report of abuse or neglect.

The ACLU alleged in its petition seeking an emergency stay that New Mexico, unlike at least 24 other states, does not consider infants abused or neglected solely because of prenatal drug exposure.   The ACLU argued this in their complaint filed:

“Under this zero-tolerance policy …. newborns are removed from their parents at birth, deprived of developmentally crucial bonding time, and ushered into a system with a proven lack of capacity to provide adequate care.”

In response to the civil complaint filed by the ACLU, the governor argued she acted in response to past tragedies, including the death of a 1-month-old boy born exposed to amphetamines, fentanyl and marijuana. In January 2025, the infant was found dead, face down on a heating pad in his crib. Months earlier, another substance-exposed infant suffered a fractured leg at just 3 months old.  The Governor’s Office argued that the ACLU, state Rep. Micaela Cadena, D-Mesilla, and state Sen. Linda Lopez, D-Albuquerque, lacked standing to bring the case. They further argued that parents can challenge removals through Children’s Court proceedings and argued this:

“The Directive makes the substance-exposed newborn’s health and safety the ‘paramount concern’ by utilizing existing authority to give CYFD the time to investigate and ensure that an infant can safely remain in the care of the parent who exposed them to a dangerous drug, multiple drugs or large amounts of alcohol — as opposed to simply letting the baby go and ‘hoping for the best.”

Maralyn Beck, founder and executive director of the nonprofit New Mexico Child First Network said this about the Supreme Court ruling denying the ACLU requested relief:

“We are relieved, if not overjoyed, to see the Supreme Court deny this petition. The governor’s directive is working … lives have been saved.”

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/court-upholds-policy-protecting-drug-exposed-newborns-in-nm/3058867

RECALLING NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE REPORT  OF THE NEW MEXICO CHILDREN YOUTH AND FAMILY’S DEPARTMENT

On April 8, New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez released a scathing 224 page report on the investigation by the New Mexico Department of Justice  (NMDOJ) of the New Mexico Children Youth and Family’s Department (CYFD) and its handling of abused and neglected children placed in CYFD care.  The investigation report is entitled “Systemic Failures: How CYFD Endangers The Children Its Meant To Protect”.  The link to review the entire 224 page report is here:

https://nmdoj.gov/publications/cyfd-report/

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The NMDOJ investigation into the CYFD identified systemic failures that have repeatedly endangered the children CYFD is sworn to protect. According to the report, these failures are not isolated but are pervasive, deeply entrenched, and all too often result in preventable harm to children.

The NMDOJ  investigation report contains the following Executive Summary that has been partially edited for brevity:

“New Mexico’s child welfare system is in crisis. The New Mexico Department of Justice (NMDOJ) investigation into the Children, Youth and Families Department (“CYFD”) …  identified systemic failures that have repeatedly endangered the children CYFD is sworn to protect. These failures are not isolated [and] they are pervasive, deeply entrenched, and too often result in preventable harm.

State law is unequivocal: CYFD should strive to preserve and reunify abused and neglected children with their families whenever possible, but when that goal conflicts with a child’s health and safety, the child’s interests must prevail.

The NMDOJ investigation makes one fact unmistakable: CYFD has completely inverted that legislative mandate and abandoned its core mission to protect children as its highest duty. Instead of safeguarding vulnerable children, the Department has prioritized family reunification at virtually any cost—returning children to dangerous caregivers with histories of substantiated abuse or chronic neglect, and who refuse treatment or services to address those underlying issues.

This misalignment between mandate and practice has had devastating consequences, including the deaths of at least seven children since [the] investigation’s inception. And this scale and severity of harm to children over the past year is not an anomaly. New Mexico has long faced disproportionately high levels of maltreatment, repeat maltreatment, and child fatalities compared to national averages.

Interviews, case reviews, and consultation with child welfare experts reveal a troubling pattern: CYFD selectively enforces its own rules—rigidly enforcing these rules when convenient but disregarding or misinterpreting them when compliance requires decisive intervention to protect children. Policies and protocols are often wielded as shields against accountability or disregarded altogether. When children are injured or killed, CYFD’s instinct is not transparency, but self-preservation—deflecting blame, concealing poor decisions, and protecting its image instead of confronting mistakes and embracing lessons that could prevent future harm.

 …  

The child welfare crisis is not an unavoidable reality, but the direct result of poor leadership, indefensible choices, missed interventions, and a widespread lack of transparency.

CYFD’s shortcomings go beyond mere bureaucratic mismanagement—they represent a systematic moral failing—measured in children continuing to be abused, neglected, and lost. The following case studies, documented throughout this report, offer a window into the human cost of that failing.

The NMDOJ’s investigation was not intended to merely catalog CYFD’s many missteps but rather serve as an urgent call to action for policymakers, stakeholders, the newly appointed [Child Advocate Office (AOC)], and leaders within CYFD.

The Department’s history of empty assurances and half-measures in safeguarding children are no longer acceptable—the price for delay and denial has been too high.

The path for CYFD to restore public trust is clear: acknowledge the depth and impact of their failures, institutionalize accountability, and embrace meaningful, lasting change. CYFD’s future legitimacy—and the safety and well-being of those it serves—depends on a renewed and unwavering commitment to its highest duty: putting children first.”

NMDOJ CONCERNS HIGHLIGHTED

The Justice Department said CYFD’s failures are in part fueled by the agency’s overcommitment to keeping at-risk families together. While Child Protective Services workers are obligated to make reasonable efforts to keep families together, the NMDOJ said CYFD must prioritize a child’s safety and not send a child back to a home where they are likely to be hurt again.  The NMDOJ investigation  report states:

“CYFD’s failures to make timely and common-sense decisions that prioritize child safety has been a central driver of New Mexico’s child maltreatment crisis.  In many cases, CYFD’s chronic inaction has led to extended delays in removing children from dangerous environments or not removing them at all.”

Justice Department investigators found that in many of the most severe abuse and neglect cases discussed in the report, CYFD made efforts to hide its failures, including by doctoring investigators’ accounts. NMDOJ investigators wrote this:

“When children are injured or killed, CYFD’s instinct is not transparency, but self-preservation — deflecting blame, concealing poor decisions, and protecting its image instead of confronting mistakes and embracing lessons that could prevent future harm.”

The Justice Department alleged that CYFD also obfuscated its investigation over the past year, resisting requests for child abuse and neglect records and releasing only some of the information requested. CYFD often cited an “inappropriately broad reading” of state laws protecting children’s privacy in abuse and neglect proceedings. The report states:

“CYFD’s approach was consistent: deflect, delay, and withhold. … CYFD’s application of confidentiality operates more as an impediment to transparency and accountability than as a genuine safeguard for the privacy of children and families.”

INVESTGATIVE REPORT CONCLUSION

The NMDOJ report ends with the following sobering conclusion:

“The NMDOJ’s investigation points unmistakably to one conclusion: CYFD has wholly abandoned child safety as its guiding principle. The witnesses interviewed and case studies highlighted show the grave harm that can result when CYFD delays removing vulnerable children from dangerous environments or reunifies them with families before underlying safety threats are resolved. Reunification should be the goal, but only when caregivers have meaningfully addressed the conditions that led to removal. A more deliberate child-centered approach is essential to ensure that reunification supports—not undermines—long-term family stability and child well-being.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

(EDITORS NOTE:  In the interest of full disclosure, Pete Dinelli served as an Assistant District Attorney  with the Bernalillo County District Attorney’s Office in the  mid 1980s and was  assigned to the Violent Crimes Division by then District Attorney Steve Schiff. Dinelli was one of two prosecutors that did a grand jury presentation and investigation of the state’s negligent handling of child abuse cases and neglect cases before the  Children, Youth and Family Department was created.  Many years later as Chief Deputy District Attorney appointed by then District Attorney Jeff Romero, Dinelli’s duties included supervision of the “Crimes Against Children” division that prosecuted child neglect and abuse cases.)

The lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of New Mexico and State  Representative  Micaela Cadena, D-Mesilla, and State Senatro Linda Lopez, D-Albuquerque seeking an emergency order to immediately halt Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s Executive Order placing drug-exposed newborns in state protective custody is what can be simply characterized as “Damned If You Do, Damn If You Don’t” litigation against the Governor and the State. It was an ill-advised lawsuit.

It’s more likely than not similar litigation would have been  filed if the State failed to intervene placing drug-exposed newborns in state protective custody. Over the past 30 plus years, many lawsuits have been filed against the Children’s Youth and Family department for their negligent handling of child abuse cases leading to an infant’s death or injuries  and millions of dollars have been awarded. It’s clear that the Governor’s  no tolerance policy is in fact working and saving lives given that more than 130 infants have entered foster care or other suitable placements since Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham instituted the directive on July 7, 2025.

The New Mexico Supreme Court unanimously rejecting the  American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) emergency petition to immediately halt Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s Executive Order  placing drug-exposed newborns in state protective custody was the right thing to do from a legal as well as  moral obligation. It was the right thing to do given the content of the New Mexico Department of Justice’s investigation of the New Mexico Children Youth and Family’s Department (CYFD) findings that its failures are in part fueled by the agency’s overcommitment to keeping at-risk families together.

The Governor’s Executive Order of placing drug-exposed newborns in state protective custody is the aggressive action demanded to overcome CYFD’s  abandonment of  child safety as its guiding principle as found by the Department of Justice investigation and  the grave harm that can result when CYFD delays removing vulnerable children from dangerous environments.

The safety of any child, especially the new born and children of tender years who cannot defend themselves against drug abuse, physical abuse or sexual abuse by their own parents, must always take precedence over trying to preserve a family unit. The blunt reality is that physical abuse, sexual abuse or drug exposure of any child at the hands of their own parents is evidence that a viable family unit no longer  exists or that the family unit is so dysfunctional that it is in the very best interest of the child to separate the child from the family.  In such instances, the state has a moral obligation to intervene to protect the health, safety and welfare of a newborn or child of tender years. 

New Mexico courts must and can do more. The level of corruption and dereliction of duty by CYFD is likely so extensive that it would be best to abolish the department because of the level of incompetence and physical and mental injury to so many children over so many decades. The suffering and abuse of New Mexico’s children is preventable and must be stopped. The New Mexico Courts need to intervene and order the takeover of CYFD with the appointment of  a special master to begin an aggressive agenda  to bring the department under control until the legislature can act. The New Mexico legislature needs to step in and abolish the Children’s Youth and Family Department and create a new, independent  agency that is overseen by a governing board.

City Council Passes Ban On Sitting, Sleeping On Sidewalks To Deal With Unhoused; Safe Outdoor Spaces To Be Offered At Gateway West Shelter; City Announces New Diversion Program; COMMENTARY: New Diversion Program Needs To Include Civil Mental Health Commitments Of Unhoused Who Are Danger To Selves And Others Or In  Need Of Addiction Medical Treatment

There are three major initiatives by the City Council and the Mayor Keller Administration directed at reducing the unhoused numbers on the streets of in Albuquerque. Those initiatives are:

  1. City Council enactment of the “Enhanced Service and Safety Zone Ordinance”.
  2. Safe Outdoor Spaces to be offered to  the unhoused at the Gateway West Shelter.
  3. A new City Diversion Program for the Unhoused

This article examines all three initiatives and their potential impact on getting the unhoused off the streets of Albuquerque. The article addresses the legal challenges, the statistical data on the unhoused and the millions being spent by the city to benefit so few as a majority chronic unhoused refuse city services. The article proposes civil mental health commitments as a viable solution to get the chronically unhoused off the streets of Albuquerque.

  1. “ENHANCED SERVICE AND SAFETY ZONE” ORDINANCE

On Monday, May 1, the Albuquerque City Council enacted the “Enhanced Service and Safety Zone Ordinance”.  Under the ordinance, it would be unlawful to sit, sleep, lie or camp on public sidewalks, streets, bike paths or alleys inside designated zones if the activity blocks pedestrian passage under the Americans with Disabilities Act. The ordinance says the designated zones are intended for commercial areas with high crime rates and recurring public safety concerns, including sidewalk obstructions and encampments.

The new ordinance allows enhanced city services, including increased Albuquerque Police Department patrols, more frequent Albuquerque Community Safety responses, sidewalk and street cleaning, graffiti abatement, trash collection and expanded code enforcement. Violations could carry penalties of up to $500 and up to 90 days in jail.

The new ordinance is an effort to address the proliferation of the homeless on city streets in the downtown area of the city. The ordinance allows the mayor to create designated enforcement areas for police and city sanitation workers to patrol more frequently. The ordinance  gives APD  the ability to issue a $500 fine or 30 days in jail time to anyone sitting, sleeping or lying on a public sidewalk in those zones after a written warning is ignored.

The  new ordinance empowers the Mayor’s Office to select problem areas around the city and justify imposing the new law at the selected areas. To be eligible, the area must be a concentrated commercial center, such as  Downtown, Uptown or Nob Hill. It also must have a documented high crime rate compared to the rest of the city and “recurring issues” with public camping or people living on the sidewalks.  Mayor Kellers  administration must submit a detailed plan to the City Council for approval, including the boundaries of the enhanced safety zone, evidence that the area meets the criteria and how the city plans to pay for it. The ordinance provides that  designated zones would last up to two years unless renewed by the City Council.

The ordinance  passed the city council on a 6 to 3 vote. Republican Councilors Renée Grout, Brook Bassan, Dan Lewis, Dan Champine and Democrats Klarissa Peña and Joaquín Baca all voted for the ordinance.  Progressive Democrats  Tammy Fiebelkorn, Nichole Rogers and City Councilor Stephanie Telles voted against the ordinance after they offered  numerous failed amendments in attempts to soften the law.

Links to quoted or relied upon news sources are here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/albuquerque-city-council-passes-ban-on-sitting-sleeping-on-sidewalks/3037005

https://www.kunm.org/kunm-news-update/2026-05-06/wed-albuquerque-city-council-passes-ban-on-sitting-sleeping-on-sidewalks-more

https://www.koat.com/article/new-sidewalk-rules-albuquerque-sitting-sleeping-lying-ordinance/71227538

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/albuquerque-city-council-passes-ordinance-banning-lying-sitting-or-sleeping-on-public-sidewalks/

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/new-sidewalk-ban-in-albuquerque-raises-concerns-for-people-facing-homelessness/

  1. SAFE OUTDOOR SPACES TO BE OFFERED TO THE UNHOUSED AT THE GATEWAY WEST SHELTER

On Wednesday, May 13, 2026, Mayor Tim Keller unveiled plans for a new Safe Outdoor Space at the Gateway West Shelter as part of the City of Albuquerque’s initiative to address homelessness. Keller said the site for the safe outdoor space by Gateway West is already under construction. On May 18 funding  was approved by the City Council in the approved F/Y 27  fiscal year budget.

The Gateway Shelter is the largest shelter in Albuquerque, whith the city claiming  it serves an average of 600 people per night. The proposed Gateway Safe Outdoor Space will provide showers, electricity and a place for an estimated number of between 15 to 50 people to set up tents and to camp ostensibly for how long they want.

Mayor Tim Keller said the outdoor space is “absolutely critical”  because the Gateway West is near capacity and contradicting himself when he says there  are always beds available at the shelter which can accommodate up to 669 people. The city has made renovations to Gateway West in recent years in response to cleanliness and safety concerns by the unhoused who prefer living on the streets to the shelter provided by the Gateway West shelter.  The proposed site comes as the unhoused population around the city grows, with almost 3,000 people reported to be living on the streets, according to the last annual Point-In-Time count, released in November.

City officials believe that, by locating the Safe Outdoor Space at Gateway West, they’ll be able to coordinate access to transportation, hygiene resources, meals, shelter referrals, treatment connections, and long-term housing support. The development of the Gateway West shelter  includes finer points, such as when meals and transportation would be provided as well as services to the unhoused. The Gateway West safe outdoor space includes restrooms, shower accessibility and pad sites for tents.

It was in 2022 that Safe Outdoor Spaces as an alternative to private or city shelters were approved by the City Council allowing two for every 9 City Council Districts to house 50 people each. Albuquerque City councilors have paused, restricted or voted down proposed changes to regulate the sanctioned encampments over the years. Some councilors were for it, while others have been against it, after pushback from residential  property ownwrs and city residents. Out of almost a dozen applications, only one has been approved and it is a 10-tent capacity lot outside New Creation Church along Zuni SE, east of Pennsylvania.

Mayor Keller for his part has advocated for smaller safe outdoor spaces all over the city allowing 20 or fewer people. At one time Keller even advocated for 100 smaller safe outdoor spaces scattered all over the city  to accommodate 10 people each for 1,000 unhoused to camp.

Mayor Keller said this at his  May 13 press conference:

“This is a network, and we know that we want to have a continuum of care that starts from help on the streets where people are at to being able to provide a multitude of services, including even transportation. That’s why ACS is here as well. … We also want to make sure that eventually that leads to housing. This is something we’ve been working on for many years, but we’re getting closer and closer to having that system. But one thing has been loud and clear as we develop an all-in approach to our options for the unhoused, and it’s that we need more safe outdoor living. … A lot of folks we offer help to say no, but we know that they would say yes if it was a safe outdoor space.”

City Spokesperson Gilbert Gallegos  said the location beside Gateway West was chosen “due to its existing shelter infrastructure and supportive services [and to]  help create a smoother transition pathway for individuals seeking access to additional indoor shelter and support services.”

https://www.koat.com/article/homelessness-safe-outdoor-space-new-mexico/71297661

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/city-details-plan-for-safe-outdoor-space-near-west-side-shelter/3042031

  1. NEW CITY DIVERSION PROGRAM INITIATIVE

On Friday, May 5, Mayor Keller announced a new  Diversion Program aimed at offering services and treatment to the unhoused who are cited, and often eventually arrested, for blocking sidewalks and similar city code violations.

The proposed Fiscal Year 27 City Budget line item  submitted to the City Council by Mayor Keller for the Diversion Program  was originally for  $400,000,  but the City Council reduced the amount to $200,000 in the approved F/Y 27 budget as a compromise after the City  Council  demanded further specifics on the diversion program.

The new diversion initiative will be  led by the City Attorney’s Office and it is  designed to address the cycle of low-level, non-violent offenses that often result in brief and ineffective periods of detention without treatment or long-term resolution. Under new  diversion program, eligible individuals will be assessed by a social worker or case manager at the point of prosecution and offered structured diversion options, including shelter intake, case management, substance use or mental health treatment, or other supportive services.

This approach shifts the City’s response from a system that cycles individuals through arrest and release to one that uses legal intervention as a pathway into services, while maintaining accountability for participation.  By aligning enforcement with treatment and housing resources, the program is designed to reduce recidivism, decrease strain on the courts and detention system, and improve outcomes for individuals experiencing homelessness and behavioral health challenges.

Mayor Keller said that since February the Albuquerque Police Department had been testing the program and had already diverted 85 people into services of some kind.  City spokesperson Gilbert Gallegos said those diversions were transporting people to Gateway West, Gateway East and the Medical Sobering Center. Another city spokesperson said the $400,000 would go toward funding the courtroom aspect, providing an attorney, paralegal and social worker.

City Attorney Keefe said the city worked with Metropolitan Court, the Bernalillo County District Attorney’s Office (DA)  and the Law Offices of the Public Defender (LOPD).  She said the LOPD, would be “taking the lead on identifying the best way to get people connected with resources.”

Keefe said many details of the diversion program were still being ironed out.

The program will offer weekly open hearings at the courthouse where those cited for violating public ordinances can come in and have onsite access to city services including treatment and housing. Keller said this:

“The idea is, of course, acknowledging that at the end of the day we can’t simply just cycle vulnerable individuals through jail and back out on the street … Both of those are not the right answer and we actually developed an alternative… that a court would suggest treatment instead of the court system, but also not letting folks just walk right out back onto the street.”

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/city-announces-diversion-program-aimed-at-those-cited-for-blocking-sidewalks-camping/3043589

All that is mentioned is “legal intervention” without addresses  mandatory measures.  Absent from the new City diversion program is any specific mention of civil mental health commitment hearings of the unhoused who pose an immediate danger to themselves or others or who are suffering from drug addiction.

BERNALILLO COUNTY METROPOLITAN DIVERSION COURT

It was on January 6, 2026 that  the Metropolitan Court Diversion Court was launched. The new court will redirect people with serious mental illness into treatment as an alternative to criminal prosecution for minor and nonviolent crimes. The new court will deal with people who previously have had criminal charges dismissed because they were found incompetent to stand trial. The criminal competency Diversion Court is the fifth such program statewide and is  the first in the state’s largest county.

During the recent Special Session of the New Mexico legislature that ended on October 2, 2025,  the legislature enacted legislation which allows the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Court to determine competency which previously was only allowed by the State District Court. A recent report by the New Mexico Justice Reinvestment Working Group found that 65% of individuals who enter the state’s criminal justice system have a behavioral health need and the criminal justice system cannot provide necessary medical treatment and facilities.

State lawmakers appropriated $293,000 a year for the Diversion Court which will pay for a program coordinator and two case managers, or navigators, to direct people to appropriate mental health and substance-abuse treatment and basic services such as housing. The funding also will pay for the program’s behavioral health service provider, Albuquerque-based A New Awakening.

The Diversion Court  provides people who are unhoused with the opportunity to resolve pending misdemeanor cases, outstanding warrants and unpaid fines, all of which can pose barriers to housing and employment opportunities and hinder progress toward self-sufficiency. The Diversion Court will be able to do more when it comes to the homeless who suffer from severe mental illness or who are drug addicted and are a danger to themselves and others.

Candidates for the program are people charged with misdemeanors and nonviolent felonies, excluding those facing drunken-driving charges. The program comes at a time when encampment sweeps around Albuquerque have increased significantly and have  led to an increase in misdemeanor charges like unlawful camping and blocking the sidewalk. The program provides an alternative for a judge who otherwise would have little choice but to dismiss the charges.

In cases involving the unhoused or those with mental illness, misdemeanor citations often lead to jail stays down the line due to missed court hearings. According to a Bernalillo County jail population dashboard, just over 7,000 people were booked on misdemeanor charges in 2025. The competency diversion program is intended to guide people with severe mental illness into services that may include housing, medical needs and appropriate mental health or substance-use treatment.

At the January 6 ceremony announcing the Diversion Court, where upwards of 100 people attended, New Mexico Supreme Court Justice Briana H. Zamora shared her experiences as a trial judge where he observed a decline in the well-being of criminal defendants who returned to her courtroom time and again. Judge Zamora said this:

“At the beginning, especially here at Metro Court, they would come with their family members, their relatives, their friends. … After about 20 or 30 cases, or a few years later, they came alone. They were unhoused and they had no support. [Struggling families would ask to order treatment and services]  and within the constraints of the law, I was unable to do so. … I as a judge, of course, I want to apply the law, but I also want to ensure that justice is done. And without any programs in place, without any place to refer them, my hands were tied. There was nothing I could do, and it just broke my heart to see these families and friends who were desperately trying to help out their loved ones and had no avenue to do so. …” 

Bernalillo County Metro Court Judge Nina Safier is the Presiding Judge for the Diversion Court. She said the criminal competency diversion court is intended to restore services to people caught up for years in the criminal justice system. Judge Safier said this:

“By the time you end up in jail, you have fallen through many cracks. … We have to reconnect people with the services that got pulled from underneath them, because the criminal justice system and jail is not going to help. … As a competency court judge, the most common request I hear is, ‘Judge, we just want them to get help.’ And as Justice Zamora said, the answer before was, ‘That’s not the process.’ Now the process can take on a new direction. You can reconnect with the services that people suffering — our communities are watching, their families want them to get help.”

Judge Safier said a key element of the Diversion Court is trained staff who can help obtain treatment and services for people who otherwise have difficulty navigating the system. She said staff members also can bump people to the head of the line for needed services.

Bennett Baur, the chief public defender for the New Mexico Law Offices of the Public Defender, said he is uncertain how the program will work but applauded the effort to find alternatives to prosecution for people with severe mental illness. Baur said this:

“I think it’s a really good thing for us to look at different ways to address serious behavioral health issues, rather than just depending upon prosecution, jail and prison, which clearly doesn’t work for these folks. … I’m concerned that there may not be enough appropriate treatment, but let’s give this a chance.”

The Administrative Office of the Courts has launched four competency diversion courts since mid-2024. Those courts are  in the 3rd Judicial District in Las Cruces, the 4th Judicial District in Las Vegas, the 1st Judicial District in Santa Fe and the 12th Judicial District in Otero and Lincoln counties.  So far, nearly 60 people statewide have already graduated from the diversion court programs.

EXTENT OF CRISIS 

A recent report  by the New Mexico Justice Reinvestment Working Group astonishingly found that 65% of individuals who enter the state’s criminal justice system have a behavioral health need and that the criminal justice system cannot provide necessary medical  treatment and facilities. According to Kaiser Family Foundation data, New Mexico has one of the nation’s highest suicide rates, and more than one-third of state residents reported anxiety or a depressive disorder in 2023.

Adrian Avila, the chief of staff for the New Mexico  Senate Finance Committee, was tasked with taking the lead on crafting the package after a special session called by Gov. Michelle Lujan Grisham ended with the Democratic-controlled Legislature declining to take up all of the governor’s crime-focused agenda.

Avila went so far as to traveled to Miami Florida  with behavioral health advocates to tour  the  Miami-Dade County  Court diversion program that has drawn accolades for its success. Avila said the “Miami model” would not be totally feasible in New Mexico because the state’s population is not as densely concentrated.

Avila described the package that grew out of countless meetings and negotiations as a “bottom-up” approach to tackling mental health and drug abuse issues across the state.

On February 4, 2025,  Avila told the Senate Finance committee this:

“We’re creating an entire ecosystem here.”

Democrat Majority Floor Leader Peter Wirth of Santa Fe and Republican Senate Minority Floor leader William Sharer of Farmington  jointly sponsored Senate Bill 1 of the behavioral health legislation. On February 4, 2025, they presented their legislation together to the Senate Public Affairs Committee. Several other top Republicans and Democrats  teamed up to carry the bills. Republican Senator Sharer said this of the $1 Billion funding:

“Things are getting worse, not better. … This is a huge, huge amount of money, but also a huge accountability piece. … So this is it.”

The links to the relied upon or quoted news sources are here:

https://www.kob.com/new-mexico/new-pilot-program-aims-to-break-cycle-for-nonviolent-offenders/

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/metro-court-program-offers-new-treatment-options/2955055

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/metro-court-program-aims-to-treat-mentally-ill-defendants/2952594

THE UNHOUSED NUMBERS IN ALBUQUERQUE 

On November 17, 2025  the New Mexico Coalition to End Homlessness  released the  most recent 2025 Point-In-Time (PIT) Report for the numbers of unhoused in Albuquerque. The PIT survey  found that at least 2,960 people in Albuquerque called the streets or an emergency shelter their home with nowhere else to go. Of that number,1,367 people were completely unsheltered with no roof over their heads, living on the streets or in emergency shelters. The 2025 PIT report revealed an 8% increase in homelessness going from 2,740 in 2024 to 2,960 in 2025, an increase of 220 people.

A 2025 report by the city found 30% of individuals experiencing homelessness self report having a serious mental illness25% self report having a substance use disorder and upwards of  66% experience some form of mental health condition. A report by the New Mexico Justice Reinvestment Working Group found that 65% of individuals who enter the state’s criminal justice system have behavioral health needs and the criminal justice system cannot provide necessary medical  treatment and facilities. A major  problem is that approximately 75%  to 80% of the chronic, emergency unhoused simply refuse city services, yet the city spends upwards of $55 to $85  million a year on contracts to provide services and assistance to the unhoused

Over the past four years during Mayor Keller’s second term, the number of bookings in Bernalillo County’s jail classified as “homeless” or “transient” has skyrocketed  to nearly 12,000 in 2025, from 3,670 in 2022, with much of  the increase in numbers attributed to  repeat offenders. In recent months, the share of people booked who are transient made up about 49% of the jail’s population. Last year, 1,256 people were charged with sidewalk obstruction misdemeanors which is nearly six times the number of cases from the previous eight years combined.  This has occurred as the average daily population at the jail from July 2024 through June 2025 reached its highest point in a decade. On some days last year, the Bernalillo County Metropolitan Detention Center held more homeless people than the Gateway Shelter on the west side which is the  largest local shelter.

The city’s homeless population has more than doubled from 2022 to 2025, while the increase in homeless people jailed by the county has more than tripled during the same time period. Police and court records and interviews with homeless people show the increase in their incarceration is primarily driven by the cascading effects of repeatedly citing people who are experiencing homelessness.

CITY’S FINANCIAL COMITMENT TO UNHOUSE

In the last three years, the city has spent upwards of $300 million on homeless shelters, programs and purchasing and remodeling motels for low-income housing. In 2021, the city acquired the Lovelace Hospital complex on Gibson for $15 million and then spent upwards of $90 million to remodel it into the Gateway shelter.

Mayor Keller’s  approved FY/26 General Fund budget by the City Council for Health, Housing and Homeless Department (HHH) totals $52.6 million, an increase of $1.4 million, or 2.7% above the FY/25 original budget.  The FY/26 approved budget lists  116  separate contracts for services benefiting directly or indirectly to the unhoused totals $53,901,355. The 115 separate contracts totaling $53,901,355  include:

  • 32 for Affordable Housing Contracts totaling                  $30,391,436
  • 12 for Emergency Shelter contracts totaling                   $  6,347,819
  • 16 for Health and Human Services Contracts totaling    $  1,962,486
  • 28 for Homeless Support Services contracts totaling     $   5,746,188
  • 11 for Mental Health Contracts totaling                           $   2,995,400
  • 12 for Substance Abuse contracts totaling                      $  2,573,526
  • 5  for Gateway Shelter operating contracts totaling        $   3,884,500

116  SERVICE CONTRACTS         TOTAL CONTRACTS       $ 53,901,355

The link to review the approved  FY/26 budget for the HHH department, page 209, is here:

Click to access fy26-approved-final.pdf

Mayor Tim Keller’s proposed and approved FY/27 General Fund budget submitted to the City Council for the Health, Housing and Homeless Department is  $48.9 million and it is an increase of 9.5% or $4.3 million above the FY/26 original budget with 98 full time employees.  Listed in the HHH proposed FY/27 budget are 122 separate contracts for services directly or indirectly to the unhoused totaling $85,283,474. The 122 separate contracts totaling $85,283,47 include:

  • 34 for Affordable Housing Contracts totaling                      $35,534,228
  • 13 for Emergency Shelter contracts totaling                      $10,230,537
  • 14 forHealth and Human Services Contracts totaling         $ 2,418,638
  • 23 for Homeless Support Services contracts totaling         $ 6,091,714
  • 11 for Mental Health Contracts totaling                               $ 3,925,400
  • 12 for Substance Abuse contracts totaling                          $ 5,530,478
  • 15 for Gateway Shelter operating contracts totaling          $21,552,479

122  SERVICE CONTRACTS         TOTAL CONTRACTS         $85,283,471

It is understood that the City Council  has never ordered an audit of all  the service contracts to determine the extent of funding that goes directly to the benefit of the unhoused.

The link to review the proposed FY/27 budget for the HHH department, page 124, is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/documents/fy27-proposed-budget-with-weblink-final-4-01-2026.pdf

Links to other quoted or relied upon sources are here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/article_42aba680-62c4-4228-95a2-da72df1a34e1.html

https://citydesk.org/2025/09/10/albuquerque-becomes-new-mexicos-homeless-hub-as-gateway-contracts-add-100-beds/?mc_cid=b9e7b25ad7&mc_eid=001367acf1

 THE GATEWAY SYSTEM OF SHELTERS

The Gateway Shelter Network consists of 5 shelters costing a staggering $300 Million dollars spent over the last 4 years to assist between 3,000 to 5,000 unhoused. The City has become New Mexico’s de facto “homeless capitol”  providing shelter and services to the homeless for all communities throughout New Mexico. The problem is that the City and the State’s unhoused numbers are getting worse and not any better after spending so many millions.

The Gateway Network of support for people struggling with homelessness and drug and substance addiction consists of the following:

  1. Gateway Center– (Located on Gibson.) Campus providing medical, behavioral, and social services including overnight beds, first responder intake, medical sobering and respite. Old Lovelace Hospital city purchased for $15 million costing $95 million to remodel into shelter with city officials saying upwards of 1,000 unhoused per month are being provided assistance.
  2. Gateway West – Safe, supportive 660-bed facility for individuals experiencing homelessness, offering specialized resources and case management. (City officials say the annual impact is services to 5,700 Individuals. Open 24/7 Since 2019)
  3. Gateway Family – Supportive housing center for families with overnight beds, meals, and case management to help achieve stable housing. (City officials say the annual impact is 987 individuals being served, Open Since 2020.)
  4. Gateway Recovery– 50-resident micro-community offering low-barrier beds, recovery services, and support for 18 – 24 months. City officials say the annua projected impact is 50 – 100 being served. Opening Early 2025
  5. Gateway Young Adult – Housing and support for young adults ages 15-25 experiencing homelessness, tailored to their unique needs. City officials say the projected impact is 120 Individuals being served. Opened March, 2026.

STATUTES AND ORDINANCES ENUMERATED

New Mexico Statutes and City Ordinances have been enacted that are relied upon to deal with unlawful camping and trespass and all are used to deal with the unhoused. All the laws have been on the books for decades and are applicable and are enforced against all citizens and not just the unhoused.

The specific statutes are:

  1. NMSA 1978, Section 30-14-1 (1995), defining criminal trespass on public and private property.
  2. NMSA 1978, Section 30-14-4 (1969), defining wrongful use of property used for a public purpose and owned by the state, its subdivisions, and any religious, charitable, educational, or recreational association.
  3. Albuquerque City Ordinance 12-2-3, defining criminal trespass on public and private property.
  4. Albuquerque City Ordinance 8-2-7-13, prohibiting the placement of items on a sidewalk so as to restrict its free use by pedestrians.
  5. Albuquerque City Ordinance 10-1-1-10, prohibiting being in a park at nighttime when it is closed to public use.
  6. Albuquerque City Ordinance 12-2-7, prohibiting hindering persons passing along any street, sidewalk, or public way.
  7. Albuquerque City Ordinance 5-8-6, prohibiting camping on open space lands and regional preserves.
  8. Albuquerque City Ordinance 10-1-1-3, prohibiting the erection of structures in city parks.

All the above listed laws are classified as “non-violent crimes” and are misdemeanors.  The filing of criminal charges by law enforcement are discretionary when the crime occurs in their presence. The new “Enhanced Service and Safety Zone Ordinance” likewise is a misdemeanor and classified as “non-violent crimes.”

CIVIL RIGHTS LAWSUITE OVER ENCAMPMENTS

In 2017,  a civil rights lawsuit was filed where the city was accused of causing overcrowding at the Metropolitan Detention Center by conducting routine encampment sweeps of what the Albuquerque Police Department called the “homeless mentally ill.” The lawsuit  ended in a settlement which the city moved to dismiss in March. In response, the plaintiff’s attorneys argued that the city, rather than fulfilling the terms and conditions of the settlement, actually “turned back the clock” and resumed pre-settlement strategies to reduce visible homelessness.

Private attorney Ryan Villa, one of the Plaintiff attorneys in the case against the city contends the City of Albuquerque and the Albuquerque Police Department have failed to live up to a 2017 agreement to remedy unconstitutional and unlawful practices affecting those living on the streets. Villa said this:  “In our view, the city is using Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC)  as a temporary homeless shelter.”

In a response to the Motion to Dismiss, the plaintiffs’ attorneys contend the city has “turned back the clock” and resumed the “very same tactics” that led to the agreement. Villa in a  30-page response to the city’s motion wrote this:

“The City has significantly and openly increased criminal enforcement against nonviolent misdemeanants, particularly the unhoused and those with mental illness, and begun crowding the jail via the adoption of systematic practices and formal enforcement policies at odds with the Settlement Agreement terms and purpose. ”

The City’s Motion to Dismiss is still pending.

The link to the relied upon and quoted news source is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/attorneys-say-city-using-jail-as-homeless-shelter/3003486

US SUPREME COURT CASE GRANTS PASS V. JOHNSON

It was on  June 28, 2024 the United State Supreme Court announced its ruling in the case of Grants Pass v. Johnson where the court held that local laws effectively criminalizing homelessness do not violate the U.S. Constitution and do not constitute cruel and unusual punishment.

The case challenged a municipality’s ability to bar people from sleeping or camping in public areas, such as sidewalks and parks. The case is strikingly similar in facts and circumstances and laws to the case filed against the City of Albuquerque over the closure of Coronado Park.

The United States Supreme Court  considered whether cities can enforce laws and take action against or punish the unhoused for sleeping outside in public spaces when shelter space is lacking. The case is the most significant case heard by the high court in decades on the rights of the unhoused and comes as a rising number of people in the United States are without a permanent place to live.

In a 6-3 decision along ideological lines, the Supreme Court  reversed a ruling by a San Francisco-based appeals court that found outdoor sleeping bans amount to “cruel and unusual punishment” under the United States Constitution. The majority found that the 8th Amendment prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment does not extend to bans on outdoor sleeping in public places such as parks and streets. The Supreme Court ruled  that cities can enforce bans on homeless people sleeping outdoors, even in West Coast areas where shelter space is lacking.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The three initiatives consisting of the City Council’s enactment of the “Enhanced Service and Safety Zone Ordinance”, the new Gateway West Shelter Safe Outdoor Spaces to be offered to  the unhoused and the  new City Diversion Program combined offer a real  potential of having a major impact of removing the unhoused from the streets of Albuquerque. However more can and must be done with respect to requiring and mandating  the unhoused to get off the streets and ordering them into the mental health or drug addiction treatment they desperately need.

CIVIL MENTAL HEALTH COMMITMENTS

The city’s new diversion program involving the District Attorney, the Public Defender and the City Attorney’s Office needs to go further. It needs to include a coordinated effort amongst the 3 cooperating agencies to  include initiating civil mental health commitments of the unhoused suffering from mental illness and/or drug addiction posing a serious danger to themselves or the public to be filed in the Metro Court Diversion Court.

The Albuquerque Police Department and the city’s Community Safety Department know who the “frequent flyers” are and who need to be taken immediately off the streets because they pose and immediate threat to themselves and others.  Both departments could and should assist the District Attorney, the Public Defender an the City Attorney with civil mental health commitments of the unhoused and file civil mental commitment actions.

The Bernalillo County District Attorney’s Office and the Albuquerque City Attorney’ office  should form specialized unit of at least four attorneys to deal exclusively with civil mental commitment actions in the Metropolitan Court’s new Diversion Court. The state or courts would  provide  funding for  the mental health services provided by the state through the Behavioral Health Trust Fund and  the Behavioral Health Reform Package.

The District Attorney should  cross deputized Assistant City Attorney’s, supported with para legals, to initiate mental health commitment to work in unison with the Bernalillo County District Attorney’s Office. Such an arrangement of cross deputization of Assistant City Attorney’s has occurred in the past with the City Attorney’s Metro Court Traffic Court arraignment program that processed at one time 60,000 cases a year negotiating plea agreements.

It is understood The Gateway Shelter on Gibson, which is the former Lovelace Medical Center and Hospital, is still largely vacant and has upwards of 200 patient rooms that are vacant. The Gateway Shelter on Gibson should be utilized for referrals by the Metropolitan Court’s “Diversion Court” with the State providing mental health services to those committed for mental health and substance abuse treatment.

FINAL COMMENTS

Being unhoused or being destitute are not crimes. Government, be it federal or local, have a moral obligation to help and assist the unhoused, especially those that are mentally ill or who are drug addicted. The city under Mayor Keller has spent upwards of $300 million to help the unhoused over the last  4 years.

The City of Albuquerque is spending upwards of $53 million (approved FY/26 budget) to $85 million (proposed FY/27 budget) a year on homeless services with 116 to 122  service provider contracts including for 5  Gateway Emergency shelters, subsidized housing, food and medical care and drug counseling. However, the City Council merely rubber stamps what the Keller administration has negotiated. The City Council   has never ordered an audit of all  the service contracts to determine the extent of funding that goes directly to the benefit of the unhoused and to the benefit of the service providers.

Notwithstanding all the millions being spent, surveys have revealed that  between 75% to 80% of the chronically unhoused refuse or decline city shelter, housing, services and financial help offered or simply say they are not satisfied with what is being offered by the city.

The unhoused are not above the law. They cannot be allowed to just ignore the law, illegally camp wherever they want for as long as they want and as they choose, when they totally reject all government housing or shelter assistance. The City has every right to enforce its laws on behalf of its citizens to preserve and protect the public health, safety and welfare of all its citizens.

Allowing the homeless to use, congregate and camp anywhere they want for as long as they want in violation of city laws and ordinances should never be considered as an option to deal with the homeless given all the financial  resources and  the millions being  spent to assist them.

Unlawful encampment squatters who refuse city services and all alternatives to living on the street, who want to camp at city parks, on city streets in alleys and trespass in open space give the city no choice but to take action and make it totally inconvenient for them to “squat” anywhere they want, for how long as they want, and force them to move on and perhaps even arrest for felonies found.

Too many elected and government officials and civil rights advocates have a hard time dealing with the fact that many homeless adults simply want to live out  their life as they choose, camp where they want to for as long as they can get away with it, without any government nor family interference and especially no government rules and no regulations.

No county and no municipality should ever be required to just simply ignore and to not enforce anti-camping ordinances, vagrancy laws, civil nuisance abatement laws and criminal laws designed to protect the general public’s health, safety and welfare of a community.

The link to a related to related, relied upon,  quoted news sources are here:

https://www.propublica.org/article/albuquerque-homelessness-citations-surge-tim-keller

https://www.college.police.uk/app/operations/operational-planning/tactical-planning

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/city-announces-diversion-program-aimed-at-those-cited-for-blocking-sidewalks-camping/3043589

https://www.petedinelli.com/2026/03/30/arrests-bookings-and-jailing-of-unhouse-spike-jailing-no-solution-commentary-civil-mental-health-commitments-and-diversion-court-best-chance-to-get-unhoused-suffering-from-mental-illness-and-drug/

 

City Hall Spending Increases 53% Over 9 years Under Mayor Tim Keller; Astonishing Funding Made For So Few Unhoused For Services And Shelter They Do Not Want; Keller And City Council Need To Find  Better Approach To Unhoused Crisis To Get Them Off Streets

On December 1, 2017, Mayor Tim Keller was sworn into office for his first of three four year terms after being elected each time with landslide margins. He has now submitted a total of 9 annual budgets reviewed and approved by the City Council.

This article addresses the recently enacted 2017 City Hall Budget and discusses the  dramatic 53% increase in city hall budgets over the 8 and a half  years Mayor Keller has been in office  and the funding made for services and shelter for the unhoused they do not want.

2027 CITY BUDGET APPROVED

On May 18, 2026 the Albuquerque City Council voted to approve the City’s Fiscal Year 2027 budget with  the passage of a City Council Resolution which appropriated $1.5 billion for operating the City Of Albuquerque for the fiscal year that begins on July 1, 2026 and ends on June 30, 2027. There are 27 City Departments.  Each budget is reviewed by the council by what is called the Committee of the Whole made up of all city councilors. The city budget is what is called a performance-based budget. Throughout the year, city departments are tasked with compiling statistics and information on the departments to justify budgets and  increases or decreases in personnel levels.

On June 9, it was reported that  Mayor Tim Keller allowed the 10-day signing deadline for the enacted budget to pass without any line item vetos.  The budget become law without his signature.  Under the city charter rules, the budget automatically took effect once that deadline expired.

SHELTER AND SERVICES TO UNHOUSED TOP PRIORITY

Under the city council’s approved fiscal year ‘27 budget, increased services to the unhoused remain the City’s top priorities in the approved budget. The approved budget directs more resources to frontline response to deal with the unhoused.

ALBUQUERQUE COMMUNITY SAFETY (ACS)

Albuquerque Community Safety (ACS) was given a 10.5% budget increase to $19.8 million for the  2027 fiscal year, including $261,000 for raises. The budget increase is intended to increase field response and street outreach. ACS personnel have backgrounds as social workers, clinicians and counselors and respond to 911 calls reporting people suffering from addiction, homelessness and mental health emergencies. The approved budget would fund 156 full-time positions, up from 142 currently. The ACS department will have a $2 million investment to expand field response and double the size of its Street Outreach Team, freeing up APD officers and strengthening the City’s ability to respond to behavioral health calls and homelessness with specialized, civilian-led interventions. $500,000 would be reallocated for motel vouchers.

HOMELESSNESS, HOUSING, AND BEHAVIORAL HEALTH DEPARTMENT

The council approved  FY27 budget continues to build a coordinated system of care designed to move individuals from crisis to stability through outreach, shelter, treatment, and housing. The coordinated system is know as the Gateway system.

The approved  FY27  budget increases funding by 9.5% to $48.9 million for the city’s Health, Housing and Homelessness Department, and fully funds the Gateway System of Care  for the unhouse. The council approved FY27 budget includes $8 million for affordable housing vouchers. The approved budget contains funding for 98 full-time positions, of which 78 are paid from the city’s general fund. Another 20 personnel are  paid by grant funding.

The Gateway System is fully funded under the  FY27 budget to ensure operational stability as services continue to come online, supporting shelter, treatment, and housing pathways for those most in need. Expanded outreach through ACS will strengthen connections into this system and improve coordination across services.

The Gateway System of support for people struggling with homelessness and drug and substance addiction consists of the following:

  1. Gateway Center– (Located on Gibson.) Campus providing medical, behavioral, and social services including overnight beds, first responder intake, medical sobering and respite. Old Lovelace Hospital city purchased for $15 million costing $95 million to remodel into shelter and supposedly providing  assistance to upwards of 1,000 unhoused per month.
  2. Gateway West – Safe, supportive 660-bed facility for individuals experiencing homelessness, offering specialized resources and case management. Annual Impact: 5,700 Individuals. Open 24/7 Since 2019.
  3. Gateway Family – Supportive housing center for families with overnight beds, meals, and case management to help achieve stable housing. Annual Impact: 987 Individuals Open Since 2020.
  4. Gateway Recovery– 50-resident micro-community offering low-barrier beds, recovery services, and support for 18 – 24 months. Annual projected Impact: 50 – 100.
  5. Gateway Young Adult – Housing and support for young adults ages 15-25 experiencing homelessness, tailored to their unique needs. Annual projected Impact: 120 Individuals. On March 25, the city opened the $17 million transitional housing facility for homeless youth

https://www.cabq.gov/health-housing-homelessness/gateway-system-of-care

The Health, Housing and Homelessness Department budget also includes targeted investments, like $500,000 in reallocated funding to support motel vouchers through expanded outreach efforts, providing immediate, flexible shelter options in partnership with Albuquerque Community Safety Department (ACS).

JAEMES SHANLEY GUEST COLUMN ANALYIZING CITY HALL SPENDING UNDER KELLER

Following is a guest opinion column on the City’s budget process submitted  by community activist Jaemes Shanley after he attended City Council meetings on the ’27 fiscal year budget. The report is a review of the astonishing spending increases over the last 10 years for basic essential government services with 8 of those fiscal years under Mayor Keller. What is clear is that there is a disproportionate emphasis given to deal with the city’s unhoused with little progress made as the unhoused continue to increase on the streets.

“Probably like me, most residents of Albuquerque would consider it a toss-up whether to delve into the city’s annual budgeting process or have a root canal.

That is unless you have been connected to Albuquerque for a long time (since 1969 in my case) and are frequently out on the streets to see the state of things here.  That is what prompted me to download the full 238-page fiscal year 2027 budget document, covering July 1, 2026 through June 30, 2027, when it was announced in early April.

 https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/documents/fy27-proposed-budget-with-weblink-final-4-01-2026.pdf

 Perusing it to obtain specific understanding of how Mayor Keller’s administration “remains committed to delivering a safer, cleaner, and more functional city while building long-term capacity in the systems that support our community”, as he describes in his introductory letter to City Council,  was not particularly enlightening.  It is not a lack of data therein.  It is, on the contrary, an abundance of data presented with insufficient context, connection, outcomes and trends that can be observed and confirmed in our community.”

ANNUAL CITY COUNICIL BUDGET PROCESS

The process by which budgets are reviewed, amended, and ultimately approved by City Council involves three meetings of a Committee-Of -The-Whole, consisting of the entire Council membership and chaired this year by District 9 Councilor Renée Grout.  In the first two sessions the Committee heard comment from the public about aspects of the budget and engaged with administrators, specialists, and directors within the Mayor’s administration.  The third did not permit public comment on the budget but focused on queries directed at the Administration.

All three meetings can be viewed on videos accessible via the CABQ legistar website    https://cabq.legistar.com/Calendar.aspx

The first of these ran 7 ½ hours, of which 48 minutes was public comment.

The ensuing dialog with city administrative staff provided an object lesson in the seeming disconnect between City Council and the Administration in understanding of the proposed budget.  Given Council’s access year-round to supplemental data and explanation from the administration, to which citizen taxpayers are not privileged, and, in spite of that, Council members apparent challenges and frustration getting their heads around the budget, it is no wonder outside observers can feel figuratively stuck in the dark of a forest that keeps understanding in the shade.

What is particularly absent in documents, budget dialog, and the inter Council and Administration sniping is a true long-term perspective on the evolution of our city government over the past decade or longer.  The budget is instead presented and discussed as if where we find ourselves today is the inevitable product of an intensely focused, responsible, and pragmatic process and evolution.

I concluded the only way to verify this was to extract budget data for revenue, spending and personnel counts for multiple years from the approved budget documents for each year stretching back to 2007, also available at the city’s website.

So that is what I did.

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/budget/annual-budget

What emerged was troubling, especially recognizing that Albuquerque is not a dramatically better city today than it was 20 years ago. This fact is evidenced by the number and conditions of unhoused folks living on the streets, empty and abandoned buildings (including iconic 17 story architectural landmarks), vacant lots dispersed city-wide, unleased commercial real estate, and an historic building on Central Avenue downtown collapsing into the street mere days after it was closed by Code Enforcement.

CITY REVENUE SOURCES HIGHLIGHTS

Here are the highlights that stood out to me from aggregating data from city budget documents starting in 2007:

The 2027 budget reflects a $34.9 million reduction from the 2026 budget.

In every year budgets match projected revenue, almost to the penny.

2018 CITY REVENUE SOURCES, DOLLAR AMOUNTS, AND PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTION WERE:

  • Gross Receipts Tax:                                $ 338.2 million  (35.3%)
  • Interfund & Fund Balance & Adj.:          $ 157.5 million  (16.5%)
  • Property Tax:                                           $ 154.0 million  (16.1%)
  • Enterprise Proceeds:                              $ 147.1 million  (15.4%)
  • Intergovernmental:                                  $ 54.3 million    (5.7%)
  • Charges & Permits:                                 $  48.5 million    (5.1%)
  • Other Taxes:                                             $  42.0  million   (4.4%)
  • Miscellaneous:                                        $   14.8 million    (1.6%)

TOTAL                                                                 $ 956.7 million

2027 PROJECTED CITY REVENUE SOURCES, DOLLAR AMOUNTS, AND PERCENTAGE CONTRIBUTION ARE:

  • Gross Receipts Tax:                               $ 616.4 million    (42.0%)
  • Interfund & Fund Balance & Adj.          $ 238.6 million     (16.3%)
  • Property Tax:                                          $  200.9 million    (13.7%)
  • Enterprise Proceeds:                             $ 187.5 million     (12.8%)
  • Charges & Permits:                                $   75.2  million    (5.1%)
  • Intergovernmental:                                 $   73.9  million    (5.0%)
  • Other Taxes:                                            $   57.0  million    (3.9%)
  • Miscellaneous:                                        $  16. 3  million    (1.1%)

TOTAL                                                                 $1,466.1 million

MAJOR HIGHLIGHTS

From 2010 (the final Mayor Martin Chavez administration budget) to 2018 (the final Mayor Richard Berry administration budget) total City of Albuquerque  spending increased by $52.4 million or by 6%.

City employee headcount from 2010 to 2018 decreased by only 123 or by -2%.

[On December 1, 2017, Mayor Tim Keller was sworn into office for his first of three four year terms.]  From 2018 to 2027 the  proposed City of Albuquerque budget spending increased by $509.4 million or by 53% under Mayor Keller [and during Keller’s eight years in office with a tax increase enacted during his first year in office in 2018.]

There are a total of 27 City Hall Departments. The  top 10 departments by spending in 2018 were as follows:

  1. Police Department                                           18.5% of total budget
  2. City Support Department                                10.7% of total budget
  3. Fire Department                                                 8.4% of total budget
  4. Solid Waste Department                                   7.9% of total budget
  5. Family, Community, Youth, (pre-HHH)             7.3% of total budget
  6. Human Resources Department                        6.6% of total budget
  7. Finance/Admin. Department                             6.6% of total budget
  8. Aviation Department                                          6.4% of total budget
  9. Municipal Development                                     5.6% of total budget
  10. Transit Department                                            4.8% of total budget 

TOP 10 DEPARTMENTS BY PERECENTAGE OF TOTAL BUDGET ALLOCATION IN 2027 ARE:

  1. Police Department:                                    19.5% of total budget
  2. Fire Department:                                          9.7% of total budget
  3. City Support Department:                           9.6% of total budget
  4. Human Resources Department:                 8.3% of total budget
  5. Healthcare, Housing, Homelessness:        6.9% of total budget
  6. Solid Waste Department:                             6.1% of total budget
  7. Aviation Department:                                   5.3% of total budget
  8. Finance/Admin Department:                       5.0% of total budget
  9. Arts & Cultural Services  Department       3.9%  of total budget
  10. Transit Department                                      3.8% of total budget

Spending on Health, Housing, and Homelessness is smaller as a percentage of budget in 2027 than it was at the end of the Mayor Richard Berry administration.

THE TOP 10 DEPARTMENTS WITH HIGHEST NET ANNUAL BUDGET DOLLAR  INCREASE FROM 2018 TO 2027 ARE:

  1. Police                                                + $108.8 million
  2. City Support / General Services     +   $89.7  million
  3. Fire                                                    +   $62.4 million
  4. Human Resources                           +   $58.8  million
  5. Health, Housing, Homelessness    +   $31.1 million
  6. Community Safety                           +   $21.0 million
  7. Parks & Recreation                         +   $19.8 million
  8. Aviation                                            +   $16.3 million
  9. Arts & Culture                                  +  $16.1 million
  10. 10.Solid Waste                                +   $13.7 million

Departments with highest Combined Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) from 2018 through 2027 ARE:

  • Civilian Police Oversight:         +15.4% CAGR ($2.2 million)
  • Chief Administrative Office:    +14.9% CAGR ($4.2 million)
  • Office of Inspector General:    +12.2% CAGR ($626 thousand)
  • City Council Services:             +11.7% CAGR ($6.6 million)
  • Office of City Clerk:                  + 9.1% CAGR ($2.7 million)
  • Human Resources:                   + 7.6% CAGR ($58.8 million)
  • Fire Department:                       + 6.6% CAGR ($62.4 million)
  • Technology & Innovation:        + 6.6% CAGR ($13.6 million)
  • Police Department:                   +5.5% CAGR ($108.8 million)
  • Parks & Recreation:                  + 5.0% CAGR  ($19.8 million)
  • Planning Department:              +5.0% CAGR ($8.5 million)
  • Legal Department:                    +5.0% CAGR   ($3 million)

City employee headcount from 2018 to 2027 increased by 961 or 16%.

Top 10 departments by personnel count in 2018 were:

  1. Police:                                               1,513
  2. Fire:                                                      711
  3. Transit:                                                 609
  4. Solid Waste:                                        468
  5. Municipal Development:                    438
  6. Arts & Cultural Services:                   352
  7. Parks & Recreation:                           294
  8. Aviation:                                              285
  9. Health Housing Homelessness:        282
  10. Planning:                                             175

                                                     TOTAL:  5,500

 The top 10 departments by personnel count in 2027:

  1. Police:                                               1,895
  2. Fire:                                                      828
  3. Solid Waste:                                        542
  4. Transit:                                                 488
  5. Arts & Cultural Services:                   407
  6. Parks & Recreation:                           334
  7. Aviation:                                              313
  8. Health Housing Homelessness:        311
  9. Municipal Development:                    277
  10. General Services:                               261

                                                  TOTAL:     6,914

SHANLY ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

While recognizing that we had pandemic impact from 2020 – 2021 and subsequent inflation, it remains challenging to reconcile the fact that the actual City of Albuquerque  spending from 2019 through 2026 has been $2.2 BILLION  more than it would have been if the annual spending growth had been held to the 0.71% level of 2010 thru 2018. 

The most impactful new addition has been the Albuquerque Community Safety Department (ACS)  for which the total cost to date has been $81.6 million. The much-touted Gateway System is generally considered to have consumed around $300 million of the $455 million one can extrapolate from the HHH (part of Family & Community Services  budget until 2025) but how do we quantify its impact when we still have thousands living unhoused on the street?

One thing is certain.  As a city we are spending serious money.   Lost in the woods of all this money and ambiguous metrics I find myself wondering if appropriate seriousness is being applied to direct that money toward solving our city’s most pressing problems with urgency.

Referenced data in spreadsheet and PDF printable pages can be found and are publicly available at: 

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1K1ejyJy4EUTsiW97NXCCXOVzDdr5yJbX?usp=share_link

RESPECTFULLY,

JAEMES SHANLY

THE UNHOUSED NUMBERS IN ALBUQUERQUE 

On November 17, 2025  the New Mexico Coalition to End Homelessness  released the  most recent 2025 Point-In-Time (PIT) Report for the numbers of unhoused in Albuquerque. The PIT survey  found that at least 2,960 people in Albuquerque called the streets or an emergency shelter their home with nowhere else to go. Of that number, 1,367 people were completely unsheltered with no roof over their heads, living on the streets or in emergency shelters. The 2025 PIT report revealed an 8% increase in homelessness going from 2,740 in 2024 to 2,960 in 2025, an increase of 220 people.

A 2025 report by the city found 30% of individuals experiencing homelessness self report having a serious mental illness25% self report having a substance use disorder and upwards of  66% experience some form of mental health condition. A report by the New Mexico Justice Reinvestment Working Group found that 65% of individuals who enter the state’s criminal justice system have behavioral health needs and the criminal justice system cannot provide necessary medical  treatment and facilities. A major  problem is that approximately 75%  to 80% of the chronic, emergency unhoused simply refuse city services, yet the city continues spending  millions a year to benefit  so few that need assistance.

DINELLI ANALYSIS AND COMMENTARY

In the last three years, the city has spent upwards of $300 million on homeless shelters, programs and purchasing and remodeling motels for low-income housing. In 2021, the city acquired the Lovelace Hospital complex on Gibson for $15 million and then spent upwards of $90 million to remodel it into the Gateway shelter.

Mayor Keller’s  approved FY/26 General Fund budget by the City Council for Health, Housing and Homeless Department (HHH) totals $52.6 million, an increase of $1.4 million, or 2.7% above the FY/25 original budget.  The FY/26 approved budget lists  116  separate contracts for services benefiting directly or indirectly to the unhoused totals $53,901,355. The 116 separate contracts totaling $53,901,355  include:

  • 32 for Affordable Housing Contracts totaling                    $30,391,436
  • 12 for Emergency Shelter contracts totaling                     $  6,347,819
  • 16 for Health and Human Services Contracts totaling      $  1,962,486
  • 28 for Homeless Support Services contracts totaling        $  5,746,188
  • 11 for Mental Health Contracts totaling                             $   2,995.400
  • 12  for Substance Abuse contracts totaling                       $   2,573,526
  •    5  for Gateway Shelter operating contracts totaling       $   3,884,500

116  SERVICE CONTRACTS         TOTAL CONTRACTS      $   53,901,355

The link to review the approved  FY/26 budget for the HHH department, page 209, is here:

Mayor Tim Keller’s approved  FY/27 General Fund budget submitted to the City Council for the Health, Housing and Homeless Department is  $48.9 million and it is an increase of 9.5% or $4.3 million above the FY/26 original budget with 98 full time employees.  However, listed in the HHH proposed FY/27 budget are 122 separate contracts for services directly or indirectly to the unhoused totaling $85,283,474. The 122 separate service contracts totaling $85,283,47 include:

  • 34 for Affordable Housing Contracts totaling                  $35,534,228
  • 13 for Emergency Shelter contracts totaling                   $10,230,537
  • 14 forHealth and Human Services Contracts totaling     $  2,418,638
  • 23  for Homeless Support Services contracts totaling    $  6,091,714
  • 11 for Mental Health Contracts totaling                           $  3,925,400
  • 12  for Substance Abuse contracts totaling                     $  5,530,478
  • 15 for Gateway Shelter operating contracts totaling        $21,552,479

 122 SERVICE CONTRACTS              TOTAL CONTRACTS  $85,283,471

The link to review the proposed FY/27 budget for the HHH department, page 124, is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/dfa/documents/fy27-proposed-budget-with-weblink-final-4-01-2026.pdf

Being unhoused or being destitute are not crimes. Government, be it federal or local, have a moral obligation to help and assist the unhoused, especially those that are mentally ill or who are drug addicted. The city under Mayor Keller has spent upwards of $300 million to help the unhoused over the last  3 years.

The City of Albuquerque is spending upwards of $53 million (approved FY/26 budget) to $85 million (proposed FY/27 budget) a year on homeless services with 116 to 122  service provider contracts including for 5  Gateway Emergency shelters, subsidized housing, food and medical care and drug counseling.

Notwithstanding all the money spent, surveys have revealed that  between 75% to 80% of the chronically unhoused refuse or decline city shelter, housing, services and financial help offered or simply say they are not satisfied with what is being offered by the city.

It’s become obvious that Mayor Keller’s programs of shelters and the astonishing funding levels for so few are not working and its an unsustainable black hole. Mayor Keller and the City Council need to find  a better approach to the unhoused crisis to get them off the streets.

___________________________________

POSTSCRIPT

On May 18, 2026 the Albuquerque City Council voted to approve the City’s Fiscal Year 2027 budget with  the passage of R-26-17, which appropriated $1.5 billion for operating the City Of Albuquerque for Fiscal Year 2027. The link to the related article on adoption of the FY/27 budget is here:

ABQ. City Council Passes Amended $1.47 Billion Budget After Skirmish With Mayor Keller Over $11.8 Million Discrepancy; Council Enacts One Year Objectives Resolution; Mayor Approves Budget Without Signing And No Line Item Vetos

Albuquerque’s record $1.5 billion budget heads to the state, without Keller’s signature