Chavez, Keller, Uballez Make Mayoral Ballot; Varela, Sanchez And White Within Striking Distance Of Ballot; 4 Will Fail To Make Ballot; Armijo A “Maybe”; Uballez And Sanchez Withdraw From Public Finance; Keller Needs 740 More $5 Donations, White Needs 1,780 More $5 Donations By June 21 To Qualify For Public Finance 

The 11 candidates who have registered with the City Clerk as candidates for Mayor listed in the order by the City Clerk on the city candidate web page are:

  1. Mayling Armijo
  2. Eddie Varela
  3. Patrick Sais
  4. Darren White
  5. Timothy Keller
  6. Louie Sanchez
  7. Alpana Adair
  8. Brian Fejer
  9. Alexander M. M. Uballez
  10. Daniel Chavez
  11. Adeo Herrick

https://www.cabq.gov/vote/candidate-information/2025-candidates-and-committees-1

All 11 candidates are required to collect 3,000 qualifying nominating signatures.

Originally, 8 candidates applied for public finance, now there are 2 with the other 6 withdrawing their applications for public finance.

Public financed candidates must collect 3,780 donations of $5.00 to the city from registered voters to qualify for the city to give them $755,946 in city financing for their campaigns.

The time frame to collect both nominating petition signatures and $5.00 qualifying contributions is the same and it is from April 19, 2025 to June 21, 2025, a mere 64 days. As of May 30, with 42 days expiring, there are only 22 days remaining to collect nominating petition signatures and $5.00 qualifying donations.

QUALIFYING NOMINATING PETITION SIGNATURES

All eleven candidates must collect at least 3,000 qualifying nominating petition signatures from April 19, 2025 to June 21, 2025, a mere 64 days, to secure a ballot positon. Each signature must come from registered voters in the Albuquerque area. City clerk’s go through each one of the signatures to confirm their registration. Candidates can challenge each other’s signatures for disqualification. The signatures of people who sign the nomination petitions and who are not actually registered voters are tossed and are not counted.

Following is the breakdown of petition signatures collected by the 11 candidates as of June 6, 2025 as tabulated by the city clerk:

DANIEL CHAVEZ

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                     3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                        3,422
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                      2,338
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                       -0-
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                     100% 

TIMOTHY KELLER

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                     3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                        3,829
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                         683
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                         -0-
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                     100%

ALEXANDER UBALLEZ

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                       3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                          3,179
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                          542
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                          -0-
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                      100%

EDDIE VARELA

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                        3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                          2,602
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                           699
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                          398
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                        87%

LOUIE SANCHEZ

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                        3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                          2,180
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                           625
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                          820
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                         73%

DARREN WHITE

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                         3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                            2,061
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                            161
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                            939
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                           69%

MAYLING ARMIJO

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                         3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                            1,589
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                            610
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                         1,411
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                           53%

PATRICK SAIS

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                          3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                               862
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                             826
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                         2,138
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                           22%

BRIAN FEJER

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                         3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                                77
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                              -0-
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                         2,923
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                            3%

ALPANA ADAIR

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                          3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                                 19
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                               19
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                           2,981
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                             1%

ADEO HERRICK

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                           3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                                  35
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                               28
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                          2,965
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                              1%

COMMENTARY AND ANALSIS ON QUALIFYING PETITION SIGNATURES

As of June 6, the City Clerk has verified 3 candidates who have collected the required 3,000 qualifying nominating petition signatures to be placed on the November 4 ballot. Those candidates are Democrats Mayor Tim Keller, former United States Attorney Alexander Uballez and Republican businessman Daniel Chavez who have secured 100% of the required verified qualifying petition signatures of 3,000.

Fifteen days, from June 6  to June 21, remain to collect the balance of the qualifying nominating petition signatures by the remaining candidates.

Republican Eddie Varela is on track to secure the required 3,000 signatures to get on the ballot with 2,602 signatures collected or 87%.  Varela needs 398  more signatures which is very doable within the 15 days left in the collection process. (On May 30, Varela  had collected 1,998 or 67%.)

Democrat City Council Louie Sanchez has spiked in the collection of the 3,000 required signatures with 2,180 verified signatures collected or 73%. (On May 30 Sanchez had collected 1,707 signatures or 57%.) Sanchez needs to collect  820 more signatures to get on the ballot. With 15 days left in the collection process it is more likely than not Sanchez will collect them.

Republican Darren White has spiked in the collection of the 3,000 required signatures with 2,061 verified signatures collected or 69% collected. (On May 30 White had collected 1,699 or 57%.)  White now needs 939  more signatures to get on the ballot and with 15 left in the collection process it is more likely than not White will collect them.

Democrat Mayling Armijo is still lagging  with  the collection of nominating petition signatures with 1,589 verified signatures collected or 53%, and she needs 1,411 more needed to get on the ballot which will be difficult at the pace she is going. (On May 30, Armijo had collected 1,084 or 36%.)

It can be said that  4 of the 11 candidates for Mayor will not collect the required 3,000 verified signatures to be placed on the ballot with 3having less than 15% of the required signatures and one with 29%Those candidates who will likely fail to collect the required 3,000 by June 21 to  get on the ballot are: Brian Feger with 3% collected, Apana Adair with 1% collected, Adeo Herrick with 1% collected and Patrick Sais with 29% collected.

The link to the City Clerk web page is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/vote/candidate-information/2025-candidates-and-committees-1/2025-petition-qualifying-contribution-tally

PROCESSED PUBLIC FINANCE QUALIFYING DONATIONS

Originally, there  only two candidates for Mayor declared that they were privately financed candidates: Daniel Chavez and Mayling Armijo.

Originally, 8 of the 11 candidates running for Mayor declared themselves  to be “public finance” candidates. The original 8 are Alpana Adair, Alexander Uballez, Darren White, Tim Keller, Louis Sanchez, Edie Varella, Patrick Sais and Adeo Herrick.

Five candidates have now withdrawn their application for public finance and are now considered privately financed candidates. The candidates who have withdrawn from public finance to become privately financed candidates are Alexander Uballez, Louis Sanchez, Alpana Adair,  Eddie Varela and Patrick Sais.  

The three candidates who are still declared public financed candidates are Tim Keller,  Darren White and Adeo Henrick.  

The single most difficult task for candidates who are publicly financed candidates is the collection of 3,780 qualifying donations of $5.00 each to secure $755,946 in city financing. The candidates were given from April 19, 2025 to June 21, 2025, a mere 64 days, to collect the 3,780 qualifying donations from registered Albuquerque voters.

The city clerks go through each one of the donations to confirm donor registration within the city limits. Audits are also conducted by the city clerk’s office where direct contact is made of donors to confirm the donation was made by the donor. If a candidate does not collect the full 3,780 qualifying donations, those donations collected revert to the city and not to a candidate’s campaign. The failing candidate to collect 3,780 qualifying donations can declare to be a private financed candidate and solicit private campaign donation funding until election day November 5.

The following are the processed public finance qualifying donations for the 3 candidates who remain publicly financed candidates as of Friday June 6 :

TIMOTHY KELLER

  • Required Qualifying Contributions                                                      3,780
  • Verified Qualifying Contributions                                                         3,040
  • Rejected Qualifying Contributions                                                         239
  • Remaining Qualifying Contributions Needed                                        740
  • Percentage of Verified Qualifying Contributions Met                     80%

DARREN WHITE

  • Required Qualifying Contributions                                                      3,780
  • Verified Qualifying Contributions                                                         2,000
  • Rejected Qualifying Contributions                                                          276
  • Remaining Qualifying Contributions Needed                                      1,780
  • Percentage of Verified Qaulifying Contributions Met                      53%

ADEO HERRICK

  • Required Qualifying Contributions                                                       3,780
  • Verified Qualifying Contributions                                                                6
  • Rejected Qualifying Contributions                                                            -0-
  • Remaining Qualifying Contributions Needed                                       3,774
  • Percentage of Verified Qualifying Contributions Met                        -0-%

The link to the City Clerk web page is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/vote/candidate-information/2025-candidates-and-committees-1/2025-petition-qualifying-contribution-tally

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS  ON PUBLIC FINANCE

Mayor Tim Keller is seeking a third term as Mayor and for the third time he is seeking public financing. As of June 6, Keller has collected 3,040 verified qualifying $5.00 donations or 80% and he still needs 740  donations to qualify for public finance or another 20%. With 15 days left in the collection period, Keller must collect an average of 49 donations per day plus an additional number to take into account disqualifications. The odds are high that Mayor Keller will be the only candidate who will qualify for public finance given the number of house parties his campaign has scheduled for that very purpose as well as public events scheduled for June.

The odds are high that Republican Darren White will NOT qualify for public finance. White has collected 2,000 qualifying donations or 53% of the required 3,780 and he needs at least 1,780 more $5.00 donations. With 15 days left in the collection period, White  must collect an average of 119 donations per day, plus an additional number to take into account city clerk rejected donations.

NEWS UPDATE:  On June 8, with no press announcement, former Bernalillo County Sherriff Darren White, became the sixth candidate to withdraw from public finance filing with the city clerk a withdrawal notice.

https://www.cabq.gov/clerk/documents/white-withdrawal-as-an-applicant-candidate.pdf

Adeo Herrick has collected 0% of the qualifying donations and 1% of the required nominating petition signatures and it is safe to assume that Herrick has likely given up his efforts to run for Mayor and has dropped out of the race.

FINAL COMMENT

The time frame to collect both nominating petition signatures and $5.00 qualifying contributions for public finance is the same and it is from April 19, 2025 to June 21, 2025.  On June 21, we will know for sure who has made the ballot and if Mayor Keller will be the only candidate who qualifies for public finance.

On June 21 the campaign for Mayor will begin in earnest with the election to be held on November 4. If no candidate secures 50% plus one of the vote, a run off will be scheduled within 30 days between the two top vote getters.

 

Trump Administration Withdraws Hit List Of 500 Sanctuary Jurisdictions; Abq, Santa Fe And 23 NM Counties Originally Included; Millions At Stake As Mayor Keller Makes Trump Issue In Mayor’s Race”

On April 28, President Trump signed Executive Order 14287 entitled Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens  to enforce federal law with respect to sanctuary jurisdictions to protect their citizens from what the Trump Administration calls “dangerous illegal aliens.”  According to the Trump Administration “sanctuary jurisdictions include cities, counties, and states that are deliberately and shamefully obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws endangering American communities. Sanctuary cities protect dangerous criminal aliens from facing consequences and put law enforcement in peril.”

The Trump administration has repeatedly targeted communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren’t doing enough to help Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as it seeks to make good on President Donald Trump’s campaign promises to remove millions of people from the country who are in the United States illegally. The Trump administration claims that sanctuary policies, including  local rules or ordinances that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, undermine the rule of law and endanger both residents and law enforcement officers.

The Executive  Order directs the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security to publish a list of States and local jurisdictions obstructing federal immigration law enforcement. They must notify each sanctuary jurisdiction of its non-compliance and provide them with an opportunity to correct it. Sanctuary jurisdictions that do not comply with federal law may lose federal funding. The list can be reviewed and changed at any time and will be updated regularly as jurisdictions come into compliance

The Executive  Order directs the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security to pursue all necessary legal remedies and enforcement measures to bring non-compliant jurisdictions into compliance. It instructs the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security to develop mechanisms for proper eligibility verification in sanctuary jurisdictions to prevent illegal aliens from receiving federal public benefits. The Department of Homeland Security is instructed that demands are to be made that these jurisdictions immediately review and revise their policies to align with Federal immigration laws and renew their obligation to protect American citizens, not dangerous illegal aliens.

There’s no specific or legal definition of what constitutes a “sanctuary jurisdiction.” The term is often used to refer to law enforcement agencies, states or communities that don’t cooperate with immigration enforcement. If “sanctuary jurisdictions” are notified and the Trump administration determines that they “remain in defiance,” the attorney general and the secretary of Homeland Security are then empowered to pursue whatever “legal remedies and enforcement measures” they consider necessary to make them comply.

The link to review the White House Fact sheet on the Executive Order is here:

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-protects-american-communities-from-criminal-aliens/

HIT LIST OF 500 ISSUED

On Thursday, May 29, the Trump administration released a list of more than 500 “sanctuary jurisdictions” across the country  accusing them of obstructing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The Department Of Homeland Security published the list of the jurisdictions and said each one will be notified that the federal  government has deemed them noncompliant with Trump’s Executive Order and if they’re believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes.

The list of 500  was compiled using several factors, including whether the cities or localities identified themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions, how much they complied already with federal officials enforcing immigration laws, if they had restrictions on sharing information with immigration enforcement or had any legal protections for people in the country illegally, according to the department.

The list of 500 was on the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) website and listed all states. The New Mexico list included the cities of  Albuquerque and Santa Fe, and 23 counties, which is over two thirds of the state. The list of New Mexico counties was as follows:

  1. Bernalillo County
  2. Chaves County
  3. Colfax County
  4. De Baca County
  5. Dona Ana County
  6. Eddy County
  7. Grant County
  8. Hidalgo County
  9. Lincoln County
  10. Los Alamos County
  11. Luna County
  12. McKinley County
  13. Otero County
  14. Quay County
  15. Rio Arriba County
  16. Roosevelt County
  17. San Juan County
  18. San Miguel County
  19. Sandoval County
  20. Santa Fe County
  21. Sierra County
  22. Socorro County
  23. Taos County

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said this of the list when it was first posted on the Homeland Security website:

“These sanctuary city politicians are endangering Americans and our law enforcement in order to protect violent criminal illegal aliens.”

The DHS said the list would be updated regularly and urges all named cities and counties to review and revise their policies to align with federal immigration laws. Under the new executive order, jurisdictions that remained in defiance after notification could face federal funding cuts or legal action.

HIT LIST WITHDRAWN BY DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY

On Sunday, June 1st  the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) took  down the list of counties and cities the federal government had claimed to be obstructing federal immigration law. The list was removed from the DHS website a day after a letter from the National Sheriff’s Association criticized it as an “unnecessary erosion of unity” between local and federal law enforcement.

The link to the original list is here https://www.dhs.gov/sanctuary-jurisdictions and it now states:

“Page Not Found

The page may have been moved, deleted, or is otherwise unavailable.

The letter from the National Sheriff’s Association demanded that DHS apologize to local law enforcement, rescind the list and release a detailed breakdown of why each jurisdiction was included. The National Sheriff’s Association letter read in part:

“The sheriffs of this country feel betrayed. … The completion and publication of this list has not only violated the core principles of trust, cooperation, and partnership with fellow law enforcement, but it also has the potential to strain the relationship between sheriffs and the White House administration.  … This decision by DHS could create a vacuum of trust that may take years to overcome.”

Kieran Donahue ,the president of the National Sheriffs’ Association, which represents more than 3,000 sheriffs nationwide, criticized the list in a statement. Donahue demanded an apology and that the list be removed.  Donahue accused DHS of doing “a terrible disservice to President Trump and the Sheriffs of this country.” Donahue said that in a meeting between his association and members of DHS “no political appointee for the administration could explain who compiled, proofed, and verified the list before publication.”

National Sheriffs’ Association President Sheriff Kieran Donahue told the NPR national news agency that the list was compiled without clear criteria or a way to contest designations, calling it “arbitrary”. Donahue said this:

“This list was created without any input, criteria of compliance, or a mechanism for how to object to the designation. Sheriffs nationwide have no way to know what they must do or not do to avoid this arbitrary label. This decision by DHS could create a vacuum of trust that may take years to overcome.”

The list caused widespread confusion, both in New Mexico and nationwide, as named jurisdictions grappled with the threat of funding cuts with little to no explanation as to why the federal government considered them “non-compliant.” The list is still nowhere to be found on the DHS website.

Asked by the CNN news agency why the list was removed, a senior DHS official said in a statement on June 2 that the list “is being constantly reviewed and can be changed at any time and will be updated regularly.” The statement did not respond to specific questions about how the list was created or who identified jurisdictions that would be included.

Twenty Three out of thirty-three New Mexican counties were targeted as sanctuary jurisdictions, including some rural counties that have enacted legislation supporting President Donald Trump’s immigration policies.  In southern New Mexico, Eddy County was listed non-compliant while neighboring Lea County was excluded from the list. Governor  Michelle Lujan Grisham’s office called the list “confusing” and asked for transparency from the federal government.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem doubled down during the Sunday morning talk show   Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures”, but did not acknowledge the list’s online erasure. Noem said this:

“Some of the cities have pushed back. … They think because they don’t have one law or another on the books that they don’t qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.”

Several jurisdictions on the DHS list said it does not accurately describe their policies. The city of Las Vegas said in a statement on X that it has never been a sanctuary city and is “not sure why DHS has classified Las Vegas in the manner it has.” Baltimore Mayor Brandon Scott said while his city is “welcoming,” it is not a sanctuary city. Several city officials in San Diego County said they were confused about being on the list including one mayor who told local media that officers are allowed to assist Immigration and Customs Enforcement in certain cases.

It is unclear when or if the list will be publicly re-released.

Links to relied upon or quoted news sources are here:

https://apnews.com/article/immigration-sanctuary-jurisdictions-list-a372c7501746e4f2b7e117ba22ebccac

https://www.police1.com/federal-law-enforcement/department-of-homeland-security-releases-list-of-cities-counties-labeled-as-sanctuary-jurisdictions

https://www.cnn.com/2025/06/02/politics/sanctuary-jurisdictions-list-dhs

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/article_d4862f0d-5c64-4dc7-b7e1-505c48e91f4a.html

ICE WANNTS LOCAL AND STATE HELP ON DETAINMENT

ICE enforces immigration laws nationwide. Often ICE seeks state and local help in alerting federal authorities of immigrants wanted for deportation and holding that person until federal officers take custody.

One way that the administration seeks to enlist state and local support is through 287(g) agreements with local law enforcement agencies. Those agreements allow local law enforcement agencies to assume some immigration enforcement duties and greatly expand ICE’s capabilities. The number of those agreements has skyrocketed in just a matter of months under the Trump administration.

ICE has about 6,000 law enforcement officers who are able to find, arrest and remove immigrants by targeting them. This is  a number that has remained largely static for years.  By relying on local law enforcement, it can quickly scale up the number of staff available to help carry out Trump’s mass deportations agenda.

Communities that don’t cooperate with ICE often say they do so because immigrants then feel safer coming forward if they’re a witness to or victim of a crime. And they argue that immigration enforcement is a federal task, and they need to focus their limited dollars on fighting crime.

“Sanctuary policies are legal and make us all safer,” said a coalition of local officials from across the country and a nonprofit called Public Rights Project in a statement. They said the list was a fear tactic designed to bully local governments into cooperating with ICE

IMMIGRANT FRIENDLY CITY VERSUS SANCTUARY CITY

Trump’s Executive Order instructs the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to compile a list of sanctuary jurisdictions across the United States, targeting them for potential cuts to federal funding.

It was in 2001, long before Trump was President, that the Albuquerque City Council declared the city to be an “Immigrant-Friendly City” by City Council ordinance. The ordinance was originally sponsored by former Republican City Councilor Hess Yntema who represented the South East Heights area, including the International District that has the highest concentration of immigrants. Councilor Yntema’s wife is also naturalized citizen of the United States. In 2018, Albuquerque passed amendments to the original ordinance affirming the city was an “immigrant-friendly city,” again carefully avoiding the term “sanctuary city.”

The ordinance provides that the City of Albuquerque “welcomes and encourages immigrants to live, work and study in Albuquerque and to participate in community affairs, and recognizes immigrants for their important contributions to our culture and economy.”

Former City Councilor Pat Davis, who co-authored the measure, said the distinction was deliberate. Davis said this:

“We were really clear about being sure that we didn’t use sanctuary language. …We wanted to ensure transparency and cooperation,  but also protect vulnerable residents.”

“Sanctuary City requires local government to essentially shield the undocumented from federal authorities and federal arrests. “Immigrant Friendly” cities on the other hand enact policies that are favorable to undocumented people to allow them city services like all other residents and its local law enforcement personnel do not make arrests for violations of federal immigration laws and only make arrests of undocumented people for violations of local ordinances and state laws.

 Albuquerque does allow the sharing of arrest records of municipal and state violations with federal immigration agents. However, the city does not compile any information on immigration status of suspects and prohibits Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from using municipal facilities or resources. This balance distinguishes the city’s approach from more overt sanctuary city policies

WHAT WILL BE AT STAKE

The stakes are high if  the Trump Administration goes through with  labeling  Albuquerque a sanctuary jurisdiction. The city would be at risk of losing more than $68 million in federal funding, roughly 5% of the city’s annual budget. The potential loss of funding includes:

  • $26 million for the Sunport and Double Eagle airports
  • $11 million for housing programs
  • $8 million for public transit
  • $6 million for the Albuquerque Police Department

The link to a quoted or relied upon news source is here:

https://www.koat.com/article/mayoral-candidates-divided-on-albuquerques-immigrant-friendly-status-amid-federal-funding-threats/64707080

KELLER MAKES TRUMP’S CUTS ISSUE IN MAYOR’S RACE

Mayor Tim Keller for his part is being very aggressive in taking on President Trump and his threats to cut federal funding to the city.

On Sunday, March 24, Mayor Tim Keller spoke to upwards of  250 people seated in the gymnasium at the city’s Monzano Mesa Multigenerational Center located two blocks South East of Central and near Costco. The event was billed as “DEFEND ABQ, Standing Strong For Families”.

The entire program was Mayor Tim Keller discussing and outlining in detail the impact Trump budget cuts and other actions taken by the Trump administration will have on the city.

Keller emphasized the need for “steady and experienced” leadership and said this:

“It’s real here. … It’s real in every city in America. That’s what is so terrible about this. … What they are doing is destroying every aspect of our community, including the business community. … These dangerous cuts are very real for every city in America and would have huge consequences for our families in Albuquerque. But this is not our first rodeo with Donald Trump, and we will keep fighting for our families and defend our city against anyone trying to tear us apart. … These potential cuts are, pure and simple, dangerous to our city. Regardless of our party or feelings about the White House, no one in Albuquerque is better off when kids go without child care, a crime lab is without officers, streets and neighborhoods are without trees, or seniors go without meals. …  Like during Trump’s first term and the COVID pandemic, I will use all the tools we have, create new ones, and work with local and state government partners to keep our city running. I will stand up for every resident as we prepare for what could be exceptionally tough times.”

Keller touched on topics ranging from budget cuts to immigration. Keller outlined Trump Administration major cuts that will affect the city services. The Trump cuts include federal affordable housing funding, cutting vouchers for the unhoused, and cutting funding for homeless shelters. Cuts to transportation include cutting federal funding for road improvements, bike lanes and trails, bus routes and for the city’s multimillion dollar “rail trail” development.

Keller noted that 39% of New Mexico families are enrolled in Medicare and the Trump Administration is talking about making cuts to the program. Keller noted that there are 44,000 New Mexicans who are employed by the Federal Government and how blanket layoffs are already occurring in the city and New Mexico.

Keller outlined how federal funding cuts will impact other areas including:

PUBLIC SAFETY: The city could see an impact to a number of areas in law enforcement including drug enforcement, crime fighting technology and a decrease in the size of the police force with federal funding for 50 police officers cut. Keller asked “Can you imagine how detrimental that would be, especially given the challenges we’re having with crime?

HOUSING: Trump federal  funding cuts will affect projects like the “Uptown Connect” project which is a federally funded mixed-use development that will replace the  the Uptown Transit Center. Included in the development are almost 200 affordable housing units. Keller said this: “We will never see it if Trump keeps doing what he’s doing.”

MINORITY BUSINESSES: Trump also issued an executive order laying out plans to eliminate government entities, including the Minority Business Development Agency.

One area Keller claimed the city is fighting back against Trump relates to “diversity, equality and inclusion” (DEI).  Keller said the city will continue promoting DEI as Trump tries to crackdown on DEI programs across the country. Keller pledged to continue with the city’s Office of Equity and Inclusion, the Office of Civil Rights, and the Office of Financial Empowerment, all 3 which Keller created, and continue with the city’s Climate Action Plan.

SANCTUARY CITY DEBATE BECOMES ISSUE IN MAYOR’S RACE A SECOND TIME

The divisive issue of Sanctuary City is not new to Albuquerque. In 2009, Mayor Richard Berry ran on a tough on crime and a tough-on-immigration platform and defeated incumbent Mayor Martin Chávez. Once in office, Berry allowed ICE to use city resources and operate out of the city’s prisoner transport center. The practice was reversed after Mayor Tim Keller took office in 2017.

Berry defended the policy of allowing ICE to utilize city resources at the time, saying it allowed local police to focus on public safety rather than immigration enforcement. Berry said this at the time:

“It keeps APD officers from doing immigration work, which is important while they’re fighting crime in the streets.”

In 2025, the accusation that the city of Albuquerque is a sanctuary city is once again becoming an issue in the race Mayor of Albuquerque as Mayor Tim Keller seeks a third 4 year term.

Republican Darren White is one of 11 candidates running for Mayor. White is the controversial former Cabinet Secretary of the Department of Public Safety for then Republican Governor Gary Johnson. White is a former two term Bernalillo County Sheriff and former Albuquerque Chief Public Safety Officer under Republican Mayor Richard Berry.

White is essentially running on the same platform Richard Berry used to defeat Mayor Marty Chavez. White proclaims himself  to be a “proven leader,” “tough on crime” and a “champion for change.” White asserts that there have been 660 murders during Keller’s years in office, that an alarming number of businesses have had to close down because of crime and that Keller has made Albuquerque a “sanctuary city.” White proclaims  in his announcement:

“Mayor Keller has presided over the most murders in Albuquerque’s history. His weak approach to crime and homelessness has failed and it’s time for change.”

In a fund-raising letter, White falsely proclaimed this:

“One of Keller’s first acts as Mayor was too make Albuquerque a Sanctuary City for illegal immigrants who commit crimes. Now we have case after case of violent crimes being committed by illegal immigrants, many of who have been arrested multiple times but turned back onto the streets by this Mayor’s backward policies. As Mayor, I will end the Sanctuary City law immediately.”

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Simply put, former APD Officer Darren White knows better, unless he flunked “Constitutional Law” at the APD Police Academy which is a real possibility given some of the things that come out of his mouth. White knows Keller has no  authority to simply “turn back onto the streets” people arrested for a violent crime as White claims, and White knows its the courts that makes such decisions following due process of law. He is using the issue of sanctuary city to “gin up” anti immigrant fever as Trump has done on the national level.

There is no doubt that crime and the city’s homeless crisis will be the two biggest issues in the 2025 Mayor’s race. If and when the Trump Administration declares Albuquerque to be a Sanctuary Jurisdiction, which is expected, it too will be a political flashpoint in the 2025 municipal elections where the Mayor and 5 City Council seats will be on the ballot.

Mayor Tim Keller has always  pushed back against the Trump administration’s efforts to label Albuquerque a “sanctuary city” and to withhold federal funding from cities with immigrant-friendly policies.  Keller’s position is that Albuquerque will remain an inclusive and immigrant-friendly city and will resist federal pressure to change its policies, viewing such pressure as detrimental to public safety and community well-being

The link to a related Dinelli article is here:

https://www.petedinelli.com/2025/05/14/stakes-are-high-to-answer-trumps-question-is-albuquerque-a-sanctuary-city-or-immigrant-friendly-city-sanctuary-city-becomes-issue-in-2025-mayors/

 

City Clerk Verifies Keller And Chavez Signatures To Make Mayoral Ballot; Only Keller Likely To Qualify For Public Finance; Uballez Abandons Public Finance; Impact Of Measured Finance Committees; Public Finance System Needs Major Reform

There are a total of 11 candidates who have registered with the City Clerk as candidates for Mayor. All 11 candidates are required to collect 3,000 qualifying nominating signatures.

Originally, 8 candidates applied for public finance, now there are 4 with the other 4 withdrawing their applications for public finance. Public financed candidates must collect 3,780 donations of $5.00 to the city from registered voters to qualify for the city to give them $755,946 in city financing for their campaigns.

The time frame to collect both nominating petition signatures and $5.00 qualifying contributions is the same and it is from April 19, 2025 to June 21, 2025, a mere 64 days. As of May 30, with 42 days expiring, there are only 22 days remaining to collect nominating petition signatures and $5.00 qualifying donations.

QUALIFYING NOMINATING PETITION SIGNATURES

All eleven candidates must collect at least 3,000 qualifying nominating petition signatures from April 19, 2025 to June 21, 2025, a mere 64 days. Each signature must come from registered voters in the Albuquerque area. City clerk’s go through each one of the signatures to confirm their registration. Candidates can challenge each other’s signatures for disqualification. The signatures of people who sign the nomination petitions and who are not actually registered voters are tossed and are not counted.

Daniel Chavez was the first to secure the required 3,000 signatures to get on the ballot followed by Mayor Tim Keller. The following are the processed qualifying nominating petition signatures for each of the 11 candidates as of Friday May 30 from the highest to lowest in tabulations:

DANIEL CHAVEZ

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                     3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                        3,422
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                      2,338
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                       -0-
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                    100% 

TIMOTHY KELLER

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                     3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                        3,424
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                         592
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                          -0-
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                     100%

ALEXANDER UBALLEZ

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                       3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                          2,680
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                           455
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                          320
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                         89%

EDDIE VARELA

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                        3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                          1,998
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                           485
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                        1,002
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                          67%

LOUIE SANCHEZ

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                        3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                           1,707
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                           396
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                         1,293
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                          57%

DARREN WHITE

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                         3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                            1,699
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                             150
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                         1,301
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                           57%

MAYLING ARMIJO

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                         3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                            1,084
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                            373
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                          1,916
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                           36%

PATRICK SAIS

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                           3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                                673
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                              670
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                           2,327
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                             22%

BRIAN FEJER

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                         3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                                77
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                              -0-
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                         2,923
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                             3%

ALPANA ADAIR

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                            3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                                   16
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                                19
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                            2,984
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                                1%

ADEO HERRICK

  • Required Petition Signatures                                                             3,000
  • Verified Petition Signatures                                                                    35
  • Rejected Petition Signatures                                                                  28
  • Remaining Petition Signatures Needed                                              2,965
  • Percentage of Verified Petition Signatures Met                                 1%

COMMENTARY AND ANALSIS ON QUALIFYING PETITION SIGNATURES

As of May 30, the City Clerk has verified 2 candidates have collected the required 3,000 qualifying nominating petition signatures over the 49 day period from April 19 to May 30. Democrat Mayor Tim Keller and Republican  Daniel Chavez secured 100% of the required verified qualifying petition signatures of 3,000.

Twenty two days, from May 30 to June 21, remain to collect the balance of the qualifying nominating petition signatures.

Democrat Alexander Uballez  will likely make the ballot with 2,680  verified petition signatures secured or 89%  and he needs  320  more verified.  On May 30, Uballez announced during a press conference that he has collected and turned in enough signatures to appear on the ballot. However, signatures recently collected must be verified by the City Clerk.

Republican Eddie Varela is on track to secure the required 3,000 signatures to get on the ballot with 1,998 signatures collected or 67%. Varela needs  1,002  more signatures which is doable with 22 days left in the collection process.

Democrat City Council Louie Sanchez is lagging somewhat to secure the 3,000 required signatures with 1,707 verified or 57%  and he needs 1,293 more signatures to get on the ballot but with 22 more days left in the collection process it still can be done.

Republican Darren White is lagging somewhat to secure the 3,000 required signatures having secured 1,699 or 57% with 150 rejected and needing 1,301 more signatures to get on the ballot but with 22 more days in the collection process it still can be done.

Democrat Mayling Armijo is seriously underwater with her collection of nominating petition signatures with 1,084  verified signatures collected or 36%, 373 were rejected and she needs 1,916 more needed to get on the ballot which will be difficult.

It appears  that 4 out of 11 candidates for Mayor will not collect the required 3,000 verified signatures to be placed on the ballot with 3 having less than 15% of the required signatures and one with 22%. Those candidates who will likely fail to get on the ballot are: Brian Feger with 3% collected, Alpana Adair with 1% collected, Adeo Herrick with 1% collected and  Patrick Sais with 22% collected.  There is an outside chance that Patrick Sais with  22% will make the ballot, but at the rate he is going, making the ballot is doubtful

The link to the City Clerk web page is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/vote/candidate-information/2025-candidates-and-committees-1/2025-petition-qualifying-contribution-tally

PROCESSED PUBLIC FINANCE QUALIFYING DONATIONS

The single most difficult task for candidates who are publicly financed candidates is the collection of 3,780 qualifying donations of $5.00 each to secure $755,946 in city financing. The candidates are given from April 19, 2025 to June 21, 2025, a mere 64 days, to collect the 3,780 qualifying donations from registered Albuquerque voters.

The city clerks go through each one of the donations to confirm donor registration within the city limits. Audits are also conducted by the city clerk’s office where direct contact is made of donors to confirm the donation was made by the donor. If a candidate does not collect the full 3,780 qualifying donations, those donations collected revert to the city and not to a candidate’s campaign. The failing  candidate to collect 3,780 qualifying donations can declare to be a privately finance candidate and solicit private campaign donation funding until election day November 5.

Originally, seven of the eleven candidates running for Mayor were “public financed” candidates:  Alpana Adair, Alexander Uballez, Darren White, Tim Keller, Louis Sanchez, Edie Varella and Adeo Herrick.  Four candidates have withdrawn their application for public finance and are now considered privately financed candidates: Alpana Adair,  Alexander Uballez, Eddie Varela and Patrick Sais.  The four candidates who are still declared public financed candidates are: Tim Keller, Darren White, Louis Sanchez and Adeo Henrick.  

The following are the processed public finance qualifying donations for the 4 candidates who remain publicly financed candidates as of Friday May 30:

 TIMOTHY KELLER

  • Required Qualifying Contributions                                                       3,780
  • Verified Qualifying Contributions                                                          2,614
  • Rejected Qualifying Contributions                                                           190
  • Remaining Qualifying Contributions Needed                                        1,163
  • Percentage of Verified Qualifying Contributions Met                        69%

DARREN WHITE

  • Required Qualifying Contributions                                                       3,780
  • Verified Qualifying Contributions                                                          1,471
  • Rejected Qualifying Contributions                                                            26
  • Remaining Qualifying Contributions Needed                                       2,309
  • Percentage of Verified Qualifying Contributions Met                        39%

LOUIE SANCHEZ

  • Required Qualifying Contributions                                                        3,780
  • Verified Qualifying Contributions                                                             661
  • Rejected Qualifying Contributions                                                            70
  • Remaining Qualifying Contributions Needed                                        3,119
  • Percentage of Verified Qualifying Contributions Met                       17%

 ADEO HERRICK

  • Required Qualifying Contributions                                                         3,780
  • Verified Qualifying Contributions                                                                  6
  • Rejected Qualifying Contributions                                                              -0-
  • Remaining Qualifying Contributions Needed                                          3,774
  • Percentage of Verified Qualifying Contributions Met                            0%

The link to the City Clerk web page is here:

https://www.cabq.gov/vote/candidate-information/2025-candidates-and-committees-1/2025-petition-qualifying-contribution-tally

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS  ON PUBLIC FINANCE

Mayor Tim Keller is seeking a third term as Mayor and for the third time he is seeking public financing.  As of May 30, Keller has collected 2,617 verified qualifying $5.00 donations or 69% and he still needs 1,163 donations to qualify for public finance. With 22 days left in the collection period, Keller must collect an average of 53 donations a day, plus an additional number to take into account disqualifications. The odds are high that Mayor Keller will be the only candidate who will qualify for public finance given the number of house parties his campaign has scheduled for that very purpose as well as public events scheduled for June.

The odds are high that Republican Darren White will NOT qualify for public finance. White has collected 1,471 qualifying donations or 39% of the required 3,780 and he needs at least 2,309 more $5.00 donations. With 22 days left in the collection period, White  must collect an average of 105 donations per day, plus an additional number to take into account city clerk rejected donations.

The odds are extremely high that Democrat City Councilor Louie Sanchez will NOT qualify for public finance. Sanchez has collected a mere 661 qualifying donations or 17% of the required 3,780 and he needs at least 3,119 more $5.00 donations. With 22 days left in the collection period, Sanchez  must collect an average of 142 donations per day, plus an additional number to take into account city clerk rejected donations.

Adeo Herrick has collected 0% of the qualifying donations and 1% of the required nominating petition signatures and it is safe to assume Herrick will not qualify for the ballot nor public finance.

UBALLEZ ABRUPLTY ABANDONS PUBLIC FINANCE

On May 30, Alexander Uballez abruptly ended his efforts to seek public finance. He is the fourth candidate out of eight who applied to abandon his efforts to collect 3,780 qualifying donations to the city to secure public finance of $755,946.  According to the City Clerk’s website, as of May 30, Uballez collected 812 contributions or 21% of the 3,780 donations before withdrawing.

In a news conference on May 30,  Uballez  eviscerated the city’s  public finance system  saying it favors incumbents and well-established candidates over those with less political support and name identification.  Uballez said this:

“I’m the fourth candidate to make this decision. When the only candidate who appears on track to qualify for public financing is the incumbent, it’s a clear sign that this isn’t working as it should. … However, I am too encouraged by the people already supporting our campaign, the volunteers who have worked so hard, and the surge we’re witnessing to do anything but keep moving forward. The people of Albuquerque deserve a better choice than candidates who can buy their way onto the ballot or use entrenched political power to get there. The people of Albuquerque want change to make our city safer and stronger and I will officially be their candidate in November.”

“The idealist in me, which has always driven my every decision, said, ‘Yeah, this thing, [public finance] makes sense, this thing I believe in. And you know what, I think I can hit it.’ But the reality of campaigning, as I’ve learned over the past five weeks, is that it’s quite a tall order. … I still believe in public financing. … I think how it’s currently structured, and maybe the goals you have to attain, reward those with political connections and close the door on political newcomers like myself.”

The links to quoted or relied upon news source is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/article_5d5551fb-023c-4367-a7f5-429a96917917.html#tncms-source=home-featured-7-block

Uballez  and other critics of the city’s public finance system have said that following the rules surrounding the $5 collections process is like running an impossible obstacle course. The qualifying period to collect both the 3,000 nominating petition signatures and the 3,780 $5.00 qualifying donations from registered voters is a 64-day period between April 19 and June 21.

OTHER CANDIDATES LASH OUT

Alpana Adair withdrew after collecting only seven verified $5.00 contributions, Patrick Sais withdrew after collecting only two, and Eddie Varela withdrew after collecting 95 of the 3,685 donations or 3%. Varela had this to say:

“I was of the belief that [public finance] would help just a regular guy or gal run for office and would be a great benefit to everybody. … I don’t believe that anymore. I believe it’s flawed, and it needs to be revisited.”

Varella said Mayor Tim Keller’s name recognition, combined with his built in campaign volunteer organization and established relationships with nonprofits who do business with the city, gives Mayor Keller  the advantage when it comes to collecting contributions.

Democrat City Councilor Louie Sanchez and Republican former Bernalillo County Sherriff Darren White are both seeking public financing, but that too may end sooner rather than later with both also lashing out at the public finance process.

Former Bernalillo County Sherriff Darren White said this:

“The only person who has qualified for it in the past two elections is Tim Keller. And so what does that tell you? It tells you that the system is, as I said, it’s an incumbent protection plan.”

White said he is sticking with public financing for now.  According to the City Clerk’s candidate’s web page, White has collected 1,471 qualifying $5,00 donations or 39% of the 3,780 donations needed to secure public finance.

City Councilor Louis Sanchez  said he was considering withdrawing from public financing and would take the weekend to decide.  As of May 30, Sanchez has collected 661 qualifying $5,00 donations or 17% of the 3,780 donations needed to secure public finance.  Sanchez said this:

“There’s a very, very good chance that I may opt out too.”

KELLER RESPONDS TO CRITICS

In a statement, Keller took issue with his opponents’ claims that the public finance rules favor incumbents. The Keller campaign said qualifying for public financing isn’t supposed to be easy. Keller said this in a statement:

“Complaining that public financing doesn’t work is like blaming the ref because you can’t hit your free throws — it’s not the system’s fault you’re falling short. The real issue isn’t the rules; it’s a lack of grassroots support, campaign credibility, and the organizational strength to lead.”

Keller’s statement notes that public financing was one of Albuquerque’s most critical democratic reforms, keeping campaigns focused on voters rather than big donors or special interests.

The link to the relied upon or quoted news source is here:

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/article_5d5551fb-023c-4367-a7f5-429a96917917.html#tncms-source=home-featured-7-block

2021 MAYOR’S RACE RECALLED

In 2021, Mayor Keller ran against former Sherriff Manny Gonzales and Republican Radio Talk Show host Eddie Aragon.  Mayor Tim Keller  successfully collected more than the then required 3,779 qualifying $5.00 donations collecting 3,945 and his campaign was given $661,309.25  in public financing. Keller was the only candidate to receive public financing after the city clerk rejected Manny Gonzales’ public financing bid.  The clerk’s office found that Gonzales forged voter signatures and donations, something Gonzales denied having a personal connection to. Keller’s other challenger, Eddy Aragon, relied on private financing.

2017 MEASURED FINANCE COMMITTEES SUPPORTING KELLER

Keller was  first elected Mayor in 2017 when he was a very popular State Auditor. Originally there were 16 candidates for Mayor, with only 8 candidates who secured the number of qualifying nominating signatures to be placed on the ballot. Under the election code ordinance at the time, all candidates for Mayor were given three months to collect nominating petition signatures from registered voters, but only six (6) weeks to secure the 3,000 required number of $5.00 qualifying donations for public finance.

It was a crowded field of 8 candidates who qualified for the ballot by collecting the required number of signatures. Keller was the only candidate in 2017 election that qualified for public finance. The Keller campaign collected the needed qualifying cash donations of $5 to the City of Albuquerque from registered voters over a six-week period.

Keller proclaimed he was “walking the talk” to keep big money out of the Mayor’s race by qualifying for public finance. Once qualified, the Keller for Mayor campaign was given a total of $506,254 in public financing allowed at the time, which included financing for the first election and separate financing for the runoff. As a condition to receive public financing from the City, Tim Keller agreed in writing to a spending cap not to exceed the amount given and agree not to raise and spend any more cash to finance his campaign.

Although Keller proclaimed he was “walking the talk” by being a public finance candidate to keep big donors as arm’s length, it was a false narrative and a political facade. Keller supporters realized that more would be needed to elect Keller. Supporters formed three (3) measured finance committees that either raised money directly to spend on his behalf or indirectly spent money and supported Keller’s candidacy for Mayor financially. No other candidate for Mayor in 2017 had a measured finance committee raising or spending on their behalf.

ABQ Forward Together was a measured finance committee that was formed specifically to raise money to promote Tim Keller for Mayor in 2017. The measured finance committee raised over $663,000 for Keller. ABQ Forward Together was chaired by longtime political consultant Nerie Olguin a former campaign consultant for Mr. Keller when he ran successfully for New Mexico State Senate. $67,000 was raised and spent by the Firefighters political action committee known as ABQFIREPAC for Tim Keller. $122,000 was raised and spent by ABQ Working Families on Tim Keller’s behalf.

In 2017, a whopping $1,358,254 was spent on Tim Keller’s successful campaign for Mayor. ($506,254 public finance money + $663,000 ABQ Forward + $67,000 ABQFIREPAC + $122,000 ABQ Working Families = $1,358,254.)

In the 2017 Mayor’s race, there was no other candidate that had measured finance committees that raised and spent money on their behalf. Republican City Councilor Dan Lewis, who made it into the runoff with Tim Keller, raised more than $847,000 combined in cash and in-kind contributions for the October election and the November Mayoral runoff election.

Democrat Brian Colón raised and spent nearly $824,000 for his unsuccessful mayoral run and came in third. Republican Wayne Johnson privately raised and spent approximately $250,000. Republican Ricardo Chavez financed his own campaign by contributing and loaning his campaign $1 million dollars, but when he dropped out of the race, all of the money was repaid to him after he spent approximately $200,000. The remaining three (3) candidates for Mayor raised and spent less than $50,000 combined after failing to qualify for public financing

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

The city’s public financing system is supposedly designed to reduce the influence of large donors in local elections, but that is simply a FALSE narrative with the existence of measured finance committees that can raise unlimited amounts of money and spend it on promoting a candidate.

MEASURED FINANCE COMMITEES FOR 2025 MUNICIPAL ELEXCTION

Under the City of Albuquerque’s campaign finance laws, a Measure Finance Committee (MFC) is a political action committee (PAC), person or group that supports or opposes a candidate or ballot measure within the City of Albuquerque. Measure Finance Committees are required to register with the City Clerk. Measure finance committees are not bound by the individual contribution limits and business bans like candidates. No Measure Finance Committee is supposed to coordinate their activities with the individual candidates running for office, but this is a very gray area as to what constitutes coordination of activities, and it is difficult to enforce.

The fact that measure finance committees are not bound by the individual contribution limits and business bans like candidates is what makes them a major threat to warping and influencing our municipal elections and the outcome. Any Measure Finance Committee can raise and spend unlimited amounts of money and can produce negative ads to destroy any candidate’s reputation and candidacy.

All Measure Finance Committees must register with the Albuquerque City Clerk, regardless of the group’s registration as a political action committee (PAC) with another governmental entity, county, state or federal. Measure finance committees must also file financial “Campaign Finance Reports” reporting monetary contributions, loans, in kind donations and expenditures. Under existing law, it is illegal for any candidate for office or their campaign committee to coordinate their campaign efforts with any measured finance committee.

In the 2025 municipal election, four measured finance Committees have been formed thus far and are registered with the City Clerk. They are:

  1. SAFER ALBUQUERQUE COMMITTEE (SAFER ABQ) formed for the purpose “To advocate for Mayling Armijo’s candidacy for mayor during the Albuquerque 2025 mayoral race and align with values that reduce crime, reduce homelessness, and promote job growth.”

https://campaignfinance.cabq.gov/#/exploreCommitteeDetail/M3FjOgNU2Z3h9u5VXBTrEgpRrh19RviUIoO4CmCWDAE1/null/null/2/2025

  1. ASCEND ALBUQUERQUE formed for the purpose To support the election of Tim Keller as Mayor of Albuquerque.”

https://campaignfinance.cabq.gov/#/exploreCommitteeDetail/VMQvJiHXaP1z-Iz2eL_papP4048PFnxLXRUfdOLcQk01/null/null/2/2025

  1. ABQ For All formed for the purpose “To educate and advocate for or against candidates for City Council”

https://campaignfinance.cabq.gov/#/exploreCommitteeDetail/kfkMONlVQnqqDLwSKTLYnJP4048PFnxLXRUfdOLcQk01/null/null/2/2025

  1. CIPGAW: Committee to Elect Eddie Varela Mayor of Albuquerque formed for the purpose to “Elect Eddie Varela Mayor of Albuquerque.

https://campaignfinance.cabq.gov/#/exploreCommitteeDetail/feXJuXAYkFJVGJBhl95rMZP4048PFnxLXRUfdOLcQk01/null/null/2/2025

DIRE NEED FOR REFORM TO PUBLIC FINANCE LAWS

The fact that only one candidate for Mayor will likely qualify for public finance this election year is clear evidence that the system has been set up for candidates to fail, that is why so few candidates for Mayor will qualify for public finance. The system favors incumbents such as Mayor Tim Keller who have high name identification and built in campaign organizations and staff  and who holds two and three press conferences a day.

Some have argued it is a system that is supposed to be hard to “weed out” candidates who are incapable of mounting serious campaigns. But making it so hard that no one qualifies makes it a mockery of the purpose and intent of public finance which is to encourage qualified people to run who can not afford to run and who are not independently wealthy.

The deficiencies in the city’s public financing have been repeatedly warned about over the last 14 years but have been ignored. Some of the changes advocated is reducing the number of qualifying donations to a more realistic number as well as increasing the time to collect the qualifying donations. Simply put, public finance laws should not be set up to make it too difficult to qualify for public financing and should have sufficient safeguards to police and prevent fraud.

The following changes to the City’s public finance and election are in order:

  • Double the amount of time from 64 days to 128 days to collect both the qualifying donations and petition signatures, and private campaign donation collection.
  • Reduce the number of $5.00 qualifying donations of 3,780 to equal the number of nominating petition signatures of 3,000. Simply put, many voters loath making political donations of any kind.
  • Allow the collection of the qualifying donations from anyone who wants, and not just residents or registered voters of Albuquerque. Privately finance candidates now can collect donations from anyone they want and anywhere in the State and Country.
  • Once the allowed number of qualifying donations is collected, the public financing would immediately be made available, but not allowed to be spent until the date of closure of the collection process.
  • Permit campaign spending for both publicly financed and privately financed candidates only from the date of closure of the collection process to the November election day.
  • Return to candidates for their use in their campaign any qualifying donations the candidate has collected when the candidate fails to secure the required number of qualifying donations to get the public financing.
  • Mandate the City Clerk to issue debit card or credit card collection devices to collect the qualifying donations and to issue receipts and eliminate the mandatory use of “paper receipts”. Continue to allow the collection of both nominating petition signature and $5.00 donations “on line.”
  • Increase from $1.00 to $2.50 per registered voter the amount of public financing, which will be approximately $900,000, and allow for incremental increases of 10% every election cycle keeping up with inflation.
  • Allow additional matching public financing available for run offs at the rate of $1.25 per registered voter, or $450,000.
  • Albuquerque should make every effort to make municipal elections partisan elections to be held along with State and Federal elections by seeking a constitutional amendment from the legislature to be voted upon by the public.
  • Any money raised and spent by measured finance committees on behalf a candidate should be required to first be applied to reimburse the City for any taxpayer money advanced to a public finance candidate or deducted from a publicly finance candidates account and returned to the city.
  • City of Albuquerque campaign reporting and finance ordinances and regulations need to define with absolute clarity that strictly prohibit the coordination of expenditures and campaign activities with measured finance committees and individual candidate’s campaigns in municipal elections.
  • A mandatory schedule of fines and penalties for violations of the code of ethics and campaign practices act should be enacted by the City Council.

CONCLUSION

Until there is real reform of public finance laws, we can continue to expect only one or two candidates, especially incumbents, to qualify for public financing in elections for Mayor and giving the incumbent the advantage.

Albuquerque, Santa Fe, 23 New Mexico Counties On Trump’s Hit List Of 500 Sanctuary Jurisdictions; Millions In Federal Funding Could Be Withheld; Mayor Keller Defiant, Making Trump Issue In Mayor’s Race

On April 28, President Trump signed Executive Order 14287 entitled Protecting American Communities from Criminal Aliens  to enforce federal law with respect to sanctuary jurisdictions to protect their citizens from what the Trump Administration calls “dangerous illegal aliens.”  According to the Trump Administration “sanctuary jurisdictions include cities, counties, and states that are deliberately and shamefully obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws endangering American communities. Sanctuary cities protect dangerous criminal aliens from facing consequences and put law enforcement in peril.”

The Trump administration has repeatedly targeted communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren’t doing enough to help Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) as it seeks to make good on President Donald Trump’s campaign promises to remove millions of people in the country illegally. The Trump administration claims that sanctuary policies, including  local rules or ordinances that limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities, undermine the rule of law and endanger both residents and law enforcement officers.

The Executive Order directs the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security to publish a list of States and local jurisdictions obstructing federal immigration law enforcement. They must notify each sanctuary jurisdiction of its non-compliance and provide them with an opportunity to correct it. Sanctuary jurisdictions that do not comply with federal law may lose federal funding. The list can be reviewed and changed at any time and will be updated regularly as jurisdictions come into compliance

The Executive  Order directs the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security to pursue all necessary legal remedies and enforcement measures to bring non-compliant jurisdictions into compliance. It instructs the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security to develop mechanisms for proper eligibility verification in sanctuary jurisdictions to prevent illegal aliens from receiving federal public benefits. The Department of Homeland Security is instructed to make demands on  jurisdictions to immediately review and revise their policies to align with Federal immigration laws and renew their obligation to protect American citizens, not dangerous illegal aliens.

There’s no specific or legal definition of what constitutes a “sanctuary jurisdiction.” The term is often used to refer to law enforcement agencies, states or communities that don’t cooperate with immigration enforcement. If “sanctuary jurisdictions” are notified and the Trump administration determines that they “remain in defiance,” the attorney general and the secretary of Homeland Security are then empowered to pursue whatever “legal remedies and enforcement measures” they consider necessary to make them comply.

https://www.whitehouse.gov/fact-sheets/2025/04/fact-sheet-president-donald-j-trump-protects-american-communities-from-criminal-aliens/

HIT LIST OF 500 ISSUED

On Thursday, May 29, the Trump administration released the list of more than 500 “sanctuary jurisdictions” across the country, accusing them of obstructing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). The Department Of Homeland Security published the list of the jurisdictions and said each one will be notified that the federal government has deemed them noncompliant with Trump’s Executive Order and if they’re believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was published on the department’s website.

The list of 500  was compiled using several factors, including whether the cities or localities identified themselves as sanctuary jurisdictions, how much they complied already with federal officials enforcing immigration laws, if they had restrictions on sharing information with immigration enforcement or had any legal protections for people in the country illegally, according to the department.

DHS Secretary Kristi Noem said this of the list in a statement posted to the Homeland Security website:

“These sanctuary city politicians are endangering Americans and our law enforcement in order to protect violent criminal illegal aliens.”

The DHS said the list will be updated regularly and urges all named cities and counties to review and revise their policies to align with federal immigration laws. Under the new executive order, jurisdictions that remain in defiance after notification could face federal funding cuts or legal action.

NEW MEXICO COUNTIES AND CITIES

The list of 500 are on the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) website and lists all states. By clicking on the states individually, the list of counties and cities in the states are provided. The list features  the cities of  Albuquerque and Santa Fe, and 23 counties, which is over  two thirds of the state. There are 33 counties in New Mexico. The list of New Mexico counties are as follows:

New Mexico Counties

  1. Bernalillo County
  2. Chaves County
  3. Colfax County
  4. De Baca County
  5. Dona Ana County
  6. Eddy County
  7. Grant County
  8. Hidalgo County
  9. Lincoln County
  10. Los Alamos County
  11. Luna County
  12. McKinley County
  13. Otero County
  14. Quay County
  15. Rio Arriba County
  16. Roosevelt County
  17. San Juan County
  18. San Miguel County
  19. Sandoval County
  20. Santa Fe County
  21. Sierra County
  22. Socorro County
  23. Taos County

New Mexico Cities

  1. Albuquerque
  2. Santa Fe

The link to review the entire hit list of 500 of alleged sanctuary jurisdictions is here:

https://www.dhs.gov/sanctuary-jurisdictions

ICE WANNTS LOCAL AND STATE HELP ON DETAINMENT

ICE enforces immigration laws nationwide. Often ICE seeks state and local help in alerting federal authorities of immigrants wanted for deportation and holding that person until federal officers take custody.

One way that the Trump  administration seeks to enlist state and local support is through 287(g) agreements with local law enforcement agencies. Those agreements allow local law enforcement agencies to assume some immigration enforcement duties and greatly expand ICE’s capabilities. The number of those agreements has skyrocketed in just a matter of months under the Trump administration.

ICE has about 6,000 law enforcement officers who are able to find, arrest and remove immigrants by targeting them. This is  a number that has remained largely static for years.  By relying on local law enforcement, it can quickly scale up the number of staff available to help carry out Trump’s mass deportations agenda.

Communities that don’t cooperate with ICE often say they do so because immigrants then feel safer coming forward if they’re a witness to or victim of a crime. And they argue that immigration enforcement is a federal task, and they need to focus their limited dollars on fighting crime.

“Sanctuary policies are legal and make us all safer,” said a coalition of local officials from across the country and a nonprofit called Public Rights Project in a statement. They said the list was a fear tactic designed to bully local governments into cooperating with ICE.

The link to a relied upon or quoted news source in part  is here:

https://apnews.com/article/us-immigration-trump-sanctuary-cities-list-public-ebfd1c9bedaad73a145932d2247af8de

IMMIGRANT FRIENDLY CITY VERSUS SANCTUARY CITY

Trump’s Executive Order instructs the departments of Justice and Homeland Security to compile a list of sanctuary jurisdictions across the United States, targeting them for potential cuts to federal funding.

It was in 2001, long before Trump was President, that the Albuquerque City Council declared the city to be an “Immigrant-Friendly City” by City Council ordinance. The ordinance was originally sponsored by former Republican City Councilor Hess Yntema who represented the South East Heights area, including the International District that has the highest concentration of immigrants. Councilor Yntema’s wife is also naturalized citizen of the United States. In 2018, Albuquerque passed amendments to the original ordinance affirming the city was an “immigrant-friendly city,” again carefully avoiding the term “sanctuary city.”

The ordinance provides that the City of Albuquerque “welcomes and encourages immigrants to live, work and study in Albuquerque and to participate in community affairs, and recognizes immigrants for their important contributions to our culture and economy.”

Former City Councilor Pat Davis, who co-authored the measure, said the distinction was deliberate. Davis said this:

“We were really clear about being sure that we didn’t use sanctuary language. …We wanted to ensure transparency and cooperation,  but also protect vulnerable residents.”

“Sanctuary City requires local government to essentially shield the undocumented from federal authorities and federal arrests. “Immigrant Friendly” cities on the other hand enact policies that are favorable to undocumented people to allow them city services like all other residents and its local law enforcement personnel do not make arrests for violations of federal immigration laws and only make arrests of undocumented people for violations of local ordinances and state laws.

Albuquerque does allow the sharing of arrest records of municipal and state violations with federal immigration agents. However, the city does not compile any information on immigration status of suspects and prohibits Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from using municipal facilities or resources. This balance distinguishes the city’s approach from more overt sanctuary city policies

WHAT’S AT STAKE

The stakes are high now that the  Trump Administration has labeled Albuquerque a sanctuary jurisdiction. The city now is at risk of losing more than $68 million in federal funding, roughly five percent of the city’s annual budget. The potential loss of funding includes:

  • $26 million for the Sunport and Double Eagle airports
  • $11 million for housing programs
  • $8 million for public transit
  • $6 million for the Albuquerque Police Department

The link to a quoted or relied upon news source is here:

https://www.koat.com/article/mayoral-candidates-divided-on-albuquerques-immigrant-friendly-status-amid-federal-funding-threats/64707080

KELLER MAKES TRUMP’S CUTS ISSUE IN MAYOR’S RACE

Mayor Tim Keller for his part is being very aggressive in taking on President Trump and his threats to cut federal funding to the city.

On Sunday, March 24, Mayor Tim Keller spoke to upwards of  250 people seated in the gymnasium at the city’s Monzano Mesa Multigenerational Center located two blocks South East of Central and near Costco. The event was billed as “DEFEND ABQ, Standing Strong For Families”.

The entire program was Mayor Tim Keller discussing and outlining in detail the impact Trump budget cuts and other actions taken by the Trump administration will have on the city.

Keller emphasized the need for “steady and experienced” leadership and said this:

“It’s real here. … It’s real in every city in America. That’s what is so terrible about this. … What they are doing is destroying every aspect of our community, including the business community. … These dangerous cuts are very real for every city in America and would have huge consequences for our families in Albuquerque. But this is not our first rodeo with Donald Trump, and we will keep fighting for our families and defend our city against anyone trying to tear us apart. … These potential cuts are, pure and simple, dangerous to our city. Regardless of our party or feelings about the White House, no one in Albuquerque is better off when kids go without child care, a crime lab is without officers, streets and neighborhoods are without trees, or seniors go without meals. …  Like during Trump’s first term and the COVID pandemic, I will use all the tools we have, create new ones, and work with local and state government partners to keep our city running. I will stand up for every resident as we prepare for what could be exceptionally tough times.”

Keller touched on topics ranging from budget cuts to immigration. Keller outlined Trump Administration major cuts that will affect the city services. The Trump cuts include federal affordable housing funding, cutting vouchers for the unhoused, and cutting funding for homeless shelters. Cuts to transportation include cutting federal funding for road improvements, bike lanes and trails, bus routes and for the city’s multimillion dollar “rail trail” development.

Keller noted that 39% of New Mexico families are enrolled in Medicare and the Trump Administration is talking about making cuts to the program. Keller noted that there are 44,000 New Mexicans who are employed by the Federal Government and how blanket layoffs are already occurring in the city and New Mexico.

Keller outlined how federal funding cuts will impact other areas including:

PUBLIC SAFETY: The city could see an impact to a number of areas in law enforcement including drug enforcement, crime fighting technology and a decrease in the size of the police force with federal funding for 50 police officers cut. Keller asked “Can you imagine how detrimental that would be, especially given the challenges we’re having with crime?

HOUSING: Trump federal  funding cuts will affect projects like the “Uptown Connect” project which is a federally funded mixed-use development that will replace the  the Uptown Transit Center. Included in the development are almost 200 affordable housing units. Keller said this: “We will never see it if Trump keeps doing what he’s doing.”

MINORITY BUSINESSES: Trump also issued an executive order laying out plans to eliminate government entities, including the Minority Business Development Agency.

One area Keller claimed the city is fighting back against Trump relates to “diversity, equality and inclusion” (DEI).  Keller said the city will continue promoting DEI as Trump tries to crackdown on DEI programs across the country. Keller pledged to continue with the city’s Office of Equity and Inclusion, the Office of Civil Rights, and the Office of Financial Empowerment, all 3 which Keller created, and continue with the city’s Climate Action Plan.

SANCTUARY CITY DEBATE BECOMES ISSUE IN MAYOR’S RACE A SECOND TIME

The divisive issue of Sanctuary City is not new to Albuquerque. In 2009, Mayor Richard Berry ran on a tough on crime and a tough-on-immigration platform and defeated incumbent Mayor Martin Chávez. Once in office, Berry allowed ICE to use city resources and operate out of the city’s prisoner transport center. The practice was reversed after Mayor Tim Keller took office in 2017.

Berry defended the policy of allowing ICE to utilize city resources at the time, saying it allowed local police to focus on public safety rather than immigration enforcement. Berry said this at the time:

“It keeps APD officers from doing immigration work, which is important while they’re fighting crime in the streets.”

In 2025, the accusation that the city of Albuquerque is a sanctuary city is once again becoming an issue in the race Mayor of Albuquerque as Mayor Tim Keller seeks a third 4 year term.

Republican Darren White is one of 11 candidates running for Mayor.  White is the controversial former Cabinet Secretary of the Department of Public Safety for then Republican Governor Gary Johnson. White is a former two term Bernalillo County Sheriff and former Albuquerque Chief Public Safety Officer under Republican Mayor Richard Berry.

White is essentially running on the same platform Richard Berry used to defeat Mayor Marty Chavez. White proclaims himself  to be a “proven leader,” “tough on crime” and a “champion for change.” White asserts that there have been 660 murders during Keller’s years in office, that an alarming number of businesses have had to close down because of crime and that Keller has made Albuquerque a “sanctuary city.” White proclaims  in his announcement:

“Mayor Keller has presided over the most murders in Albuquerque’s history. His weak approach to crime and homelessness has failed and it’s time for change.”

In a fund-raising letter, White falsely proclaimed this:

“One of Keller’s first acts as Mayor was too make Albuquerque a Sanctuary City for illegal immigrants who commit crimes. Now we have case after case of violent crimes being committed by illegal immigrants, many of who have been arrested multiple times but turned back onto the streets by this Mayor’s backward policies. As Mayor, I will end the Sanctuary City law immediately.”

EDITOR’S COMMENTARY: Simply put, former APD Officer Darren White knows better, unless he flunked “Constitutional Law” at the APD Police Academy which is a real possibility given some of the things that come out of his big mouth. White knows Keller has no authority to simply “turned back onto the streets” people arrested for a violent crime as White claims and White knows its the courts that makes such decisions following due process of law. He is using the issue of sanctuary city to “gin up” anti immigrant fever as Trump has done on the national level. 

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

Mayor Tim Keller has always  pushed back against the Trump administration’s efforts to label Albuquerque a “sanctuary city” and to withhold federal funding from cities with immigrant-friendly policies.  Keller’s position is that Albuquerque will remain an inclusive and immigrant-friendly city and will resist federal pressure to change its policies, viewing such pressure as detrimental to public safety and community well-being.

There is no doubt that crime and the city’s homeless crisis will be the two biggest issues in the 2025 Mayor’s race. Now that the Trump Administration has declared Albuquerque to be a Sanctuary Jurisdiction, it too will be a political flashpoint in the 2025 municipal elections where the Mayor and 5 City Council seats will be on the ballot.

The link to a related Dinelli article is here:

https://www.petedinelli.com/2025/05/14/stakes-are-high-to-answer-trumps-question-is-albuquerque-a-sanctuary-city-or-immigrant-friendly-city-sanctuary-city-becomes-issue-in-2025-mayors/

New Mexico US Attorney Ellison And FBI Fail To Make It Clear Prosecutions Will Continue In The Largest Bribery And Corruption Scandal In City’s History Involving State’s 3 Largest Law Enforcement Agencies; Public Has Right To Know

The federal bribery and conspiracy case to dismiss DWI cases is as corrupt and scandalous as it gets. 15 APD officers, 3 Sherriff Deputies, and 1 State Police Officer have been implicated  accepting bribes to get cases dismissed in the largest bribery and conspiracy case in the city’s history.  Six APD Cops, One Bernalillo County Deputy Sherriff  and prominent criminal defense attorney Thomas Clear, III and his investigator Ricardo “Rick” Mendez, the 2 ring leaders in the federal DWI Enterprise scheme, have plead guilty as charged to bribery and racketeering involving our 3 largest law enforcement agencies. All nine who have plead guilty have yet to  be sentenced. Depending on the charges they plead to, each are facing between 70 and 130 years in prison.

The prosecution approaches the FBI and the United States Attorney have taken has been very  “piecemeal” over the last year.  There was no single indictment nor series of indictments of the  defendants.  Because there have been no trials and no sentencings, the public and the media have essentially been kept in the dark and relegated to reviewing and reporting on the contents of plea agreements filed in the cases to figure out what has been going on.

TURNOVERS  THAT COULD AFFECT CASE

There is no guarantee the prosecutions will in fact continue because of the turnover in the New Mexico United States Attorney’s Office as well as the FBI.

On February 14  U.S. Attorney for New Mexico Alexander Uballez resigned at the request of President Trump. Rather than charging all the those implicated in the case that the FBI had evidence on as he should have, Uballez “cherry picked” the 5  most egregious cases and negotiated plea agreements before he was fired by Trump. None of the defendants who plead guilty have been sentenced.  Uballez himself said that the way the case has been handled was not normal. Uballez said this:

The way we are approaching this very unique case is very different. … Typically, defendants are charged all at once and the resolution of their cases in court can take months.

There is really nothing “very unique” about the case as Uballez claims. It is a straightforward bribery of law enforcement case. It is a very typical federal racketeering case involving multiple defendants, multiple victims, and relying on a paper trail and relying on whoever the FBI can identify as victims and securing their testimony.

Public corruption cases, even involving law enforcement, are still proven by following the money and the paper trail and identifying the victims. Because there was no single indictment of all defendants together as is usually the case with racketeering cases, there is a real chance that all those who have been implicated will not be charged.

Uballez has never said why he did not let his successor make the decision on charging all suspects. He still could have charged all defendants at once, negotiated the 5 plea deals and the prosecution of the case would be going forward against the  remaining suspects assuring some sort of justice being served upon the entire bastion of corrupt cops. Instead Uballez rushed to plead the central figures in the case likely to preserve his own legacy in the case and so he could declare victory.

On April 19, Alexander Uballez announced he is running for Albuquerque Mayor leading to widespread speculation that the real motive for him to plead out the 5 cases was to protect his legacy on the case and to allow him to take a  victory lap  to generate publicity for his impending  candidacy for Mayor.

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/article_bbb7be32-ed67-11ef-9faf-afe3c73eeb01.html#tncms-source=home-featured-7-block

https://www.abqjournal.com/election/article_32b726a6-b9fa-421d-922e-8409a752c826.html#tncms-source=home-featured-7-block

On April 18, Ryan Ellison was appointed the new United States Attorney for New Mexico. Ellison made no mention when he was sworn in if he  will continue with the aggressive prosecution of the Federal DWI Enterprise bribery Case. What Ellison did say was “the United States Attorney’s Office will do its part to stem the unlawful flow of people and drugs into our country”.

https://www.justice.gov/usao-nm/pr/ryan-ellison-appointed-united-states-attorney-district-new-mexico

https://www.krqe.com/news/new-mexico/new-u-s-attorney-appointed-for-state-of-new-mexico/

https://www.koat.com/article/ryan-ellison-named-us-attorney-for-district-of-new-mexico/64542873

On May 23, Ellison announced the appointment of his new executive leadership team including his First Assistant and those who will be in charged of the Criminal, Civil, and Administrative Divisions of the office. Ellison again reiterated the office’s top two priorities of public safety and a secure U.S. border.  The NM United States Attorney’s office has the highest case load of deportations in the country.

US Attorney Ellison is concentrating on Trump’s Executive Order to prosecute  and deport people in the country illegally.  Ellison when announcing his executive staff  again made no mention if his office will  continue with the aggressive prosecution of the Federal DWI Enterprise bribery Case and if the investigation is yielding additional defendants.

https://www.abqjournal.com/news/article_ad80efdc-2f72-403a-90f2-378f98c9ae79.html

On April 29, Raul Bujanda, the Special Agent in Charge of the FBI in Albuquerque, left his position. The lead agency investigating the DWI bribery and corruption scandal is the FBI. No replacement has been announced. It’s unknown what his departure means for the DWI bribery and corruption case.

https://www.krqe.com/digital-shows/insiders/leader-of-albuquerque-fbi-steps-down/

COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS

President Trump’s Executive Orders mandate the Department of Justice to concentrate on prosecuting and deporting the undocumented in the country and closing the US-Mexican border.

The likely impact on the DWI Enterprise prosecutions with the appointment of a new US Attorney and departure of the  FBI Special Agent can not be overemphasized given Trumps Executive Orders. No assurances have been made by either US Attorney Ellison nor the FBI what will now happen to the case or if  even more defendants will be identified and charged. Both could decide the case has run its course. Both could decide to do nothing given the priorities of both offices have changed dramatically on a national level.

The NM United States Attorney and the FBI have no obligation to tell the public what will now happen to the largest bribery and corruption case in Albuquerque’s history, but the public should be told and the public has a right to know. Both the US Attorney and the FBI should not keep the public guessing and announce to the public that the case is going forward with more prosecutions expected and even more defendants to be identified.

There is no doubt that APD’s reputation has been trashed to a major extent because of the bribery scandal. APD is viewed by many as again having just another bastion of “dirty and corrupt cops” who have brought dishonor to their department and to their badges. The only way that any semblance of faith can be restored and for people to begin trusting APD and law enforcement in general again is if all the police officers involved in this scandal are held accountable and the lawyers involved are held accountable. That will only happen with aggressive prosecutions, convictions, and  prison sentences for the law enforcement officers and attorneys involved in the “DWI Enterprise” scheme.

Links to two related blog articles are here:

Exposing How Former US Attorney Alexander Uballez Prosecuted The Largest Bribery And Conspiracy Case In APD History By “Outing” The “Covert Investigation” And Then Rushing To Charge 5 Before Fired By Trump; His “Ass-Backward”, “Cherry Picking” Approach To The Prosecution; Charging Of 17 Others Implicated Remains In Doubt; The “Progressive Prosecutor” Versus The “Progressive Mayor”

Former 35 + Year APD Veteran Steve Hindi Implicated In DWI Corruption Scandal; CORRUPTION SCORECARD: 16 APD Officers, 3 Sherriff Deputies, 1 State Police Officer Implicated; 5 Cops and 2 Ring Leaders Plead Guilty As Charged; US Attorney For New Mexico Replaced, FBI Special Agent In Charge Steps Down; Will Aggressive Prosecutions Continue?

ABQ Journal Dinelli “Local Columnist” Article; Mayor Tim Keller’s 5 Gateway Shelters For Unhoused Unsustainable “Black Hole” Of Expenditures; Unhoused Refuse City Services; Mental Health Commitments Are Solution To Getting People Off City Streets

The Albuquerque Journal Editorial Opinion pages feature 5 types of opinion columns submitted for publication: those by the paper’s Editorial Board, those by the paper’s Community Council, those by Syndicated Columnists, those by Local Columnists and those by Local Voices.  Local Columnists are tasked with carrying a heavy load of responsibility to help readers scrutinize issues impacting them, their community and their country. It is the Journal’s goal to publish columnists from all walks of life and varying political viewpoints to give readers exposure to all sides of local issues.”

All headlines for Journal guest columns published are written by Journal editors and not the columnists. On May 24, the  Albuquerque Journal published on its editorial opinion page the below “Local Columnist” guest column by Pete Dinelli:

JOURNAL EDITOR’S HEADLINE: “The city should stop funneling money to the homeless population”

DINELLI AUTHORED HEADLINE:  Keller’s 5 Gateway Shelters For Unhoused Unsustainable “Black Hole” Of Expenditures; Unhoused Refuse City Services; Mental Health Commitments Are Solution To Getting People Off City Streets

BY PETE DINELLI, LOCAL COLUMNIST

Mayor Tim Keller has taken an “all the above approach” to deal with the city’s homeless crisis. It’s an unsustainable “black hole” of expenditures. Keller has established a total of five shelters that are to operate as an integrated system:

  • The Gibson Gateway Shelter.
  • The Gateway West Shelter.
  • The Gateway Family Shelter.
  • The Youth Homeless Shelter.
  • The Recovery Shelter.

In the last three years, the city has spent upwards of $275 million on homeless shelters, programs and purchasing and remodeling motels for low-income housing. In 2021, the city acquired the Lovelace Hospital for $15 million and spent $90 million to remodel it into the Gateway shelter. In the last two years, the Keller Administration spent $25 million to purchase and remodel motels for low-income housing.

In fiscal year 2021-2022, the Family Community Services Department spent $35 million on homeless initiatives. In fiscal year 2022-2023 the department spent another $59 million on homeless initiatives. On June 23, 2022, Keller announced that the city was adding $48 million to the fiscal year 2023 budget to address housing and homelessness issues in Albuquerque.

The fiscal year 2026 General Fund budget for the Health, Housing and Homelessness Department is $53.3 million. The sum includes $48 million for strategic support, health and human services, affordable housing, mental health services, emergency shelter services, homeless support services, shelter operations, substance abuse services and $4.2 million for the Gibson Gateway maintenance division.

The city is seeking funding for 116 separate services contracts totaling $53.7 million to pay for services provided to the unhoused:

  • $30.4 million for 32 affordable housing contracts.
  • $6.3 million for 12 emergency shelter contracts.
  • $2 million for 16 health and human service contracts.
  • $5.7 million for 29 homeless support service contracts.
  • $3.8 million for five Gateway Shelter operating contracts.
  • $2.2 million for 11 mental health service contracts.
  • $2.6 million for 11 substance abuse treatment contracts.

The 2024 Point In Time homeless survey found an 18% increase in Albuquerque’s homeless numbers. The PIT survey identified 2,740 people experiencing homelessness, including 1,231 on the streets, 1,289 in emergency shelters and 220 in transitional housing. The HHH Department’s fiscal year 2026 budget performance measures report emergency unsheltered as 6,103 in 2023, 7,420 in 2024, 7,257 targeted in 2025 and 8,439 targeted in 2026.

Keller has allowed the unhoused to proliferate city streets, parks and open spaces declining to enforce city and state vagrancy laws and make arrests. The problem is the chronic unhoused refuse to accept city services as Keller continues to throw city resources at the crisis.

A 2025 report by the city found 30% of individuals experiencing homelessness self report having a serious mental illness, 25% self report having a substance use disorder and around 66% experience some form of mental health condition. Too many chronic unhoused simply refuse city services.

Keller has essentially proclaimed the unhoused as “wards of the city.” The mayor’s approach is not sustainable. Such responsibility must be undertaken by the state or federal government. The millions spent to help the unhoused with many refusing services would have gone a long way to finance community centers, senior citizen centers, police and fire substations, preschool or after school programs, senior citizen programs, and police and fire programs.

A solution to deal with mentally ill and drug addicted homeless people who refuse city services is the initiation of civil mental health commitments by the state to mandate mental health care or drug addiction counseling in a hospital setting after a court hearing determining a person is a danger to themselves or others. Such an approach would get the mentally ill and drug addicted the health care they desperately need and off the streets.

Pete Dinelli is a former Albuquerque city councilor, former chief public safety officer and former chief deputy district attorney. You can read his daily news and commentary blog at www.PeteDinelli.com

EDITOR’S NOTE: Confidential sources who participated in taking the 2025 Point In Time survey count of the unhoused report that 75% of the emergency and chronic unhoused refuse to accept city emergency shelter and prefer to remain on the streets.  The 2025 legislature enacted the Behavioral Health package that will fund half billion-trust fund to build behavioral health facilities an hire personnel in 3 regions overseen by the courts to ensure due process of law and protect civil rights of the mentally ill. The county also has behavioral health tax where facilities are also being built. Mayor Keller and the city was misguided to convert the old Lovelace hospital to a 24/7 shelter and should have kept it as a hospital and use the 200 patient rooms for civil mental health commitments. Instead the  Keller Administration rezoned the hospital for a 24/7 homeless shelter. Part of the enacted behavioral health package expands the definition of “serious danger to self and others”. The Bernalillo County District Attorney is authorized under the law to initiate civil mental health commitments and get people committed for longer periods of time to compel treatment and get them the mental health care and substance abuse counseling they need, thereby making those committed wards of the state.

The link to a related blog article with statistics on the city’s unhoused numbers and city programs is here:

“Gateway Recovery” Micro-Community Made Up “Pallet Shelters” To Help City’s Homeless And Addicted; Keller’s 5 Shelter Approach To Homeless Crisis Is Unsustainable, Financial Black Hole Creating Wards Of The City; Audit Of 116 Service Contracts Involving $325 Million In Funding Over 4 Years For Homeless Services Is In Order