About Pete Dinelli

Pete Dinelli was born and raised in Albuquerque, New Mexico. He is of Italian and Hispanic descent. He is a 1970 graduate of Del Norte High School, a 1974 graduate of Eastern New Mexico University with a Bachelor's Degree in Business Administration and a 1977 graduate of St. Mary's School of Law, San Antonio, Texas. Pete has a 40 year history of community involvement and service as an elected and appointed official and as a practicing attorney in Albuquerque. Pete and his wife Betty Case Dinelli have been married since 1984 and they have two adult sons, Mark, who is an attorney and George, who is an Emergency Medical Technician (EMT). Pete has been a licensed New Mexico attorney since 1978. Pete has over 27 years of municipal and state government service. Pete’s service to Albuquerque has been extensive. He has been an elected Albuquerque City Councilor, serving as Vice President. He has served as a Worker’s Compensation Judge with Statewide jurisdiction. Pete has been a prosecutor for 15 years and has served as a Bernalillo County Chief Deputy District Attorney, as an Assistant Attorney General and Assistant District Attorney and as a Deputy City Attorney. For eight years, Pete was employed with the City of Albuquerque both as a Deputy City Attorney and Chief Public Safety Officer overseeing the city departments of police, fire, 911 emergency call center and the emergency operations center. While with the City of Albuquerque Legal Department, Pete served as Director of the Safe City Strike Force and Interim Director of the 911 Emergency Operations Center. Pete’s community involvement includes being a past President of the Albuquerque Kiwanis Club, past President of the Our Lady of Fatima School Board, and Board of Directors of the Albuquerque Museum Foundation.

Our Corona Virus “War Time President” Has Created His Own “Fog of War”; Trump Is A Cancer On Our Body Politic That Must Be Removed On November 3.

The term “fog of war” has been defined by various sources as “the uncertainty in situational awareness experienced by participants in military operations. The term seeks to capture the uncertainty regarding one’s own capability, adversary capability, and adversary intent during an engagement, operation, or campaign. Military forces try to reduce the fog of war through military intelligence and friendly force tracking systems.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fog_of_war

The “Fog of War” is also a 2003 academy award winning documentary about former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara and the role he played in perpetrating lies and deceit to the American people during the Kennedy-Johnson presidential years, especially during the Cuban Missile crisis and the Viet Nam War.

https://slate.com/culture/2003/12/the-lies-of-the-fog-of-war.html

OUR CORONA VIRUS WARTIME PRESIDENT

It comes as no surprise that President Donald Trump is declaring himself a “wartime president”. His appointed Surgeon General is now saying “This is going to be our Pearl Harbor moment, our 9/11 moment”. Trump knows full well that the wartime references will give him a bump in popularity for his re election bid. Its called “rally round the flag” effect.

The rally ’round the flag effect is a concept used in political science and international relations to explain increased short-run popular support for a President of the United States during periods of major crisis or war that threatens the United States. The rally ’round the flag” effect can reduce criticism of governmental policies.

In times of major crisis, usually in time of war and national threat, the American public usually views a President as the embodiment of national unity, and the president’s popularity goes up but it does not last. The best example is the 9-11 World Trade Center attack where President George W. Bushes popularity soared to over 90% but he left office with approval ratings in the 30’s after his second term.

ASSOCIATED PRESS REPORT

On April 11, the Associated Press published the following article, which is followed by the link to the article, that outlines the major unmet promises of President Trump’s handling of corona virus pandemic. The article refers to those promises as the “fog of promises” which can also be called Trump’s “fog of war.” Following is the article and link:

HEADLINE: Trump leaves trail of unmet promises in coronavirus response
by: CALVIN WOODWARD, Associated Press

Posted: Apr 11, 2020 / 06:39 AM MDT / Updated: Apr 11, 2020 / 07:39 AM MDT
For several months, President Donald Trump and his officials have cast a fog of promises meant to reassure a country in the throes of the coronavirus pandemic. Trump and his team haven’t delivered on critical ones.

They talk numbers. Bewildering numbers about masks on the way. About tests being taken. About ships sailing to the rescue, breathing machines being built and shipped, field hospitals popping up, aircraft laden with supplies from abroad, dollars flowing to crippled businesses.

Piercing that fog is the bottom-line reality that Americans are going without the medical supplies and much of the financial help they most need from the government at the very time they need it most — and were told they would have it.

The U.S. now is at or near the height of COVID-19 sickness and death, experts believe.

There’s no question that on major fronts — masks, gowns, diagnostic tests, ventilators and more —- the federal government is pushing hard now to get up to speed. Impressive numbers are being floated for equipment and testing procedures in the pipeline.

But in large measure they will arrive on the down slope of the pandemic, putting the U.S. in a better position should the same virus strike again but landing too late for this outbreak’s lethal curve.

Concerning ventilators, for example, Trump recently allowed: “A lot of them will be coming at a time when we won’t need them as badly.”

Two weeks ago, Trump brought word of an innovative diagnostic test that can produce results in minutes instead of days or a week. The U.S. testing system, key to containing the spread of infection, has been a failure in the crunch, as public health authorities (but never Trump) acknowledged in March. The rapid test could help change that.

Like other glimmers of hope that may or may not come to something, Trump held out these tests as a “whole new ballgame.” The new machines and testing cartridges are being sent across the country, and may well hold promise. But they are not ready for actual use in large numbers.

New Hampshire, for one, received 15 rapid-test machines but 120 cartridges instead of the 1,500 expected. Only two machines can be used. “I’m banging my head against the wall, I really am,” Republican Gov. Chris Sununu said Wednesday. “We’re going to keep pushing on Washington multiple times a day to get what we need.”

False starts and dead ends are inevitable in any crisis, especially one driven by a virus never seen before. By its nature, a crisis means we’re not on top of it. Desperation is the mother of invention here and officials worldwide are winging it, many more successfully than in the U.S.\

But bold promises and florid assurances were made, day after day, from the White House and a zigzagging president who minimized the danger for months and systematically exaggerates what Washington is doing about it.

“We’re getting them tremendous amounts of supplies,” he said of health care workers. “Incredible. It’s a beautiful thing to watch.” This was when Americans were watching something else entirely — doctors wearing garbage bags for makeshift protection.

MASKS, GLOVES, GOWNS

In hospitals, masks, gloves and other protective garb come with the territory. But doctors, nurses, flight attendants and other front-line workers have had to go begging for such basics, even before public health leaders flipped and recommended facial coverings for everyone outside the home.

The mere scale of the pandemic stretched supplies even in better prepared countries. Yet the enduring shortages in the U.S. are not just from a lack of foresight, but also from hesitancy as the pandemic started to sicken and kill Americans.

It was not until mid-March, when some hospitals were already treating thousands of infected patients without enough equipment and pleading for help, that the government placed bulk orders for N95 masks and other basic necessities of medical care for its stockpile, The Associated Press reported. Washington dithered on supplies for two months after global alarm bells rang about a coming pandemic in January.

And the Strategic National Stockpile, it turns out, is not the supply fortress you might have thought from its formidable name.

It maxed out days ago, before the pandemic’s peak in the U.S., and never filled its purpose of plugging the most essential and immediate gaps in supplies, though it helped. This past week officials said the stockpile was 90% depleted of its protective equipment, with the remainder to be held back for federal employees only.

Some shipments to states were deficient. The wrong masks were sent to Illinois in a load of 300,000. Michigan got only half of the number that was supposed to be in a shipment of 450,000. When he was trying to get 10,000 ventilators in late March, Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom of California said he received 170 broken ones from the national stockpile as well as good ones.

When officials in Alabama opened a shipment of medical masks from the stockpile, they found more than 5,000 with rot. They had expired in 2010, officials in the state said, yet been left in place first by the Obama administration and then the Trump administration.

When it became clear that critical shortages weren’t being solved, the self-styled “wartime president,” who had gone to Norfolk, Virginia, to send off the USS Comfort Navy hospital ship to New York City, blamed the states and declared the federal government isn’t a “shipping clerk.”

TESTS

“Anybody that needs a test, gets a test,” Trump said on March 6. “They have the tests. And the tests are beautiful.” He said the same day: “Anybody that wants a test can get a test.”

Whether it’s a case of needing a test or only wanting one, his assurance was not true then, it’s not true now and it won’t be true any time soon.

The greatly expanding but still vastly insufficient capacity to test people is steered mostly to those who are already sick or to essential workers at the most risk of exposure.

If you’re sick with presumed COVID-19 but riding it out at home, chances are you haven’t been tested. If you worry that you’ve been exposed and might be carrying and spreading the virus but so far feel fine, you’re generally off the radar as well.

Trump tries to assure people who need to fly that passengers are tested getting on and off flights. He is wrong. Instead, some major airports do screenings, which means asking passengers questions and checking their temperature, not swabbing their nasal passages to find out for sure.

Many people with the virus will never get sick from it. Others who have it will get sick eventually. Both groups are contagious. But there is no capacity in the days of greatest danger to test apparently healthy people in large numbers, so precautionary distancing remains the best defense, like in ancient times.

Within three weeks of China’s New Year’s Eve notification to global health authorities about a mysterious cluster of pneumonia cases, China had sequenced the genetic makeup of the virus, German scientists had developed a test for detecting it and the World Health Organization had adopted the test and was moving toward global distribution.

Ten days behind, officials at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention bypassed the WHO test and sponsored their own, which was flawed out of the gate. Trump said the WHO test was flawed, but it wasn’t.

Precious time was lost as the U.S. test was corrected, distributed narrowly, then more broadly but still not up to par with the countries most on top of the crisis. Testing most lagged during the critical month of February as the virus took root in the U.S. population.

Germany, in contrast, raced ahead with aggressive testing of a broad segment of the population when it had fewer than 10 cases in January. It has experienced far fewer deaths proportionally than the United States.

“There were many, many opportunities not to end up where we are,” Dr. Ashish K. Jha, director of the Global Health Institute at Harvard, told AP.

Trump told Americans on March 13 that a division of Google’s parent company was coming out with a website that would let people determine online if they should get a test and, if so, swing by a nearby place to get one, a notable shortcut in theory. But a game-changer in practice?

“It’s going to be very quickly done,” he said. The website is up but operational in just four California counties. Drive-through sites that he promised would expedite testing were plagued with shortages and delays in state after state, such that many people with symptoms and a doctor’s order were turned away.

VENTILATORS

Trump dusted off the Defense Production Act, empowering him to order manufacturers and shippers to make and deliver what the country needs in the crisis. His move raised expectations that a new wave of emergency supplies generally and ventilators in particular could come to the aid of patients and the people looking after them. He and his advisers inflated those hopes.

Under the president’s “vigorous, swift” order to General Motors, said Peter Navarro, White House point man on the emergency supply chain, new ventilators would be ready in “Trump time, which is to say as fast as possible.”

Yet Trump has held off on using his full powers under the act to command production from private companies. A presidential directive to GM on ventilator manufacturing essentially told the company to do what it was already doing.

While most people get better from COVID-19 without needing medical care, the sickest cannot breathe without a ventilator bridging them to recovery. The ventilator shortfall has been the most frightening deficiency as more people get infected and die by the hour. In the current chaos, the size of the shortfall nationally is not known.

In the absence of what they regard as dependable federal leadership, several states formed a supply consortium to coordinate purchases and boost their buying power. The federal government has pitched in with states and private companies to spur supplies, though not exactly in an atmosphere of trust.

Governors accuse Washington of shortchanging states on machines. Washington accuses some of them of trying to build an unreasonable cushion that deprives other, more desperate states.

According to the scientific model most favored by federal authorities, the country probably needs nearly 17,000 ventilators to be operating for COVID-19 patients alone at the pandemic’s peak, right about now, a figure that exceeds 35,000 under a worst-case scenario.

“We have over 100,000 being built right now or soon to be started,” Trump said a week ago. He acknowledged they won’t come in time.

WHERE’S THE MONEY?

“This will deliver urgently needed relief,” Trump said in signing an economic rescue package into law. The need may be urgent but the delivery hasn’t been.

More than two weeks later, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said with some exaggeration, but not much, that “no money has gone out the door yet.”

Because of the bureaucracy.

Because of website glitches.

Because of confusion among lenders with the money to farm out and among those who need it to keep their businesses afloat.

So much for Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin’s prediction that loans could be turned around and money transferred to businesses’ bank accounts the same day applications were received.

Yet because of the flood of pending loans, Congress is already having to find more money for subsidies to help businesses cover payroll. Only a tiny fraction of loans has been released.

Meantime state officials are slammed as they try to administer jobless benefits that Washington expanded and is paying for but having states try to manage.
Frustration with the virus package is going viral.

In Portland, Maine, a furloughed orthopedic medical assistant, Margaret Heath Carignan, called the unemployment office on a day set aside for people with surnames starting with A through H. And called and called. Altogether, she said, 291 times before she gave up.

https://www.krqe.com/news/politics/trump-and-his-trail-of-unmet-promises-in-coronavirus-fight/

TRUMP PROCLAIMS HE HAS ULTIMATE AUTHORITY OVER STATES AND GOVERNORS

President Trump is now looking at reopening the economy by May 1, creating yet another crisis putting him on a collision course with state leaders who are pushing back.

On April 13, President Trump said the decision to reopen the country’s ailing economy ultimately rests with him, not state leaders there by escalating his feud with governors over when to allow Americans to return to work. In two tweets, Trump claimed he had the ultimate authority to loosen coronavirus outbreak measures as governors pushed ahead with their own plans for reopening their states, in some cases a coalition of governors looking at regions.

In his first tweet, Trump wrote:

“For the purpose of creating conflict and confusion, some in the Fake News Media are saying that it is the Governors decision to open up the states, not that of the President of the United States & the Federal Government. Let it be fully understood that this is incorrect”.

In the second tweet, Trump wrote:

“It is the decision of the President, and for many good reasons. With that being said, the Administration and I are working closely with the Governors, and this will continue. A decision by me, in conjunction with the Governors and input from others, will be made shortly!”.

The two tweets were in total contradiction to previous comments Trump had made the previous week when he said he didn’t want to overrule governors on matters regarding closures and coronavirus strictures, even though he would be within his right to under the constitution, and said:

“I like to allow governors to make decisions without overruling them, because from a constitutional standpoint, that’s the way it should be done. … “If I disagreed, I would overrule a governor, and I have that right to do it … I would rather have them make their decisions.”

The truth is that President Trump does not have any authority to overrule the governors nor order them to reverse the closure and reopen the economy. The United States Constitution does not give the President the auhority Trump claims he has and neither has the congress.

During his April 14 news conference on the corona virus updates, Trump said this:

“When somebody is the president of the United States, the authority is total and that’s the way it’s got to be. … It’s total. The governors know that. … [They] can’t do anything without the approval of the president of the United States.”

WITHHOLDING FUNDING TO WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION

On April 2, 2020, Trump had this to say about travel restrictions to China:

“I cut off China very early. And if I didn’t, we would have a chart that you wouldn’t believe. So how would I know to do that? How would I know to cut off Europe? I cut off Europe very early. I mean, you have to make a decision. People knew that some bad things were going on, and they got off to a late start. And some others got off to a late start also. But we cut off China. If we didn’t cut off China, we would have been in some big trouble. And we cut it off.”

Trump has repeatedly patted himself on the back for announcing travel restrictions on China as the novel coronavirus emerged in January. Before the caseload in the United States exploded, Trump attributed what he considered a small number of cases to that decision. Even as deaths from covid-19 in the United States started to soar, he said he saved lives by imposing what he calls a “ban” on China and said on March 25:

“We’re the ones that gave the great response, and we’re the ones that kept China out of here. … And if I didn’t do it, you’d have thousands and thousands of people died — who would’ve died — that are now living and happy.”

The truth is that the World Health Organization cautioned against such travel restrictions, saying they are ineffective against a virus and in the long run counterproductive. Trump, according to news reports, was initially skeptical and worried about provoking China after signing a major trade deal. But his national security and public health experts convinced him that the move would buy time to put in place effective prevention and testing measures.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/04/07/trumps-claim-that-he-imposed-first-china-ban/

On April 14, President Donald Trump order the suspension of funding to the World Health Organization while it reviews the agency’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic,. Trump said the international health agency made mistakes that “caused so much death” as the coronavirus spread across the globe. At a press conference Trump said:

“Today I’m instructing my administration to halt funding of the World Health Organization while a review is conducted to assess the World Health Organization’s role in severely mismanaging and covering up the spread of the coronavirus”.

Trump criticized the international agency’s response to the outbreak, saying “one of the most dangerous and costly decisions from the WHO was its disastrous decision to oppose travel restrictions from China and other nations” that Trump imposed early on in the outbreak. … Fortunately, I was not convinced and suspended travel from China saving untold numbers of lives.”

https://www.cnbc.com/2020/04/14/trump-calls-for-halt-to-us-funding-for-world-health-organization-amid-coronavirus-outbreak.html

What Trump did not disclose is all of his own efforts to down play the pandemic, refusing to believe what he was being told in January. Now he is taking credit for saving lives in an effort to find blame on the World Health Organization.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Trump has an uncanny ability to make things worse with his daily tweeting and self-absorbed, self-center arrogance. His recent false proclamation that the decision to reopen the country’s ailing economy ultimately rests with him, not the governors is the best example of how delusional he is. After over 3 years of constant daily news coverage and twitters from Trump creating crisis, after crisis, after crisis of his own making, even bringing the country close to nuclear war with North Korea, the United States is now faced with a major pandemic revealing a man who is totally unfit, incompetent and totally unprepared to be President.

Trump can no longer have his political rallies to gin up his base because of the pandemic. Trump has now taken to daily news briefings and updates and taking benevolent credit for the help and assistance being given the states, except when things go wrong. Trump refuses to accept the fact that he does not know what he is talking about. Trump consistently contradicts his medical advisors and lies to the public with what is going on. He also lashes out against his critics and the news media during his daily briefings. Trump is now proclaiming that only he can re open the economy and that the Governors cannot which is absurd and simply not at all true.

Trump supporters look upon him as the messiah that is cult like. As the crisis continues, the odds are high that he will only complicate the crisis, making things MUCH worse and create another crisis within a crisis. More people will likely die because of his mishandling of it. Trump will make things worse because he just cannot help it. Our Bone Spur Commander in Chief thinks he is in a war and not a worldwide heath crisis. President Trump is now creating his own “fog of war” which is increasing casualties’ way beyond comprehension as well as destroying the economy in the process.

One thing is certain. Trump is a cancer on our body politic that must be removed, the sooner the better, or the patient will die like so many have died in the pandemic.

Sanders Endorses Biden; Trump’s Popularity Spike Short Lived; Biden Beats Trump In National Polls; The Trump Version Of “Midas Touch” Turns Things To Crap;

SANDERS ENDORSES BIDEN

On Monday, April 13, Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders endorsed former Vice President Joe Biden for president in no uncertain terms saying:

“We need you in the White House. I will do all that I can to see that that happens, Joe.”

Sanders pledge to Biden to help him defeat President Donald Trump in the general election as they agreed to launch a series of task forces to work jointly on policy matters. The endorsement marks a critical moment for Biden as he seeks to unify and turn his focus toward President Donald Trump. Prior to the endorsement, Biden was reaching out to Sanders supporters telling them he needed them.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/13/politics/bernie-sanders-endorses-joe-biden/index.html

Sanders’ quick endorsement of Biden in mid-April, a mere 5 days after he suspended his own campaign, was a stark contrast to the 2016 Democratic race. In 2016, after a brutal primary, Sanders refused to drop out all the way to the convention demanding major concessions from the Democratic Party that he has never been a member of until he runs for President.

After Clinton secured the nomination, Sanders finally endorsed Clinton and held events for her. But the Clinton campaign felt Sanders showed lukewarm support for her. Sanders was not as helpful as he could have been in getting the message out when and where they needed it to defeat Trump. Nationwide, one poll found that more than 1 in 10 people who voted for Sanders in the 2016 primary against Hillary Clinton ended up supporting Trump in the general election.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/sanders-voters-helped-trump-win-white-house-could-they-do-n1145306

A mid-March, 2020 poll in Michigan, one of the 5 battleground states that will decide the election, found just 2 of 5 Sanders backers said they would vote Democratic in November, regardless of who became the nominee. Four in five said they’d be dissatisfied with Biden as the Democratic standard-bearer.

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/03/13/democrats-confront-a-never-biden-contingent-127438

COMMENTARY

There is no doubt that Joe Biden needs the Sanders staunches supporters. It would be damn foolish for him to ignore Sanders supporters. There are 4 big differences that exist now than 4 years ago:

First: Hillary Clinton was viewed as seriously flawed and as a “Corporate Democrat” by the progressives while Biden was very successful as Obama’s Vice President.

Second: It is now very clear from the Mueller Report that Trump was put in office because of Russian interference with our elections and its happening again.

Third: Trump has now been in office for over 3 years, he has shown he is not fit to be President and his racism has become more pronounced.

Fourth: Trump has done more damage to the country than anyone could have possibly imagined. The middle class is shrinking while Trump’s tax cuts for the rich are paid for on the backs of the middle class.

For Sander’s supporters to support or again vote for Trump, or even worse, and not vote at all, would be a betrayal of much if not all what Sanders stands for and the issues he campaigned for and what he wants to accomplish.

NATIONAL POLLS RELEASED

Many still believe that Vice President Joe Biden can not beat Trump in a one to one race. But that was also the same for Bernie Sanders. Recent polls are showing that the race is indeed competitive and the Orange Cheeto is now imploding.

According to 3 national polls release last week, President Donald Trump’s job approval has taken a major hit as a growing number of Americans harbor doubts about his handling of the corona virus crisis.

Congress has not faired that well either. The 3 polls taken by Quinnipiac University Polling, Reuters/Ipsos Core Political Polling and CNN taken in April now show a difference than the Gallup poll taken in March.

MARCH GALLUP POLL

On March 24, a Gallup poll found that 6 in 10 Americans approve of the job Donald Trump was doing to combat the coronavirus crisis, pushing the president’s approval rating to 49%, the highest of his presidency. According to the March Gallup poll, voters were largely giving Trump positive marks for his handling of the pandemic, with 94% of Republicans, 60% of independents, and 27% of Democrats approving of his efforts. That’s higher than his general approval rating among each group. The Gallup poll was conducted from March 13 through March 22 and has a margin of error of plus or minus 4%.

https://news.gallup.com/poll/298313/president-trump-job-approval-rating.aspx

After the late March spike in Trump’s popularity as the pandemic ravaged the United States, his approval ratings have now fallen back to the mid-40% range, where they were before the huge spikes in cases, deaths and unemployment. As of April 9, there are now 16,000 dead as of April 9, jobless claims across the country with 17 million out of work and with 454,000 confirmed cases of the virus.

QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY POLLING

“As the number of coronavirus cases spreads throughout the country, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, earns the highest approval rating for his handling of the response to the coronavirus … He is closely followed by state governors, but President Trump and Congress don’t fare quite as well on their handling of the response to the coronavirus:

Dr. Anthony Fauci: 78% approve, 7% disapprove;
“Your state’s governor”: 74%approve, 24% disapprove;
New York Governor Andrew Cuomo: 59% approve, 17% disapprove;
President Trump: 46% approve, 51% disapprove;
Congress: 44% approve, 46% disapprove.

When it comes to President Trump’s response to the coronavirus, 55% of registered voters say that he has not acted aggressively enough, while 41% say his response has been about right and 2% say he’s been too aggressive.

“In a country gripped by crisis and divided by partisanship, public opinion is united when it comes to Dr. Anthony Fauci. Nearly 8 in 10 voters give him a resounding thumbs up for the job he’s doing responding to the COVID-19 pandemic. That’s not the case for President Trump. More voters disapprove of his response than approve. Separately, they say he hasn’t acted aggressively enough in his response, … ”

A plurality of voters gives the president a failing grade on the way he has communicated information about the coronavirus to the American people:

25% give Trump an A;
17% give him a B;
14% give him a C;
12% give him a D;
31% give him an F.

More than 8 out of 10 registered voters, 85%, say they are either very (50%) or somewhat (35%) concerned they or someone they know will be infected with the coronavirus, a spike of 31%.

Three-quarters of voters say they are either very concerned (39%) or somewhat concerned (36%) that they or someone in their family will need to be hospitalized because of the coronavirus.

QUINNIPIAC UNIVERSITY 2020 PRESIDENTIAL POLL RESULTS

In a head to head matchup between President Trump and former Vice President Joe Biden, Biden beats Trump 49 – 41%.
Republicans go to Trump 91 – 7%, while Democrats go to Biden 91 – 4% and independents favor Biden 44 – 35%.

https://poll.qu.edu/images/polling/us/us04082020_uksb19.pdf

REUTERS/IPSOS CORE POLITICAL POLL

Following are some of the findings of an Ipsos poll conducted between April 6-7, 2020 on behalf of Thomson Reuters:

The April 8, 2020 Reuters/Ipsos Core Political revealed Americans are increasingly adjusting their lives around the coronavirus/COVID-19 pandemic, fewer Americans think that the country is headed in the right direction, and approval on the president’s handling of the pandemic has decreased. Healthcare and the economy continue to be the issues that concern Americans the most.

According to the poll, President Trump’s approval rating has dipped back after a brief bounce. President Trump’s approval rating has returned to 40% among all Americans. Trump’s approval rating continues to fall along party lines. President Trump holds the approval of 86% of Republican registered voters, and just 9% of Democratic registered voters.

American approval of the president on his handling of COVID-19 has dropped six points from last week (48%) to 42%.

For this survey, a sample of 1,116 Americans age 18+ from the continental U.S., Alaska, and Hawaii were interviewed online in English. The sample includes 989 registered voters, 480 Democratic registered voters, 376 Republican registered voters, and 73 independent registered voters.”

CNN POLL

CNN commissioned telephone by SSRS, an independent research company. Interviews were conducted from April 3-6, 2020 among a sample of 1,002 respondents. The landline total respondents were 350 and there were 652 cell phone respondents.

The CNN two polls and the poll questions and results are as follows:

Do you approve or disapprove of the way Donald Trump is handling his job as president?
Poll period April 3-6, 2020:

44% Approve,
51% Disapprove,
5% No opinion

Poll Period March 4-7, 2020:

43% Approve,
53% Disapprove,
4% No opinion

Do you think the federal government has done a good job or a poor job of preventing the spread of novel coronavirus, sometimes referred to as COVID-19, in the U.S.?
Poll conducted from April 3-6, 2020:
41% GOOD JOB
55% POOR JOB
4% NO OPINION

Poll Conducted from March 24-29, 2020:
48% GOOD JOB
47% POOR JOB
5% NO OPINION

Which comes closer to your view about where the U.S. stands in the coronavirus outbreak:
Poll conducted April 3-6, 2020
The worst is behind us: 17%
The worst is yet to come: 80%
No opinion: 3%

REAL CLEAR POLITICS POLL AGGREGATE

Founded in 2000, RealClearPolitics (RCP) is a Chicago based political news and polling data aggregator. It compiles polling data history from as many sources available and then projects plus or minus trends in the polling data. On March 23, Real Clear Politics posted the following:

“Since Super Tuesday, four general election trial heat polls have been released that break down the results by age. Biden, who beats Trump in all four surveys, is the leader among young voters in all of them, usually by blowout margins.

CNN has Biden winning the under-35 vote over Donald Trump, 64% to 33%. For Quinnipiac, it’s 59% to 30%. YouGov and Emerson published data for the under-30 vote. For YouGov, Biden was up 55% to 23%, and in Emerson, it’s 56% to 44%.

How does that compare to the last two presidential elections? Regarding Hillary Clinton’s performance, Biden does generally better. In the 2016 exit poll, she beat Trump 55% to 36% among under-30 voters, and 51% to 41% among voters in their thirties.

When you look at the CNN and Quinnipiac numbers, Biden also appears to be meeting Barack Obama’s 2012 standard—among voters under 30, he beat Mitt Romney 60% to 37%. And even if he’s a little behind Obama’s pace with young voters in the YouGov and Emerson polls, Biden is outperforming Obama with the senior citizen vote. Obama lost the 65-and-over vote by 12 percentage points, while Biden wins with seniors in every March poll except Emerson. And in that one, he only loses by four. In other words, Biden has broader generational appeal than Obama.”

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2020/03/23/think_joe_biden_has_a_young_voter_problem_think_again_142733.html

RALLY ROUND THE FLAG

President Donald Trump took to declaring himself a “wartime president”. His appointed Surgeon General also said “This is going to be our Pearl Harbor moment, our 9/11 moment”. Trump knew full well that the wartime references would give him a bump in popularity for his reelection bid. It’s called “rally round the flag” effect.

The rally ’round the flag effect is a concept used in political science and international relations to explain increased short-run popular support for a President of the United States during periods of major crisis or war that threatens the United States. The rally ’round the flag” effect can reduce criticism of governmental policies. It is a political science theory that political scientist John Mueller suggested in 1970 in his a landmark paper called “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson”.

In times of major crisis, usually in time of war and national threat, the American public usually views a President as the embodiment of national unity, an the president’s popularity goes up and it does not last.

The biggest problem with the “Rally Round The Flag” poll is short term as the crisis subsides. The best example is 9-11 where President George W. Bushes popularity soared to over 90% and he left office with approval ratings in the 30’s.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

It comes as no surprise to political pundits that Trump’s job approval ratings are on the decline. The 49% approval rating Trump had in March is probably the highest it is going to be as the corona virus crisis continues and the economy goes into a recession or even a depression. Before the pandemic, Trump was relying upon the booming economy to give him a certain reelection victory. The disastrous way Mr. Trump and his administration have been handling the crisis is no doubt a major reason his popularity is going go down and voters are seeing what he is: a pathological liar and totally inept.

Trump’s staunches supporters will no doubt say all the polls were wrong last time, they are wrong now, and that Trump will win again. What the Trump supporters seem to ignore is that Trump must now run on his record of broken promises, irrational behavior and bullying voters will not cut it. Burning down the country is no way to govern.

After over 3 years of constant daily news coverage and twitters from Trump creating crisis, after crisis, after crisis of his own making, even bringing the country close to nuclear war with North Korea, the United States is now faced with a major pandemic revealing a man who is totally incompetent and totally unprepared to be President. The pandemic just may throw this country into a great depression, yet his Republican supporters insist on giving Trump high marks for handling the crisis in all the polls. Sooner rather than later, those Republicans who have lost their jobs or a loved one to the pandemic will come to the realization that the approach Trump wanted to take was to let the disease just “wash over the country” which is what he said early on in the “Situation Room” of the White House.

Trump has an uncanny ability to make things worse with his daily tweeting and self-absorbed, self-center arrogance. Trump has turned his daily news briefings on the virus and what is being done into an airing of grievances and attacking the press instead of useful updates on the public health crisis. He is using the daily briefing as a substitute for his rally’s that he cannot have because of the pandemic.

His supporters look upon him as the messiah that is cult like. As the pandemic worsens, which is most assured, the odds are high that he will only complicate the crisis, making things MUCH worse and create another crisis within a crisis. More people will die because of his mishandling of it.

Trump will make things worse because he just cannot help it. Our Bone Spur Commander in Chief has a version of the “Midas Touch” except that everything he touches turns to crap.

Governor Michelle Lujan Suggested Among Those Biden Should Select As Vice Presidential Running Mate; Lujan Grisham Needed Here; Michelle Obama Would Unite Democratic Party

Vice President Joe Biden faces the most important decision of his political career: choosing a vice president. Biden has already committed to picking a woman. A big part of what makes the selection so important is that Biden is 77 years old, will turn 78 soon after if elected, and if he wins, he would be the oldest American president in history. After a first term, he will be 82 and after a second term 86.

Biden’s Vice-Presidential decision will also be made with the backdrop of the corona virus pandemic. In addition to the death toll, the pandemic is having a devasting effect on the world economy. The corona virus pandemic recovery will no doubt shape the Biden administration as much as the pandemic has defined the Trump Administration as being incompetent and revealing Trump as man unfit to be President.

Biden will need a Vice President that must have immediate credibility and who can help in crisis recovery. He will need someone he can rely on and who is dependable under pressure, in time of crisis, and who is more concerned about the good of the country and not the pulse of the President. Biden is also facing pressure on multiple fronts. The Democratic Party is far more diverse racially, ethnically and ideologically than the Republican Party could ever hope to be and has become the Trump Party

https://apnews.com/8ee97c620963e17b6833068dfe184694

Biden is under pressure to select an African American running mate, especially a black woman. According to the polls, it was African American women who propelled his nomination after he lost the first 3 primaries to Bernie Sanders and he recovered with his win in South Carolina. After South Carolina, Biden won virtually every primary and now has an insurmountable lead that compelled Bernie Sanders to finally withdraw from the race.

NAMES BEING CIRCULATED

On April 8, the Washington Post published an article written by columnist Aaron Blake where he identifies and ranks those women who make the most sense to be Joe Biden’s running mate for Vice President. Follow is an extensively edited version of the list, with additions and changes made in the rankings and with the link to the story:

11. Stacey Abrams: Stacey Abrams is a former Georgia State Representative. Abrams in 2018 ran an exceptionally strong campaign for Georgia Governor. Soon after her loss, she played down thoughts of her running for President and instead said she would consider being the Vice-Presidential nominee. She has not served in any office beyond the state legislature, but she has popularity within the party. Biden may want to pick her in hopes of making a “purple state” a blue state” and making it Democratic. However, are far mor more-competitive battleground states in play.

10. Former United Nations Ambassador Susan E. Rice: She served on the National Security Council and in a high-ranking State Department role in the Clinton administration. She was United Nations ambassador and national security adviser in the Obama administration. She’s also an African American woman and has recently shown an interest in elective politics, and considered running against Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) this year. The one most obvious drawback here: She was in line to possibly become President Barack Obama’s secretary of state but withdrew after the Benghazi, Libya, attack threatened to make her confirmation “lengthy, disruptive and costly,” in her words. She came under sharp criticism for being misleading about the nature of that attack.

9. U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth: Senator Duckworth is from Illinois and a former member of the House. She is a Purple Heart recipient who lost both of her legs in Iraq conflict and was the first disabled woman elected to Congress. In 2018, she became the first senator to give birth while in office. She has a diverse background as the daughter of a Thai mother of Chinese descent.

8. U.S. Representative Val Demings: Although she has been in federal office for just a little more than three years, she served as one of the House Impeachment Managers that impeached President Trump. She is an African American and a former Police Chief of Orlando, Florida. In 2006 she was a much-hyped House candidate in the 2012 election and lost. She went on to run for mayor of Orange County, Fla., but dropped out in 2015.

7. U.S. Senator Catherine Cortez Masto: Senator Cortez Masto was elected to the Senate in 2016 and previously served as Nevada’s attorney general for two terms. The Democrats have the advantage of winning Nevada in that it has trended to the left in recent years. What is more important is that she is Hispanic, as is Michelle Lujan Grisham, and a female Hispanic will help Biden in the states of New Mexico, California, Texas and Arizona. The Hispanic population is generally concentrated in southern border states, led by New Mexico (49.1% Hispanic), Texas (39.6% Hispanic), California (39.3%) and Arizona (31.6%). In 2000, there were 10 states that had Hispanic populations of at least 10% of the total. The Hispanic vote could easily result in a win in any close race.

https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/slideshows/13-states-with-recent-hispanic-population-growth

6. N.M. Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham: Governor Lujan Grisham was elected New Mexico’s first Democratic Hispanic Governor in 2018. She’s among the relatively few Hispanic women who currently serve in high office in the United States, but is unknown nationally until recently because of her dealing with the pandemic (see below). Lujan Grisham is a former U.S. House member and former chairwoman of the congressional Hispanic caucus and knows how Washington works. Although New Mexico is not a battleground state with only 5 selectorial college votes, Lujan Grisham’s Hispanic background could help Biden with the emerging Hispanic populations in swing states.

5. Senator Elizabeth Warren: The Massachusetts Senator Warren could help unite the party after the Democratic primary. She overlaps with Independent Senator Bernie Sanders on many policies and could help make sure those voters don’t stay home or cross over and vote for Trump. She will turn 71 in June and for that reason would not be the best candidate as Vice President for 78 year old Biden. Warren was viciously attack by Trump early on for her claim of Native American heritage, and no doubt she will be attacked again.

4. U.S. Senator Tammy Baldwin: This potential pick for Vice President comes from one of the battleground states Biden needs to get elected. Baldwin has served as a senator from Wisconsin since 2012, when she became the first openly gay person ever elected to the Senate. Two years after Trump’s narrow win in Wisconsin, she won reelection by 11 points in 2018.

3. Michigan Governor Gretchen Whitmer: Michigan is one of the three key battleground states that Trump carried narrowly in 2016, with Pennsylvania and Wisconsin being the other two. Governor Whitmer has been among Trump’s most vocal critics during the coronavirus outbreak so much so that Trump referred to her as “that woman” and he told Vice President Pence not to call Whitmer because of her criticism. Trump’s handling of the pandemic and the federal response to the states is turning more and more into a presidential election year issues and she has been at the forefront.

2. Senator Kamala D. Harris: California Senator Harris is the most logical choice by many. She’s the only African American woman serving as either a governor or senator. After an early and impressive campaign beginning which included 20,000 at her announcement, her campaign faltered. She is a former Attorney General of California who earned a reputation as a highly aggressive prosecutor. It was her aggressive approach as a prosecutor that emerged during one early Presidential debate when she attacked in highly personal terms former Vice President Biden over his past position on school busing. Notwithstanding, Harris could easily be an effective Vice-Presidential candidate assuming the attack role reserved for Vice Presidential candidates.

1. U.S. Senator Amy Klobuchar: The Minnesota Senator gave Biden a major boost in his campaign when she dropped out of the race and endorsed Biden before the Super Tuesday primaries helping Biden win her home state. Klobuchar earned strong reviews for her debate performances. She has the kind of Midwestern appeal that will help in states as Michigan or Wisconsin. She is considered a more pragmatic candidate and for that reason would not appeal to most progressive who supported Bernie Sanders and who want Medicare-for-all which she criticized in the debates.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/04/08/11-most-logical-picks-joe-bidens-vice-president-ranked/

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

A. GOVERNOR MICHELLE LUJAN GRISHAM

New Mexico has become accustomed to its Governors having higher ambitions and seeking the office of President or Vice President. Bill Richardson was said to want to be Vice President under Bill Clinton, was appointed UN Secretary by Clinton and then later ran for President himself. Gary Johnson ran for President as the Libertarian candidate for President in 2019. Even former Republican Governor “She Who Must Not Be Named” was said to have high hopes on a national level, especially after she spoke at the Republican National Convention, until she had a Christmas Pizza Party in a luxury hotel room in Santa Fe and we all found out what many knew about her privately.

On Sunday, April 12, Governor Lujan Grisham upped her national profile with an appearance on CNN’s “State of the Union” when she told host Jake Tapper that she’ll do “what’s right” for her state to slow coronavirus spread even if President Donald Trump eases up on social distancing guidelines come May and said “We’re going to make the decisions that safeguard New Mexicans.”

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/12/politics/new-mexico-lujan-grisham-coronavirus-cnntv/index.html)

Lujan Grisham was also profiled in a story in the Washington Times when she expanded her mass gatherings ban to combat spread of the coronavirus to include churches and other houses of worship on Easter saying “While this will be emotionally difficult for so many New Mexicans, public health must be the top priority. The only way to slow the spread of COVID-19 is by staying home and minimizing all person-to-person contact”.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2020/apr/12/michelle-lujan-grisham-new-mexico-governor-expands/

New Mexicans should feel a sense of pride that Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham is being mentioned as former Vice President Joe Biden’s running mate. Notwithstanding, New Mexico needs Governor Lujan Grisham here and now. She has been Governor now for less than 15 months and must deal not only the pandemic but the inevitable financial crisis that has been bought on to the state revenues as a result of the imploding New Mexico Oil industry. She has already announced a special session for June.

It is clear that the corona virus is a very infectious disease that is spreading like a wild fire throughput the world, the United States and now New Mexico. Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham is earning high marks with dealing the crisis. She is taking action to get a handle on the health crisis and it’s called leadership. There is no doubt that Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham knows what she is doing and declaring a “Public Health Emergency” was without a doubt the right call.

Governor Lujan Grisham has the experience, knowledge and credentials to deal with the pandemic crisis. From 2004-2007 she served as the Secretary of the Department of Health, the agency that now assumes power in making decisions regarding coronavirus and public safety. The Governor also served as a longtime director of the New Mexico Agency on Aging, now the Aging and Long-Term Services Department, experience that is timely because the coronavirus is most serious for individuals over 60, many of whom are in nursing facilities that the Governor as a cabinet secretary oversaw.

If Governor Michelle Lujan in fact gets a phone call from Joe Biden’s for an interview, we should all hope that she says very politely: “Mr. Vic President, I am deeply honored, thanks, but no thanks. I need to stay home for now and finish the job I have started, at least for the next 6 years”.

B. BIDEN SHOULD SELECT FORMER FIRST LADY MICHELLE OBAMA

The one woman that seems to be absent from a number of lists for Vice-Presidential for Joe Biden is former First Lady Michelle Obama. She should seriously be considered and asked to continue her family’s service to our country in a time when the type of leadership she could bring is so desperately needed.

Michelle Obama is product of Chicago public school system. The former first lady studied sociology and African-American studies at Princeton University. After graduating from Harvard Law School in 1988, she joined the Chicago law firm Sidley & Austin, where she later met future President Barack Obama.

After a few years, Mrs. Obama decided her true calling was working with people to serve their communities and their neighbors. She served as assistant commissioner of planning and development in Chicago’s City Hall before becoming the founding executive director of the Chicago chapter of Public Allies, an AmeriCorps program that prepares youth for public service.

In 1996, Mrs. Obama joined the University of Chicago with a vision of bringing campus and community together. As Associate Dean of Student Services, she developed the university’s first community service program, and under her leadership as Vice President of Community and External Affairs for the University of Chicago Medical Center, volunteerism skyrocketed.

Mrs. Obama continued her efforts to support and inspire young people during her time as First Lady. In 2010, she launched Let’s Move!, bringing together community leaders, educators, medical professionals, parents, and others in a nationwide effort to address the challenge of childhood obesity. As the first African American First Lady, she inspired generations of African American girls and young woman. She also protected and raised two fine daughters under the glare of the White House press core.

One thing for certain is Michelle Obama could bring a sense of true excitement to the Presidential race, once again creating a solid working relationship not only with a President Joe Biden but also new First Lady Dr. Jill Biden. Also being the wife of former President Barack Obama can only help.

Glimmer Of Hope For New Mexico Oil Industry But Not For State Finances: Russia And OPEC Reach Tentative Agreement To Cut Oil Production

On February 20, the New Mexico legislature ended having enacted a $7.6 Billion dollar budget for the 2020-2021 fiscal year. The enacted budget raised annual spending by $536 million, or by nearly 8% over last year’s budget. The increase in spending was a result of record-breaking oil production in the Permian Basin with the state originally anticipating at least an $800 million increase in state government income during the coming budget year. The legislature also enacted a separate $49.5 million in capital outlay projects. Oil and natural gas represent 39% of New Mexico’s General Fund revenues. The 2020-2021 fiscal year begins July 1.

https://markets.businessinsider.com/commodities/oil-price?type=wti

Passage of the $7.6 billion budget plan for the 2021 budget year was predicated on oil averaging $52 per barrel. Within one month of adjournment of the New Mexico legislature, the corona virus hit the country and hit New Mexico. Within two months after the New Mexico Legislative session ended the oil price war between Russia and the Organization of Petroleum Exports (OPEC) hit the state coffers harder. The result is that the 2020 budget enacted by the New Mexico legislature has been blown apart and the state is faced with a projected $2.5 Billion dollar deficit.

The price of crude oil per barrel had plummeted to an alarming $21 dollars a barrel and as of April 9, rebounded to $31.48 a barrel. With each $1 drop a barrel in oil prices, the state loses upwards of $22 million in direct oil and gas revenue over a full year. Governor Lujan Grisham has announced that she intends to convene a special session to hammer out and enact a new budget that begins on July 1, 2020.

OIL PRODUCTION AND PRICE WAR

In 2017, an oil production agreement was entered into between Russia and the OPEC countries. The agreement suppressed world production approaching 2 million barrels of crude oil a day. The suppressed oil production output lead to very stable oil prices of $50 to $60 a barrel of crude oil. The Russia – OPEC agreement expired on March 31, and the oil producers as expected increased oil production that flooded the global markets with unprecedented levels of supply.

The Russia and OPEC price war sent Brent crude, the global benchmark, $20 a barrel and prompted energy companies including Exxon Mobil Corp. to plan for big spending cuts. Russia and OPEC are boosting their exports just as global oil demand suffers an historic contraction due to the coronavirus pandemic. On March 17 Goldman Sachs Group Inc. the rate of petroleum consumption was dropping by about 8 million barrels a day, or about 8% of global demand. The price of oil has rebounded and as of April 9, it was $31.48 a barrel.

“TENTATIVE” AGREEMENT REACHED BETWEEN OPEC AND RUSSIA

On April 9, it was announced that Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and Russia are negotiating agreements for major cuts in global output that will raise the price of oil. OPEC and Russia agreed in principle to collectively cut oil production by at least 10 million barrels per day. They also agreed to seek a 5-million-barrel daily production from the United States. If successful, the 15 million barrel per day reduction will be the biggest oil reduction in history. Worldwide consumption has fallen upwards of 65 million barrels of oil a day. The oil production is down from 100 million before the corona virus began and engulfed the world.

What is dicey at best is that OPEC and Russia want the United State government to impose state-mandated cuts in oil production and not the let the market force producers to scale back operations through low prices. The problem is that in the United States, demand for oil has fallen 30% to 14.4 million barrels a day which is the lowest level since 1990. US domestic gasoline consumption has also reached a 52-year low.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1442097/opec-tentatively-agrees-to-production-cuts.html

On April 10, OPEC and Russia will seek the five million barrel reduction in additional cuts from the U.S. and Canada and all the 20 nations comprising the G-20 energy ministers. When the the proposed deal emerged ahead of the meeting of oil ministers, the market’s reaction was negative and oil prices fell sharply after the details of the agreement emerged. An Opec official said talks to ratify the deal to cut 10 million barrels a day of production, or roughly 10% of global supply, would continue at the meeting of G20 energy ministers on Friday, April 10.

Global benchmark Brent crude oil reversed a near 11% rally to close down 4% at $31.48 a barrel on Thursday, April 9 as traders doubted the cuts would make up for the fall in demand resulting from the corona virus outbreak and questioned whether the non-Opec producers would contribute.

https://www.ft.com/content/c7a1e2e6-8c17-48d5-8c16-edce911b5cbb

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

It is clear that the corona virus is a very infectious disease that is spreading like a wild fire throughput the world, the United States and now New Mexico. What is happening in the world, country and state are indeed historical in every sense of the word and cannot be downplayed. When it comes to New Mexico, the corona virus is short term compared to the effects of the oil price war on New Mexico’s economy and far more damaging on so many levels.

State officials and oil industry leaders are hoping a modest rebound in oil prices heading into summer as the corona virus contagion slows and businesses and consumer demand bounces back. For now, when it comes to New Mexico’s budget, the worst needs to be prepared for as actually happening. With a projected $2.5 Billion shortfall, there is no doubt that the NM Legislature and Governor Lujan Grisham are facing a major financial and government budget crisis. In times of crisis, drastic measures at times must be taken. Convening a special session, repealing the 2020-2021 budget and going to a “zero growth budget” are such drastic measures, but indeed must be done.

Two Financial Gut Punches: One To State Budget, One To Alb. City Budget; Both Facing Severe Budget Cuts For Fiscal Year 2021 That Both Begin July 1, 2020

GOOD FINANCIAL TIME FOR STATE COMING TO AN END

On February 20, the New Mexico legislature within a few hours before adjourning enacted a $7.6 Billion dollar budget for the fiscal year that begins on July 1. It raised annual spending by $536 million, or by nearly 8% over last year’s budget. The increase in spending was a result of record-breaking oil production in the Permian Basin with the state the time anticipating at least an $800 million increase in state government income during the coming budget year. The legislature also enacted a separate $49.5 million in capital outlay projects.

The increase spending of $536 million included funding for Governor Lujan Grisham’s major priorities. An Early Childhood Trust Fund of $320 million was approved with the goal of putting $30 million annually toward the cause of early childhood programs needed for many years. The new budget includes $17 million for the new college scholarship program sought by Lujan Grisham which is much less than the Governor had initially requested.

TWO “GUT PUNCHES”

Just when things were looking great with respect to oil and gas royalties to finance state government, BAM the corona virus hits, a global oil price war ensues, and New Mexico gets a two gut punch hit in the process, all within one month since the adjournment of the New Mexico legislature. The global oil price war has hit hard the state’s revenue boom and it has caused the state budget surplus to evaporate literally within 8 weeks. The price of oil per barrel has now plummeted to $20 dollars a barrel.

https://markets.businessinsider.com/commodities/oil-price?type=wti

NEW MEXICO’S RELIANCE ON OIL AND GAS REVENUES

A report by the New Mexico Tax Research Institute released in January, 2020, revealed that the oil and natural gas industry contributed more than $3.1 billion in tax revenue for fiscal year 2019, a dramatic 41% from the $2.2 billion generated the year before. The $3.1 billion was an increase of $910 million from 2018. Oil and natural gas represent 39% of New Mexico’s General Fund revenues, the highest share of all industries in recent history.

https://www.nmoga.org/FuelingNewMexico

The New Mexico oil industry’s historic energy production was enabling unprecedented investment by Mew Mexico in education. In FY 2019, the oil and gas industry contributed $1.36 billion to public education, representing a 28% increase over FY 2018. New Mexico’s highest producing oil and gas counties were Lea and Eddy County.

According to the Legislative Finance Committee (LFC), a $1 change in the average annual New Mexico price of oil has an impact of roughly $22 million on the state general fund. The LFC also said money generated from taxes and royalties on oil and natural gas accounted for roughly 36% of New Mexico’s total revenue for last year. For the enacted budget, oil prices were projected to average $52 per barrel of crude oil produced. According to the Governor’s Office, if oil prices were to hover at $30 per barrel through June, that would mean $138 million less in state revenue than projected for this fiscal year. Oil prices have now plummeted to a staggering $20 a barrel. Upwards of 25% of the state’s spending contained in its budget is for reserve funds.

This year, New Mexico’s two largest permanent funds, the Land Grant Permanent Fund and Severance Tax Permanent Fund, funds were supposed to pump an all-time high of nearly $1.1 billion into state schools, hospitals and other programs in the coming 2020-2021 budget year that starts July 1. The funding was supposed to have come from investment gains and inflows from taxes and royalties from oil production in southeast New Mexico. But that has all changed because of the oil price war.

SPECIAL SESSION OF NEW MEXICO LEGISLATURE TO BE CALLED

On March 19, Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham sent a letter to the NM legislative leaders telling them that she will convene a special session to deal with the imploding oil prices that has caused a budget crisis for the state. It is likely that the session will be called in mid June. According to Governor Lujan Grisham, when she calls for the special session, it will focus on adjusting the proposed spending levels for the budget year that starts in July 1. It will also address public health needs to deal with the pandemic and crafting an economic relief package for workers, businesses and New Mexico communities.

There is no doubt that the $7.6 billion budget that takes effect July 1 and approved by the NM Legislature will have to be slashed significantly. The state is facing a $1 Billion dollar revenue downturn.

House Appropriations and Finance Committee Chairwoman Patricia Lundstrom, D-Gallup had this to say:

“We’re going to have to do some major re-calibration on the budget. … Everything is going to have to be on the table.”

In government financing the term everything means significant spending cuts, drawing down the state’s reserve levels and repealing one-time spending that was passed in the 2020 session, including the $320 million for a new early childhood trust fund and $180 million for statewide road repairs. Lundstrom also contradicted herself slightly when she added the approach to the new budget would likely not include across-the-board cuts, and that funding levels for health care programs and economic development initiatives should be kept intact.

The state does have what is called “the tax stabilization reserve fund” with funding set aside to deal with financial crisis such as what it happening now. The fund is called “the rainy day fund”. In December, the state was projected to have $1.7 billion in reserves at the end of the current budget year on June 31, or nearly 25% of all state spending.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1441810/nm-faces-difficult-choices-in-budget-redo.html

STATES SHARE OF $2 TRILLION FEDERAL STIMULUS PACKAGE

On March 25, the United State Congress enacted the $2 trillion Corona Virus stimulus package known as the CARES Act. Under the CARES Act, State governments that are leading the coronavirus response, which includes New Mexico, will get support from a $150 billion coronavirus expenditures fund. New Mexico will be eligible for up to $1.25 billion to reimburse costs resulting from the pandemic.

The federal funding legislation will provide immediate relief to New Mexicans. The $2 trillion package includes several provisions that would support New Mexican residents including direct relief for small businesses, emergency resources for hospitals, and direct payments to individual residents.

According to New Mexico Senator Tom Udall the funding is “targeted primarily to New Mexico as a state government and local/municipal governments.” The legislation includes the expansion of unemployment insurance to cover more New Mexicans and provides additional benefits during this health crisis. The extended unemployment insurance program increases the maximum unemployment benefit by $600 per week and makes sure that workers who are laid-off, on average, will receive full pay for four months.

The bill ensures all workers are protected regardless of their place of work and includes employees at small, medium, and large businesses .

According to an April 3 Channel 13 news report:

“Furloughed workers are allowed to stay on as employees to ensure that when the crisis is over, they will be able to continue work with their employer. The legislation provides $1,200 in direct payments to individual New Mexicans, $2,400 for couples who are married, and $500 per child. The full payment is available for those making up to $75,000 individually and $150,000 for those who are married. The amount is phased out for those who are above the income cap.

The legislation features provisions to support and provide relief to small businesses that were negatively impacted by the coronavirus outbreak.The bill includes $377 billion in small business aid and includes up to $10 million in Payment Protection Program loans for small businesses who have up to 500 employees. The loans will be converted to grants as long as employers maintain their previous payroll through December 31, 2019.

The bill provides over $150 billion for the healthcare system and includes funding for medical facilities and hospitals. It puts $100 billion into hospitals and the health system, over $1 billion into the Indian Health Service, and billions into investments.”

https://www.krqe.com/health/coronavirus-resources/what-the-coronavirus-stimulus-bill-means-for-new-mexicans/

GOOD FINANCIAL TIMES FOR CITY HALL COMING TO AN END

The City of Albuquerque had a fantastic fiscal year that began on July 1, 2019 and that will end on June 30, 2020. It is no exaggeration that the city in a real sense was flush with money during the fiscal year that is about to end.

For the fiscal year of July 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020, the Albuquerque City Council enacted an operating budget of $1.1 billion for the fiscal year. It was the first time in city history that the city operating budget exceed the $1 Billion figure. The 2019-2020 budget represented an overall 11% increase in spending over the previous year.

In April, 2019 a onetime $34.4 million dollar windfall to the city was reported from what was called an “orphan month”. The $34.3 million “one-time, lifetime” boost in revenues could not be applied by the city toward recurring costs. $29 million of the $34.3 million was applied to numerous one-time investments the Keller Administration felt important, including $6 million for public safety vehicles such as police cars for new police cadets, $2.3 million for park security, $2 million for the business recruitment and growth and $2 million for housing vouchers and related programs.

https://www.petedinelli.com/2019/04/04/orphan-month-windfall-of-34-million-used-for-1-1-billion-city-budget-no-new-taxes-city-to-charge-for-car-crash-clean-ups-and-vehicle-fires/

On October 7, 2019 the City Council approved a $30.5 million “Sports -Tourism” lodger tax package on a unanimous vote submitted Mayor Keller to upgrade and build sports facilities throughout the city. Revenue generated by the lodger’s is used to pay off the $30.5 million bond debt. Lodger tax revenues are supposed to be used to promote tourism and tourism functions and facilities and not general sports venues used by the general public.

http://documents.cabq.gov/budget/fy-20-proposed-budget.pdf

CITY FINANCING EXPLAINED

The current gross receipt tax added to virtually all retail sales of goods and services is 7.7850%. Businesses collect the tax on each sale made and the money is then sent to the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department and each month the state the distributes the city’s portion of tax collected to the city. Retail businesses make up about 25% of all the city’s gross receipts tax collected.

Gross receipts tax is collected and given to the city accounts for 67% of the City’s general fund revenue. The gross receipts tax revenue pays for basic municipal operations and essential services such as police protection, fire protection, solid waste collection, street repairs, animal welfare, parks maintenance, social services and the wages and benefits of over 6,000 city employees. For the current fiscal year that ends on July 31, 202, the city averaged upwards of $41 million in gross receipts tax revenue or $492 million dollars for the year. The remaining 33% of revenues needed to operate the city are generated other fees, other tax revenues and federal funding.

DRAMATIC DECLINE IN GROSS RECEIPTS TAX REVENUES FOR CITY

Under the City of Albuquerque City Charter, the Office of the Mayor prepares the yearly operating budget and normally it is submitted to the City Council on April 1 with the City Council holding budget hearings and making changes and must approve by law a balance city budget by July 1. The operating word is “normally”. All that changed with the corona virus, the mandated quarantine, the mandatory shut down of retail businesses, the loss gross receipts tax revenues and the loss of revenues by the state because of the oil crash.

According to Albuquerque Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Sanjay Bhakta, “It’s going to be brutal” and the city is facing a gaping budget hole due to the anticipated reduction in tax revenue. It is unclear how much the city will have to spend reacting to and battling coronavirus. There are new costs associated with cleaning and cleaning supplies and services for children and seniors. Some existing operating costs no doubt include , the city’s police officers and firefighters that are currently devoting to coronavirus-related matters.

Bhakta reported that the lodgers tax revenues are also down and in March came in at 29% lower than the same date last year. The decline in lodger tax revenues can be blamed on the hotel industry’s more recent struggles and decline in room occupancy. Bhakta said he’s concerned that what has happened with the lodgers tax may also happen with gross receipts tax.

$100,000 A DAY SPENT ON CITY RESPONSE

During the April 7 meeting of the Albuquerque City Council, Bhakta, told the council that the City is spending about $100,000 per day on its response to the corona virus. According to Bhakta, the expenses include employee overtime, cleaning supplies and “information technology” programs. The corona virus has yet to peak, and the daily expenses will go up before they go down and there is no way of determining when the health crisis will end.

The biggest problem is not the daily expenses to the city. Its anticipated that the city’s budget will take a major hit in the form of lost tax revenue. 67% of the City’s general fund revenues is from its share of gross receipts tax collected by the state. It is the general fund that is used to finance basic essential services such as police, fire and street maintenance and other basic city services.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1441397/city-of-abqs-coronavirus-costs-average-100k-a-day.html

City ordinance requires adequate reserve for each fiscal year to deal with unexpected contingencies. CFO Bhakta reported to the City Council the city does have a slight cushion of about $50 million in operating reserves set aside due to higher-than-expected gross receipts tax revenue over the past 7 months, but it’s not enough to absorb the expected losses in revenues. The challenge is having an adequate reserve for the fiscal year that begins July 1, which is mandated by city ordinance.

According to CFO Bhakta, the City will have a better sense of the loss of revenue in mid-May when the city gets its March gross receipts tax distribution from the state Taxation and Revenue Department.

CITY’S SHARE OF $2 TRILLION FEDERAL STIMULUS CANNOT BE USED AS BUDGET SUPPLEMENT TO MAKE UP FOR LOST REVENUES

The $2 trillion-dollar federal stimulus packaged known as the CARES Act has $150 billion for payments to the state, tribal and local governments. Each state is guaranteed at least $1.25 billion, but local governments with more than 500,000 people can seek their own direct share from their state’s pot. A spokeswoman for U.S. Sen. Tom Udall, D-N.M., said the local governments must file requests that are then certified by the U.S. Department of the Treasury.

The problem with the $2 Trillion stimulus is that the legislation restricts the funding to “costs that are necessary expenditures incurred due to the coronavirus public health emergency between March 1 and December 30. It is expected that the city of Albuquerque will qualify for upwards of $150 million. However, the stimulus money can not be used for expenses outlined in existing budgets. In other words, the federal relief is not intended to make up for lost tax revenues like the city is faced with and which will have a crippling impact on the city’s budget.
News coverage can be found at these links:

https://www.abqjournal.com/1438922/lost-tax-revenue-to-have-brutal-impact-on-abq-city-budget.html

https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/coronavirus-threatens-city-budget/5692185/?cat=500

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

For the full 8 years under the former Republican Mayor Administration and the former Republican Governor Administration, the city and state were hit hard because of the great recession to the extent that essential services were dramatically cut and city and state government were dramatically downsized all done in order to avoid any all tax increases to maintain their philosophy that all tax increases are bad and government is too big and needed to be downsized

Last fiscal year, both the City and State were finally able to get things back on tract primarily because tax revenues increased and a massive surplus resulting from the oil and gas revenues associated with the Permian Basin oil boom. Just as the city and state were pulling out of the 10-year great recession, the country, state and city get hit and get hit hard in the gut with the corona virus pandemic resulting in business closures, layoffs and the stock market crashing and the New Mexico oil industry imploding because the price of crude oil has gone from $50 a barrel to $20 a barrel.

No one knows for certain how long the economic shutdown from coronavirus will last, it could be weeks, months and perhaps even more. Additionally, no one knows for certain how long the price war between Russia and OPEC Countries will continue. The two events combined have pushed the price of U.S. benchmark West Texas Intermediate to $20.06 a barrel as of March 19, the lowest price per barrel of crude oil since 1998.

It is likely the City will not see another $1.1 billion dollar budget this year and not likely to see another for a number of years to follow. City hall is facing another period of declining revenues to the point that its budget will have to be slashed once again. The extent of the city’s financial crisis will no doubt be reflected in the Keller Administration’s proposed 2020-2021 budget, a budget that was supposed to have been released on April 1, but this is not normal times and city hall no doubt scrambling to figure out what to do during the financial crisis it faces.

It is also likely that the State will also suffer and that the slashing of the budget will have to be done, and fast. The Land Grant Permanent Fund (LGPF), also known as the Permanent School Fund, is one of the largest funds of its kind in the country, and every year provides more than a half-billion dollars in benefits to New Mexico’s public schools, universities and other beneficiaries . In fiscal year 2020, the Land Grant Permanent Fund generated $784.2 for New Mexico Schools. Now is the time to finally divert more money to address the education needs of the state with the fund to substitute money allocated in the new budget.

Further, now is the time to allocate funding form the “tax stabilization reserve fund” to deal with the budget crisis. The real problem is will it be enough to deal with the crisis or will the state deplete the entire reserve of $1.7 Billion within the upcoming year with no way of replenishing it because of the oil industry bust.

If the State and the City in fact plunge into another recession which is highly likely and its much deeper than the 10 year great recession that started in 2008, Governor Lujan Grisham as well as Mayor Tim Keller will start to look and sound like their former Republican predecessors saying “cut, slash and reduce taxes at all costs” and both just might wind up serving only one term as Governor and Mayor.

Mayor Tim Keller Becomes “Crisis Management Mayor”; City Spending Upwards of $100,000 A Day Dealing With Crisis; Mayor Conducts “Virtual Town Hall Meetings”, Murder And Domestic Violence Rates Rise

BECOMING A CRISIS MANAGEMENT MAYOR

On Wednesday, March 18, less than 48 hours after the Albuquerque City Council passed and amended “Emergency Powers Ordinance”, Mayor Tim Keller declared a “public health emergency” to deal with the corona virus epidemic in the city. The Mayor announced and signed the “Declaration of Local State of Emergency Due to Novel Corona Virus COVID-19” on a video posted on social media and distributed to the local new outlets. In the video announcement, Keller said the declaration “frees up financial resources for our city and flexibility so we can deal with this situation the best way possible.”

You can review the entire video here:

https://www.facebook.com/MayorKeller/videos/2994717313900761/UzpfSTEwNTQ4MTY4OTY6MTAyMTk0OTExNjc0ODM4OTI/

With his Public Health Emergency declaration, Mayor Tim Keller became the first Mayor in the city’s history to become a “crisis management Mayor” to deal with a major health crisis and epidemic. How Keller acts and leads in a substantive manner will likely determine if he is a one term mayor.

The emergency declaration allows the Keller administration to allocate city staff as necessary to address the current COVID-19 pandemic. It also allows for the city to make “emergency procurements” to protect the health and safety of citizens and property. It also serves as a request for state and federal assistance.

The Mayor’s Emergency Declaration” makes two specific requests for financial assistance from the New Mexico Department of Homeland Security and Emergency Management and state agencies and the Federal Emergency Management Agency. The entire written Emergency Declaration can be read here:

http://www.cabq.gov/mayor/documents/emergecy-declaration.pdf

$100,000 A DAY SPENT ON CITY RESPONSE; EXPECT MAJOR HIT TO GENERAL FUND REVENUES

During the April 7 meeting of the Albuquerque City Council, Sanjay Bhakta, the Chief Financial Officer for the City, told the council that the City is spending about $100,000 per day on its response to the corona virus. According to Bhakta, the expenses include employee overtime, cleaning supplies and “information technology” programs. The corona virus has yet to peak, and the daily expenses will go up before they go down.

The biggest problem is not the daily expenses to the city. Its anticipated that the city’s budget will take a major hit in the form of lost tax revenue. 67% of the City’s general fund revenues is from its share of gross receipts tax collected by the state. It is the general fund that is used to finance basic essential services such as police, fire and street maintenance and other basic city services.

Albuquerque’s current gross receipts tax is 7.8750% and each quarter cent generates upwards of $60 million in revenues a year to the city. With retail businesses forced to closure under the state’s stay-at-home order, the city will inevitably see a major loss in gross receipts tax that will mandate major cuts to the general fund budget and that will have an impact on essential services.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1441397/city-of-abqs-coronavirus-costs-average-100k-a-day.html

A NEW LEVEL OF PUBLIC RELATIONS TO INFORM THE PUBLIC

Ever since Mayor Tim Keller assumed office on December 1, 2017, he has taken photo ops and press conferences to all new levels. Keller attends protest rallies to speak at, attends marches and political protests, attends heavy metal concerts to introduce the band, runs in track meets and participates in exhibition football games as the quarterback and enjoying reliving his high school glory days and posting pictures and videos on his FACEBOOK page.

With the corona virus pandemic, Keller is now conducting daily press briefings on the city’s efforts to deal with the corona virus and attempting to keep up with Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham’s daily briefings on the state level. The corona virus pandemic is also allowing Mayor Keller to take his public relations efforts to even higher levels to deal with the pandemic and to announce city initiatives and inform the public.

The best example of the new level of public relations is that Keller and his longtime political consultant Alan Packman, who now works full time for the City’s 311 call center, and other top Keller Administration Department Directors are conducting “virtual town hall” meetings. The town hall meetings are sophisticated telephone conference calls to thousands to provide to the public information and to answer the public’s questions regarding what the city is doing.

Mayor Keller makes the calls to city residences and he begins the call by telling the person who answers the phone, including cell phones, to stay on the line in order to participate. Instructions are given on how to ask a question of the Mayor. It’s is more likely than not that it’s the city’s 311 Call Center that is assisting with providing the phone numbers of targeted city residents to make calls to participate.

On April 1, Mayor Keller and Alan Packman, along with other key staff participants including an APD Deputy Chief and the Directors of Economic Development and of Human Services conducted a second virtual town hall. It was represented that upwards of 14,000 people were “on the line” participating in the townhall. The townhall allowed for questions that were screened as Alann Packman acted as the announcer and the one that identified the callers.

KELLER ANNOUNCES CITY INITIATIVES

On March 15, three days before Keller declared a “public health” emergency, the city announced it would continue essential services while maximizing distance between employees. It announced that all BioPark facilities will be closed through April 15. It likely the BioPark closure will be extended.

According to a news release, all employees who can will be allowed to “teleworking” to work from home. Non-essential employees who cannot telework were sent home. Essential employees who can work in the field such as solid waste workers will be asked to do so exclusively. Workers who are unable to go into work because of these policies are paid leave.

The City announced that the Westside Emergency Housing Center is be kept open 24-hours a day until further notice with the city screening and testing people who are using the shelter.

On March 30, the Keller Administration made the following announcements regarding city building and services:

CITYWIDE: All City buildings were closed to the public, as of 5 p.m., March 24. This includes City Hall.

CITY CLERK: All hearings were either postponed or will be held remotely.

PLANNING DEPARTMENT: Plaza del Sol, where the Planning Deaprtment is located, was closed to the public. Permitting will continues via telephone, while inspections and field work continue as normal.

ALBUQUERQUE-BERNALILLO COUNTY WATER UTILITY AUTHORITY: All walk-in payment locations are temporarily closed. Payments may be mailed or made online.

PARKS & RECREATION AND CITYWIDE YOUTH PROGRAMS:

All Spring Break youth programs have been canceled.
City golf courses are closed
All playgrounds in City parks are closed, although the parks themselves will remain open.
The Maloof Air Park is closed.
Horsemen’s Complex is closed; however, owners must continue to care for their animals.

ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY CITY SOCIAL SERVICE CENTERS

The Keller Administration announced that people who have medical needs that have been made worse by the corona virus will be able to get help at one of four Health and Social Services Centers in Albuquerque. According to Deputy Director of Public Health Gilbert Ramirez, each quadrant of the city has a center, and each has been designated a “mission critical” facility.

The services and items provided by the centers include monthly food boxes, limited supplies of diapers and hygiene products, and clothing. The centers also have an eviction prevention program funded by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development. Tenants facing eviction must have identification and a lease or payment history that reflects delinquency and how much is owed. The problem is the federal program has just under $47,000 available. The city is asking for donations for its motel voucher program for homeless people, particularly for those who have chronic medical problems and reduced immune systems.

Two community centers have been designated to provide emergency shelter for those who do not have the virus but are in the higher-risk older-age demographic. Individuals placed at the 2 centers must be referred from the West Side Emergency Housing Center.

CORONA VIRUS RESPONSE TEAMS

On March 19, 2020 Mayor Tim Keller activated what he called short- and long-term coronavirus response teams. The teams are responsible for identifying critical city plans related to a wide range of actions including: community health, emergency funding, kids programming, economic and housing impacts, workers’ well being. The teams also focus on what it will take to keep essential services going while considering socioeconomic consequences and social distancing and other public health precautions.

https://www.cabq.gov/office-of-emergency-management/news/mayor-keller-initiates-response-and-recovery-teams

MICRO-BUSINESS RELIEF PROGRAM

On Monday, March 30, in order to help small businesses in Albuquerque affected by the Corona Virus closures, Mayor Tim Keller and the city’s Economic Development Department announced a $500,000 Micro-Business Relief Program. It is a grant program that offered up to $5,000 to small businesses who meet the following requirements:

1. The business must have 5 or fewer employees, including the owner(s).
2. The business must be registered and physically located within Albuquerque city limits.
3. The business must have experienced financial hardship due to COVID-19.
4. The business must have been in business for at least 6 months.
5. Grant funds must be deposited into a business bank account and only be used for business expenses. The City of Albuquerque will make electronic deposits.
6. Business owners must agree to provide a report about the use and results of the grant funds six months after receipt.
7. Businesses that are franchises or restricted to patrons above the age of 18 or older will not be eligible for the award — like bars or smoke shops.

The city’s web page on the grant program with application can be found here:

https://www.cabq.gov/economicdevelopment/small-business/micro-business-relief-program

Mayor Keller had this to say in announcing the grant program:

“Albuquerque small businesses are vital not only to our economy, but to the vibrant fabric of our community. The next few months will be tough, and we’re committed to supporting our local economy through this unprecedented and uncertain time. Through the Micro-Business Relief Program, we’re supporting small businesses across Albuquerque that are hurting because of COVID-19. We reached out to business leaders and organizations to develop this program and fill a gap for small companies so they can stay afloat.”

On April 2, a mere 3 days after the grant program was announced, it was reported that more than 500 businesses applied for the micro-business grants, hundreds more than the program will be able to pay. The total grant funding was $500,000 and it provides for up to $5,000 in working capital grants dictating that only 100 businesses will be able to secure a grant.

GOING FORWARD WITH APPROVED CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS

On April 1, the City of Albuquerque announced it was going forward with $70 million worth of construction projects in the next six months. According to city officials, the work will not only produce new facilities and improved infrastructure but also promote construction activity during the economy’s COVID-19-related ever-increasing slowdown. Virtually all of the projects have existing funding including the $128 million general obligation bond program city voters approved last November, 2020 NM Legislature appropriations and past bond cycle funding.

Albuquerque Chief Operating Officer Lawrence Rael had this to say about the construction projects:

“We know part of the recovery in the community is the economy … and how the economy rebounds after we get past this pandemic that we’re facing. Part of that is investing in our infrastructure in a way that makes sense for the community but also creates economic vitality.”

The $70 million dollars in construction projects include:

A $7 million International District public library
A pump station meant to thwart flooding in the city’s downtown core
A new Singing Arrow Community Center in Southeast Albuquerque
A West Side community center at 98th and DeVargas
A new field at the Jennifer Riordan Spark Kindness Sports Complex
Upgrading the pedestrian underpass at First and Central
Americans with Disabilities Act-related improvements in several areas of the city
Construction of a roundabout at 12th and Menaul

Included in the $70 million is installing new “pin curbing” and medians along parts of the Albuquerque Rapid Transit (ART) route. The ART Bus line has been temporarily suspended as a result of the corona virus pandemic. During the temporary closure, the city is constructing “pin curbs” which are concrete edging to form a barrier on the outside boundary of the dedicated bus lanes to prevent vehicles from traveling into the dedicated lanes.

Although the city and state are under “stay at home” orders to deal with the corona virus, construction is considered essential work under current state orders issued by Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham.

https://www.abqjournal.com/1439251/city-carries-on-with-planned-construction.html

CONVENTION CENTER UNDER CONSIDERATION FOR PATIENT CARE

On April 4 , Mayor Keller announce that the Albuquerque Convention Center is under consideration for use as a potential space for COVID-19 patients. The east wing of the building would work as an emergency hospital and the west would could be used as a place for essential employees to stay if they need to quarantine and can’t go home. The Mayor said the convention center space is not needed right now, but that they will be reevaluating to make sure the space is ready in case they do need it. The former Lovelace Hospital on Gibson is the first choice for such use and it has upwards of 300 patient rooms.

https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/city-officials-evaluate-downtown-convention-center-as-potential-space-for-covid-19-patients/5692186/?cat=500

MURDER AND DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RATES RISE

On March 26, a Channel 7 investigative report found there have been 51 fewer people arrested on felonies when compared to the same time last year. There is also a 6% drop in police reports filed this year.

Notwithstanding, some say they are seeing more crime despite what the data says. In the same news report Peter Darrel Kindig, owner of Narrowgate Security Agency said businesses that are forced to close have been calling him, wanting his service and a new type of security system that alerts security officers in the field if there is suspicious motion.

According to Kindig:

“The number of car burglaries and business burglaries in the last 48 hours is completely off the chart. My phone is ringing off the hook. … People now don’t want just an alarm that goes off after they are burglarized. … They want something that alerts before the burglary takes place.”

https://www.koat.com/article/are-criminals-staying-home-too/31947490

Despite the coronavirus outbreak and the self-quarantine measures, the city’s increase in homicides is continuing. In 2019, Albuquerque had its 19th homicide on April 11 and on April 2, 2019 there were 17 homicides in the city.

On April 2, 2020, the Albuquerque Police Department announced there have been 19 homicides in the city in 2020, which is ahead of 2019’s record-setting homicide pace. The city’s 19th homicide happened around on Thursday, April 2nd near Central and University.

https://www.kob.com/albuquerque-news/albuquerque-on-pace-to-set-new-homicide-record/5690589/?cat=500

On April 5, the online news agency New Mexico Politcal reported that “domestic violence incidents in Bernalillo County reportedly jumped 78 percent, right in line with soaring unemployment, gun sales and other predictors of abuse. … Across New Mexico, domestic violence survivors and the shelters that serve them are confronting a new and uncertain landscape brought on by the coronavirus pandemic. Stay-at-home orders have effectively kept victims inside with their abusers, depriving them of a safe time and place to call for help.”

https://nmpoliticalreport.com/2020/04/05/domestic-violence-shelters-have-no-shortage-of-beds-but-reports-of-abuse-are-on-the-rise/?mc_cid=b0fbedca06&mc_eid=d03b0979c3

KELLER APPOINTS 3rd CHIEF OF STAFF

On March 17, Mayor Tim Keller appointed 53 year old Michael Puelle, formerly CEO and lobbyist for Associated General Contractors (AGC) New Mexico, as his chief of staff. According to the news release announcing the appointment, Puelle “will manage and direct the day-to-day operations of the Office of Mayor, supervising a number of areas including public affairs, constituent services, communication, intergovernmental relations, strategic initiatives, community engagement, and administrative functions” Puelle replaces government affairs veteran Santiago Chavez as Keller’s Chief of Staff. making him the third one to hold the post under Keller.

For 10 years, Puelle was the Chief Executive Officer and Director of Public Policy and Government Relations for Associated General Contractors (AGC) New Mexico. In addition to lobbying for the general contractor’s association, he oversaw its state-wide strategic agenda, staff, budget, and programming, as well as directing and coordinating advocacy efforts and community engagement activities.

Sarita Nair remains Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) for the city. The CAO is a position mandated by the City Charter to supervise the overall daily affairs of government, and all city departments including the police and fire departments and city attorney’s office.

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

A) A POLITICAL APPOINTMENT

The appointment of Michael Puelle by Mayor Keller as his new Chief of Staff was purely political. It raised more than a few concerns within city hall. The position is not mandated by the city charter nor created by ordinance, yet it clearly one of the top paid executives, at will positions, at city hall. The appointment makes political sense on many levels.

The appointment is consistent with the approach Keller is taking to help mitigate the economic damage cause by the pandemic to the Albuquerque business community and the city’s economy and going forward with major construction projects. It makes sense politically in that Keller will no doubt will be asking support of the construction industry and developers as he deals with the pandemic crisis and runs for another term. Keller will want and need their contributions either directly to his Mayor’s campaign or to measured finance committees set up to promote Keller’s election to a second term.

With the appointment of Puelle as his third Chief of staff by Mayor Keller, the construction industry and the city developers now have an executive they can rely on for help during the impending and likely recession to help orchestrate construction and development projects. Puelle’s connections and his friendships within the Associated General Contractors, and his connections within the construction and development industries will also come in handy as Mayor Tim Keller seeks his second term next year.

B) CRISIS MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS

By all accounts, Mayor Tim Keller is taking as many initiatives that he can in order to deal with the corona virus pandemic. He appears to be doing his best to show leadership as he tries to keep up with the ever-evolving crisis and as he tries to follow the lead of Governor Michelle Lujan Grisham. The city’s funding of small business grants and going forward with $70 million in construction projects will provide tangible work and progress that has been undertaken by the Mayor during the pandemic.

The number of corona cases in the city and state has yet to peak. There is no guarantee any of the major initiatives will be effective enough to deal with the pandemic let alone mitigate the inevitable recession the city will likely be confronted with within a year.

https://www.krqe.com/health/coronavirus-new-mexico/mayor-keller-albuquerque-officials-to-give-update-on-local-coronavirus-response/

C) VIOLENT CRIME RATES STILL PERSISTENT PROBLEM

On April 2, 2020, the Albuquerque Police Department announced there have been 19 homicides in the city in 2020, which is ahead of 2019’s record-setting homicide pace. The fact that “domestic violence” incidents in Bernalillo County reportedly jumped 78% since the corona virus outbreak, right in line with soaring unemployment, gun sales and other predictors of abuse, is an alarming trend that indicates the city’s violent crime rates are still escalating despite the quarantine or stay at home orders. Under Mayor Keller the city’s crime rates have continued and become even worse under his tenure.

CONCLUSION

In 2021, voters will be deciding if Mayor Tim Keller has kept his promises and done a good job. Voters will also be deciding if he has done a good job in managing and handling the delivery of city services in the middle of a epidemic, including public safety initiatives. How Keller reacts and the extent of leadership he provides that make a difference during the pandemic will have the effect of determining if Mayor Tim Keller is a one term Mayor.

For a elated blog article see:

Keller And Packman Together Again